Many Political Parties, One Illegal Alien Flavor

In California, we have several political parties. On the Right, we have the California Illegal Alien Libertarian Party and the California Illegal Alien Republican Party. On the Left, we have the California Illegal Alien Green Party, the the California Illegal Alien Peace and Freedom Party and the California Illegal Alien Democratic Party.

The parties differ in some ways. Although they all love illegal alien criminal invaders who are destroying this state much more than American citizens, they do seem to differ in their love for the criminal aliens and bristling hatred for the citizens of our nation. The California Illegal Alien Republican Party probably loves the illegals and hates the citizens the least, though it's hard to say.

There's no difference for all intents and purposes between the wackjobs in the local Democratic Party and the flat-out idiots in the parties of the Left. All anti-illegal alien legislation has ended in this idiot state. We have stupid sanctuary cities all up and down our blighted Golden State. Raids against illegal aliens are few and far between.

I frequently see illegals working at workplaces, even large corporate stores, but I never bother to call ICE. San Fransisco is reeling from crimes committed by illegal alien criminals, including a high profile recent set of murders.

That these criminals were all minor illegal aliens, convicted of felonies, whom the lunatic city of San Fransisco then shipped out to group homes in order to keep the punk garbage from being deported back to whatever Banana Republic they invaded from, was the telling point. The city was shipping the felons to group homes at vast expense.

The punks would escape from the group homes in 2-3 weeks. Then they would come back to the city to prey on American citizens. Vast numbers of them are in gangs.

Los Angeles has been destroyed; a wasteland of gangs, graffiti, crime and foreigners where the English language is seldom heard and signs in English are hard to find. About 50% of the workers in Los Angeles County are illegal aliens, according to the City Council. The city mayor is a La Raza traitor.

California is not necessarily the land of the fruits and the nuts. One of my best friends is a Communist who is so furious about illegal aliens that I am a bit worried about him. That's not so unusual out here. The Hispanics here are hopeless, and most of the legal immigrants and Hispanic citizens are out and out traitors, supporting the armies of locust-like invaders.

It seems that an awful lot of Whites here have swallowed the Koolaid and gone over to illegal alien lover. There's a lot of pressure in that direction. If you speak out against the criminal invader army in public, people will jab you with their elbow and order you to shut up. Voices get raised, even White voices.

If there are any Hispanics around, you are going to get some sharp looks. It's downright dangerous to diss the illegals in most parts of this state, so a lot of Whites just wimp out, go native or wigger or the Hispanic equivalent, and just run up the White flag. We're outnumbered as it is, our existence is precarious, the Hispanic majority is rather dangerous, so why piss em off?

On the other hand, check out the San Fransisco Chronicle's recent articles on the City's raving nutball Sanctuary City bullshit policy. Probably 90% of the population of San Fransisco are Democrats and most are pretty liberal. What really struck me reading through the comments was how many apparently liberal Democrat San Fransiscans were frothing at the mouth over this Sanctuary City madness and illegal aliens in general.

A couple of decades ago, San Fransisco was home to some fine Democratic politicians, generally liberal, often ethnic. One thing they were, unlike this latest Leftwing cancer, was patriotic. They had names like Sam Alioto. I don't think for a second that Alioto would have stood for this Sanctuary City bullshit.

On the national level, things are the same. We have the Illegal Alien Republican Party and the Libertarian Party on the Right. The position of the Libertarian Party is variable. Talking to hardcore Libertarians on the ground, it seems almost 100% of them are pro-Open Borders. However, Ron Paul seemed to be running on some sort of an anti-illegal alien platform, although this goes against standard Libertarian philosophy.

On the Left, we have the usual gang of traitors and idiots.

There's the Illegal Alien Democratic Party, of which I am a reluctant member, which has as its unofficial policy the utter insanity of an end to workplace raids, an end to fines and an end to jail terms for criminals who hire invaders instead of real Americans, and complete amnesty for all of the criminals who invaded our land and displaced real Americans from their jobs, and spread crime, gangs, graffiti, massive dropout rates, ghettos, decay, squalor, degeneration, lowering of the quality of life, and devastation all over our fair land.

That is basically the same stance as the the Illegal Alien Green Party, of which I am also a reluctant member. On the far Left, we have the Illegal Alien Communist Party USA, of which I am once again a reluctant member.

The two parties are running two traitors for President. Barack Obama, whom I otherwise support, was the co-sponsor of the Kennedy-McCain Amnesty Insanity bill that was thankfully shot down last summer. John McCain, as the name of the bill implies, was sponsor, along with Ted Kennedy, an otherwise fine liberal politician.

McCain now says he would vote against his own bill. He goes around the country speaking to Hispanic groups, telling them in public meetings that he opposes amnesty and in private meetings that he still supports his Kennedy-McCain Amnesty Psychosis Bill.

Other than that, Obama is actually even worse. He wants to end all of the otherwise meager workplace raids. Even Bush still carries out one of those once in a blue moon.

I kind of like to go to liberal and Left websites. I have lots of choices. I can got to the Daily Kos Illegal Alien site or I can go to the Counterpunch Illegal Alien site. Can someone show me a liberal or Left website doesn't love criminal invaders and despise real Americans?

I can and used to subscribe to liberal and Left magazines. I had some choices. Mother Jones Illegal Alien magazine, The Nation Illegal Alien magazine and Utne Reader Illegal Alien magazine. On the Right, I have some more choices. I can subscribe to Time Illegal Alien magazine or Newsweek Illegal Alien magazine.

So many choices! Plenty of parties, websites and mags for the illegals, and almost none for the real Americans.

When it comes to a bunch of invader criminals tearing up our land and devastating our wages, just about 100% of our political and media class supports them. When it comes to workers who are real American citizens, most all of the parties on the Right and Left and all of the media on the Left and Right are out to screw them by empowering their enemies, the illegals. For the illegals, everything. For American citizens, nothing.

What a bunch of crap!

Niggers* and Beaners* Wrecked the Economy and Other BS

It's not just White nationalists who are making this racist argument. The business class has also taken it up. Turns out Bill Clinton blew up the economy by forcing fine upstanding loan sharks to loan to stupid, low IQ, morally depraved, irresponsible Blacks and Hispanics.

I do not agree with this argument, "Blacks and Browns ruined our economy" one bit. For one thing, there is not the tiniest bit of evidence that this is true. Social scientists and journalists, liberal or not, often tell the truth. If Blacks and Hispanics ruined our economy, that's unpleasant to hear to most liberals, but it's going to come out sooner or later, because a lot liberals (like me) would write about it whether it's PC or not.

First of all, the "pressure to loan to Blacks and Browns" thing came in under Clinton around 1992 or so. There was a problem, because entire Black and Brown neighborhoods were redlined as bad credit risk. There were all sorts of creditworthy folks living there, but they could not get a loan because of where they lived.

This was back in the American Middle Ages, 15 years ago, when lenders actually cared whether or not you could repay a loan.

The economy blew up due to subprimes in 2008. There is a horrible time lag there that just does not make sense.

This argument portrays lenders as the good guys who were forced to loan to scummy non-White ghetto types who never intended to pay back their loans.

First of all, the banks were never really involved in any of this from what I can tell. One of the drivers of this whole crazy mess was the farming out of home loans to home loan institutions like Countrywide which were basically run by criminals. The banks washed their hands of the debt because it wasn't getting paid back to them anyway.

The Countrywide folks deliberately made bad debts to noncreditworthy folks because the debt wasn't going to be paid back to them either. Why? They were going to package it and fraudulently sell it to a bunch of sucker victims. Criminal accounting agencies gave the crap mortgage securities AAA ratings so they sold better.

Suckers all over bought the stuff, including I guess a bunch of banks?! Surely, brokerages went up to their necks in buying crap mortgage securities. Then insurance companies like AIG insured the buyers of this crap debt in case it went bad. The whole fraudulent mess blew up, as anyone with any sense knew it would. But when to scammers and fraudsters ever care about the damage they do?

This argument attempts to portray the Countrywide criminals as fine upstanding citizens, forced by Evil Big Government into making loans to deadbeat niggers* and beaners* who anyone knew would never pay back the loans.

That's not true. These guys were deliberately making shit loans because they make like ~$5,000 commission on each one. They sold the debt so they didn't give a damn if it went bad. The more loans the better. Standards were lowered and subprime bullshit was invented to get noncreditworthy folks in the door and put their John Hancock on the loan they could never pay back.

Suckers were fooled about their real ability to pay back the loans - they were told that they would be able to pay back the loans easily, and they fell for it. Hey, scammers and fraudsters are good. They fool all sorts of people, even smart people, all the time. It's not the victim's fault when he's taken by a sociopathic con artist.

Furthermore, it is not up to me to decide whether or not I can pay back a loan.

Me? I'm basically insolvent.

I'd love to have a loan for $20,000, $50K, $100K or however much your fool ass is willing to loan to me.

Of course I can't pay it back.

My credit rating will get wrecked, but if I need the cash, I won't care, and anyway, you will be left holding the bag, and out for $100K or whatever. It's up to you, the lender, to decide if I am a good credit risk or not. One look at my bottom line should send any lender into paroxysms of laughter.

Anyone who makes an extravagant loan to me is an idiot, deserves what they get, and odds are they are going to lose big. Lending institutions used to be sane. Borrowers were examined with a fine tooth comb and run through the gauntlet. Few loans went bad.

When the loan isn't coming back to you anyway, there's zero motive to care about repayability.

That's a recipe for disaster.

Here a smart commenter, turkey, offers a modified theory that offers bits of both theories and seems to make sense. Clintonite neoliberal hucksters used anti-racism as a ruse to allow (Not force, since they wanted to do it anyway!) lenders to lower standards. They tossed in the clincher of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac backing of the crap loans.

This was an era in which both Republicans and Democrats were in on the increasing privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Some Clintonite Dem criminals like Franklin Raines made millions off this fraud. Republicans were basically along for the ride. Black and Brown proles were used as suckers and conned into credit-wrecking loans that they could not pay back so huckster-criminals could make a fast buck.

RL: "There appears to be little evidence to back this up. For many years, banks had different standards for Whites versus non-Whites and many Blacks found it almost impossible to get a home loan no matter how good their credit was."

turkey: Actually, the VDare top guy (Brimelow) pointed out in a '93 Forbes article that the default rate in the early '90s was the same for blacks and whites, i.e. the mortgage lenders were using correct terms and the market was sane. If blacks were held to unreasonably high standards they'd have had lower default rates than whites.

Instead during the '90s the neoliberal Democrats used race crusading as a ruse to let lenders make quick money off marginal loans often implicitly backed by the government (which they were all champing at the bit to do - this does not excuse them), while seeming to stay on the side of the angels, and Republicans saw the angle and got down in the trough, too.

The default rate differential between whites and black ballooned under the irrational regime. I'm not familiar with the "Hispanic" analogs but there's been so much immigration that it's probably hard to follow.

There's actually a PDF on the net of a response from Fannie Mae propagandists in the early '90s trying to get Brimelow to shut up about their gravy train that you can download. The bullshitting is obvious in hindsight.

So the higher quality of white nationalists are laying some blame on the exploitation of the religion of anti-racism, not on lumpen whites and blacks and mestizos and Amerinds themselves, who shouldn't be blamed for trusting a smiling fixer that said they could have a nice house.

*Used sardonically