No One Helps Chinese Toddler Hit by Two Vans

Very disturbing video. A toddler wanders in front of a van in a narrow alleyway in China. The driver apparently does not see the child and runs over it. He realizes what he did and takes off instead of sticking around. A second van then runs over the kid again. This one also figures out what he did and takes over. The frantic mother is freaking out the whole time.

There was some sort of capitalist mercenary motive involved here, but I forget what it was. Something about insurance, but I forget the details. All hail Deng Xiaoping!

Thugs Assault Retarded Woman

Very disturbing video shot in a bad neighborhood in Sacramento, California. Thugs harass and ultimately beat up a retarded woman who is hanging out in a strip mall.

Robbery Caught on Tape

Amazing video shows an actual robbery in a college town. Students are seated outside what appears to be a coffee shop in this city. One man is sitting drinking his coffee. A non-student runs by, grabs his laptop and runs away. It's all over so fast. People are looking around afterward and the thief is nowhere to be seen.

Woman Badly Beaten in McDonald's

In this shocking video, two women get into it with an employee at a McDonald's in Greenwich Village when he tries to check their $50 bill to see if it is a fake or not. One of the women attacks the worker and another woman vaults over the counter to chase the worker into the back of the store so she can attack him. The worker grabs a metal rod and beats the woman with it! He was arrested, but a lot of people are coming to his defense. Apparently he has a prison record.

Jacobs Juvenile Bigfoot Photos

Famous photos taken by a deer hunter in western Pennsylvania in 2007. He set up the camera with a salt lick to attract deer. He got some deer, some bears and also apparently a juvenile Bigfoot! The Pennsylvania Department of Fish and Game says that this is a "mangy bear." Many continue to insist that it is mangy bear. However, the limb to torso measurements are completely wrong for a bear, plus bears don't bend down to sniff things the way this thing bends down to smell the salt lick. The way it bends down is typical for an ape.

Bears have limb to torso ratios of 60%. Humans and primates have ratios of 120-150%. This animal has a ratio of 122%.

Juvenile Bigfoots are quadrupedal until they are three or four years old, when they begin to walk bipedally.

Interestingly, the trail cam that took these shots was repeatedly broken and had to be replaced a number of times. There are many reports of Bigfoots destroying trail cams. Few if any other animals routinely destroy trail cams. Bigfoots are apparently upset by the night flash of the trail cams.

Debate continues to rage over these strange photos, with even members of the Bigfoot researcher community saying that it's just a mangy bear.

The Patterson - Gimlin Bigfoot Footage

The Holy Grail of Bigfoot tapes. For a variety of reasons, this clinches the argument over whether or not Bigfoot exists.

In 1967, Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin left Yakima, Washington and went to Willow Creek, California. They were both cowboys and worked seasonally. Patterson had been hunting Bigfoot for a long time; in fact, he was more or less a fulltime Bigfoot hunter for half the year. He had also written a book about Bigfoot. Despite all of that, he was just a cowboy, and he was not a particularly educated man.

Patterson brought Gimlin along because he wanted the best horseman he could find, and Gimlin is one of the finest cowboys out there. They went to Willow Creek because many Bigfoot tracks had been seen in the area recently as logging roads were opening up, so they figured it was a good place to look. These tracks were first noted in 1958 by Jerry Crews, a road worker.

The family of a recently deceased man named Ray Wallace has claimed that he created the Bigfoot myth by walking around in the woods wearing wooden shoes. The family has produced the shoes. However, the tracks left by his wooden feet do not match at all to the many known Bigfoot prints on many variables.

On October 20, they went to Bluff Creek, California, near the border between Humboldt and Del Norte Counties. They were riding along a trail along Bluff Creek when they came to an uprooted tree stump as large as a room in a house. As they moved past it, they looked down in the creek bed. There had been huge storms in the spring and much of the tree cover around the stream was washed away. In order to get to the creek, animals had to move across the open creekbed to get to the water.

Both men saw the Bigfoot at once. Patterson's "unspookable" horse spooked and flipped him off of it. Patterson struggled to pull himself from under the horse, which had fallen tot he ground, then to get his camera out of his bag. He then began running across the creekbed pursuing the Bigfoot. He got about 15-20 seconds of the finest footage anyone has ever made of a female Bigfoot, 24 feet of 16mm film with a 16mm Kodak camera.

People went back the next day and made classic Bigfoot casts of the footprints in the soil. Bigfoot footprints have been found all over and many casts have been made. They share common abnormalities that would make them hard to fake. They lack an arch, and have a bone present that is not in a human foot. There are several other ways that they are different.

Mathematical calculations based on the prints showed that "Patty" weighed 550 pounds and that she was 7 feet 6 1/2 inches tall. The prints were 14.5 inches long and 6 inches wide.

Since that time, several people have all come forward with different stories that they wore a monkey suit for the footage. Each person has a different story and some even have the suits. Some keep dragging out new suits every year, trying to make them better and better, since in general, they look nothing like the footage.

Hollywood filmmakers have said it would be difficult or impossible to make a suit like that and that probably no human could be trained to walk the way Patty walks, or if so, only with extensive training. Patty displays a completely non-human method of locomotion would be difficult, if not impossible, for a human to imitate.

Note in the footage where Patty turns to look at the camera. Note how she turns her whole upper body around, including her shoulders, not just her head. A human generally only turns their head, but apes turn their upper body around, since they can't turn just their head. Who would have thought of that?

Note the hairy breasts. Even apes do not have hair breasts.

Movement of thigh muscles can be seen as Patty runs. This movement is perfect, exactly the way a huge thigh would move. The muscle would not be visible under a costume.

Patty has a hernia on her left thigh. A hernia would not be visible under a costume.

Notice the absolutely natural way that Patty walks in a manner of locomotion that is utterly nonhuman.

Notice how long her arms are compared to the rest of the body.

Patty's knee operates at a completely different angle when walking than a normal human knee does - it is not fully extended. This may be an adaptation to supporting a great deal of weight.

Patty has huge shoulders, calculated at 34 inches wide. The average man has shoulders 25 inches wide. A wide shouldered man is 28-29 inches. Humans with shoulders over 30 inches are nearly unheard of. Even Andre the Giant's specs do not match Patty's.

In 1998, the BBC paid special effects people to make a perfect Patty costume, then had an actor run along to imitate Patty. The documentary was billed as destroying the Patterson footage once and for all. The effort failed completely. To this day, no one, not even the finest Hollywood special effects designers, has been able to use an actor and a monkey suit to recreate this footage. Keep in mind that 43 years ago, special effects was still in its infancy and it is orders of magnitude better now than it was then.

No one has been able to prove that this footage is a fake. The worst one can say about it is that it is a mystery.

Patterson died of cancer in 1972. Gimlin is still alive, but he never made a dime off the footage. Both men were of high moral caliber, which cannot be said of the numerous fakers who all said they worse the costume that day.

Here a Hollywood animator says that the footage obviously shows and unknown animal, and that footage could not possibly be faked with a costume and actor via modern techniques.

I am a CG animator by profession. As part of my craft I have an intuitive sense of natural human movement. I animate human characters for games.

When I view the Patterson-Gimlin film, I see a mode of movement that is not human, but humanlike. The arm swing and movement of the shoulder girdles are clearly that of a truly massive frame. The musculature of the creature is very thick, but not restrictive to the range of motion in the shoulder joints.

In the trapezius muscle group, the diamond shaped set of muscles that anchor the shoulders, nape of the neck and upper thoracic vertebrae, the contraction of these thick muscle sheets is visible. In the cadence of the walk, and the amount of bobbing up and down, the presence of great and compact body mass is evident.

Also the creatures knee, not reaching full extension, is certainly an adaptation to supporting great weight. A fully extended knee has poor resistance to twisting forces. In conclusion, the reality of the film subject as an uncatalogued animal is self evident.

It simply cannot be a costume, the boundaries of the human form do not even fit within the form of the creature. Furthermore, the mass of the creature is so great and carried with such poise, a man could not even be trained to carry such great weight or walk bearing weight in such a fashion.

The muscle masses, if they had been padding, would have been static and restrictive. The presence of visible muscle contraction, the freedom of movement, the cadence of the walk, all fully support the claim that the footage documents a living hominid outside of the genus of man.

"New York Baby" Bigfoot Footage

Great footage of a baby Bigfoot and climbing a tree in New York. Its parent lifts it up in the tree and then it plays up there for a while. The footage was shot in 1996 by Doug Pridgen in New York state. The nearest town is Poughkeepsie. It takes place at Lembo Lake between Modena and Ardonia near the Catskill Mountains.

The people had no idea of the animals in the background until afterwards when they were transferring the footage onto VHS.

According to prominent primatalogists, the figure in the video is either an exceptionally large gibbon, a small chimpanzee or an unclassified primate species. The possibility exists that someone released an ape into the surroundings. However, this is unlikely, as few people keep apes as pets and it's illegal to do so in most states.

There are many reports of baby Bigfoots climbing trees. Apparently they are typically quadripedal until they are three or four years old when they start to walk upright. At this stage, they have been seen many times in trees. Young Bigfoots are vulnerable to predators, so it's logical that they should be arboreal when young to protect themselves. There is an adult Bigfoot to the right lifting the baby Bigfoot into the tree, but you can't see it very well.

This Bigfoot footage is quite famous now.

The Freeman Bigfoot Footage

More famous Bigfoot footage, probably in the Top 10.

Paul Freeman was a worker for the local watershed district when he shot this footage in 1994 in the Blue Mountains on the border of Washington and Oregon. He saw a Bigfoot in the area previously and reported it, but he was widely ridiculed at work. Thereafter, he swore to always carry a camera with him in the woods.

A while later, he found some tracks and started following them. This is the start of the video. Then he comes upon a Bigfoot and photographs it briefly while he freaks out. At one point, the Bigfoot bends down to pick up a smaller object, possibly a baby Bigfoot. Then it moves off into the woods.

This video is controversial, but I think it is very good. Notice how the creature simply bends aside 10 foot tall pine trees as it moves through the woods. One complaint is that the Bigfoot looks down as it walks. Supposedly a wild animal would never do that. However, a sprained foot would be a serious injury for such a large animal. In the Patterson footage, Patty also looks down at the ground once, so it's possible that Bigfoot, like humans, looks at the ground while it walks to make sure it did not fall.

The video is controversial, as some call Freeman a faker and liar. Supposedly he was so upset at people making fun of him for after he saw the first Bigfoot that he faked this footage to "show them who's boss." I can't comment on that, other than to say that this is a damned good costume. Further tainting Freeman is that he has been proven to have faked some of his evidence, including tracks and hair. Tragically, this calls nearly all of his evidence, tracks, videos, hair, etc. into question. Once you start faking stuff, your credibility is gone forever.

The problem is that some of his tracks are very good and would be very hard to fake. There are a few possibilities. Either he found some real tracks and then started to make fake tracks or he started to fake tracks and then he found some real ones.

A real problem with Freedman is that he was one of those guys who always seemed to be there when a Bigfoot or its tracks showed up. The reason for his problems at work were not so much ridicule from other workers, but instead, right from the beginning, forest workers felt that his sightings and tracks were hoaxes.

Furthermore, tracks were found in the area where Freeman shot this video, and they have been analyzed. There is a deformity between the 2nd and 3rd toes on one of the Bigfoot's feet. Amazingly, footprints with this exact same deformity were found in the same area a while back. Then, a few years later, more tracks were found in the same area with the same deformity.

On the other hand, many Bigfoot researchers feel that this film is a fake. If it is, it's an awfully good one.

But this is definitely a legendary Bigfoot tape.

Memorial Day Bigfoot Footage

This is one of the most famous Bigfoot clips ever shot. The footage was shot by Lori and Owen Pate in 1996 at Chopata Lake in north central Washington state while on a camping trip with family and friends. A figure, resembling a man covered with dark hair, runs across an open area, then stoops to pick something up. Then it disappears into the woods. Notice how much it looks like a man. There had been two previous sightings of this figure shortly before this footage was shot.

The general impression amongst many researchers in the field is that this video is some kind of an elaborate hoax. It runs like a man, not like a Bigfoot. Never has a Bigfoot been observed to have run in this manner. When it stops at the end to supposedly pick something up, purportedly a baby Bigfoot, actually it is probably taking off its ape mask. One actor wearing an ape mask died in the production of a movie. That mask would have gotten awfully hot running across that field.

On the other hand, it does look like a Bigfoot, and it also walks like one.

Debunkers had a runner run across the landscape in an effort to duplicate this footage. The runner easily ran faster than the figure in the video.

Nevertheless, the father of the girl who shot the video continues, 15 years later, to vouch for its reliability, as do the people who shot it. The girl and her boyfriend made enough money off the video to buy a new camcorder and some gas for the car, but they didn't really make much money off it.

Furthermore, 30 people watched this figure walk quickly across the landscape. Were they all in on the hoax? The evidence seems to be that most of the witnesses did not even know each other, but were just strangers at the lake. Were a few in on a hoax and then 30 innocent people watched the hoax? Who knows? That would make more sense. The kids who shot this footage haven't made much money off of it. If the Bigfoot really did pick up its kid at the end of its walk, that makes sense as a reason why it put itself in full view like that.

A few days prior, a fisherman had seen a Bigfoot at this same lake. He estimated the height to be 6.5-7 feet. Owen Pate saw a Bigfoot running across the field shortly before this one. It was also 6.5-7 feet tall. Then they got the camcorder and this one started to run across the field too. But it was smaller, maybe 5.5 feet tall.

And in this sequence, the filmed object does indeed appear to slow down or stop, pick something up, and put it on top its head. Then its head appears 8 inches taller. It really does look like it bent down and picked up a baby Bigfoot and put it on its head.

Problems with the mask theory are as follows...

1) A mask would be too small to account for the apparent size of the lifted object.

2) The object first lifts up, then down, and then quickly up again. Why??

3) The object lifts up without the use of any hands. How??

4) The object can be seen, in a few stills, to be slightly behind the subject's head. (Exactly where an infant would be seen, if it were sitting on the subject's shoulders...btw.)

5) The subject's head/face never changes color, even after the supposed mask is taken off.

Furthermore, the object, a female Bigfoot, already has one baby on her back when she starts her run. Then she runs over and picks up another baby. So in this video there are three Bigfoots. A mother Bigfoot with first one, then two baby Bigfoots on her back.

Or, alternatively, there is a baby Bigfoot on the mother's back. At some point, it falls off, then she picks it up again and puts it on her shoulders.

On the other hand, a film expert has supposedly conducted an enhanced analysis of this video that shows the guy taking off his monkey mask at the end. Another analysis showed that using a color technique, the subject in the film appears to be wearing a brown suit with a green base that shows through when run through certain filters.

When the people who shot the film contacted a major Bigfoot researcher, their primary concern was how much money they could make off of it.

Grover Krantz, in a recent book, said he did not want to waste ink in this footage.

At the end of the day, no one seems to know what to do with this footage. It has not been reliably proven to be either a hoax or a real Bigfoot. However, my personal opinion was first that it was real, then that it was fake, and now I have come back around to being certain it is real.

The clincher for me was a slowed down sequence showing the female Bigfoot obviously lifting the baby Bigfoot onto her shoulders as she runs. Furthermore, I have learned more about the makers of the video and their family and I no longer think that they are hoaxers.

It has been 15 years since this footage was taken, and no one has yet come forward claiming to be part of a hoax, and 30 people witnessed the event. Further, no one has yet come forward claiming to be the guy in the suit either. In addition, there were multiple other Bigfoot sightings in the area in the preceding three days before the footage was shot.

Peguis Backroad Bigfoot Footage

Shot in Manitoba, March 2007, by a Native American and his son who were going out to get some firewood. They saw the creature, then the man told his son to grab the camcorder in the backseat, then they shot the footage. I think this footage is very good. I'm quite pleased with it. Once you see a lot of these videos, you start to get really freaked out and frightened because they all look so similar. There's no way that all these people could be making such fantastic costumes that all look the same and then training people to walk like this.

Further, the arms are way longer than human arms. The only way would be if some Hollywood film studio and come scientists were hiring actors to run around in the woods all over North America, or else all of these hoaxers were hiring this expensive team to do fancy hoaxes for them.

Nevertheless, some think that this film is dubious and may be a hoax.

Enchanted Forest Bigfoot Sighting

Filmed by kids in the Enchanted Forest, Vancouver Island, British Colombia, 2007. Kids surprise a sleeping Bigfoot, it gets up, moves away from them, hides, watches them, then moves away.

Not a bad video.

Myakka City, Florida Bigfoot Footage

Nice footage from Myakka City, Florida in a palmetto grove.

I don't know what to make of this, but it's similar to the others. When you watch a lot of these good videos, you get the creepiest feeling that you are watching the same damned animal over and over. The way this one looks and walks is almost exactly the way Patty walks. That's what you would expect for a wild animal. It's look doesn't vary all that much, and its method of locomotion is the always the same. I can't get over seeing that coned head over and over either.

Russian Cliff Bigfoot Footage

From a Russian documentary in 2009. Footage of a Bigfoot on a cliff somewhere in Siberia. This video is actually pretty good. Once again, you see that classic look.

Bigfoot Eyeshine Video

Very interesting video from Kentucky taken at nighttime in the middle of the woods.

Released by the Bigfoot Research Organization, one of the best and most scientific groups working on the subject.

All we can say is:

The animal is not a deer.

The animal is apparently about 7 feet tall. There are a few to no animals in the woods that are 7 feet tall except a bear standing upright. They don't stand upright for very long, and they only do so if they have a good reason to.

For instance, in British Colombia, I watched, panicked, while a huge 7-8 ft tall Black bear piked up our ice chest over and over, lifting it over its head and then smashing it down to the ground. We eventually gave up on the ice chest, and the battered chest was found the next morning with all of the food gone. The bear had been heard by our camp throughout the night, presumably eating the food in the chest.

Point is, that bear is only going to stand up to pick up that chest and lift it over its head and smash it down to the ground. It's not going to stand up for many other reasons. And it won't stand up in the woods for a minute just to stare at you. A bear stands up to make some sort of a threatening gesture, then sits back down, quadruped that he is.

On the other hand, Sasquatches do exactly this in the nighttime. They stand there and stare at you, often for a very long time, often making little or no sound.

Is the creature a man? It's 7 feet tall! It's in the middle of the woods with no flashlight. And those eyes are way too big to be human, if you ask me.

Is this a hoax? Possibly, but BFRO is very good about weeding out hoaxes.

Hoaxes are the bane of Sasquatch research. They just ruin everything. The country is full of these damned hoaxers. I feel there is a lot of excellent evidence for Sasquatch, but to get to it, you have to wade through a damned tidal wave of crap, hoaxes, liars and con artists.

Why all the hoaxes? Some are just having a good time.

For for others, it's the money. After all, Bigfoot means big money. Not really big money, but big enough. A lot of folks in the US don't have a lot of cash. Hooking onto the Bigfoot bandwagon is a nice way to drum up a bit of moolah. Even Moneymaker of the BFRO sold a Bigfoot tape, which later turned out to be a probable hoax, to big bucks Bigfoot researcher Adrian Erickson for $20,000.

I would like to have $20,000. I don't even know what $20,000 looks like. If I wasn't scientifically minded, I'm not sure I would believe that $20,000 even exists. So this is the kind of money we are talking about.

Beast of Gum Hill Video

Nice video recorded in Gum Hill, which is in southwest Virginia in Appalachian Mountains.

Ignore the dangerous and evil wild animal destroying a poor innocent stream with his despicable ATV.

Focus instead on the gentle and decent cryptid that walks across the stream, retrieves an infant on the other side, puts it on his shoulder, and walks away. The community is divided on this video, and no one knows what to think of it. If it's a hoax and a guy with a costume, it's a damn good one. Notice how the animal in the ATV is focusing completely on its task of destroying the stream. If it was a hoax, it would have been looking ahead and anticipating the costume guy.

The cryptid is approximately 8 fucking feet tall! You can tell by comparing the size of the cryptid with the fat animal riding the ATV. Look at how fast it strides across that stream. The stream is ~45-60 feet across. The cryptid moves across the stream in only nine strides. That's probably impossible for a human of any size.

If it's a hoax, that must be Shaq O'Neill in a Gilly suit.

That's the animal's hillbilly female mate yelling, "What was that?" at the end.

Unfortunately, the cryptid in this vid is a "Blobsquatch." Typical of so many Bigfoot videos.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-zmsgG6oKo&feature=related]

Try this enhanced version instead.

One of the arguments for this thing being a hoax is that no Bigfoot would get anywhere near the wild animal and his mechanical beast that is wrecking the stream. However, it wanted to rescue its infant. Interesting that we now have three videos - Memorial Day, Freeman, and Gum Hill, in which Bigfoots put themselves in full view of humans to apparently rescue young ones and take them away. That would seem to be a good reason for a very shy creature to put itself in full view.

I regard this as a video of a real Bigfoot. The enhanced version is pretty amazing.

Mike Greene's Squeaky Bigfoot Video

First ever thermal image of what appears to be a Bigfoot. Mike Greene is a longtime researcher with excellent credentials and decades of experience. He formerly worked as a fraud investigator. He and his group had many Bigfoot encounters at night at this abandoned picnic area in a North Carolina forest. Finally he started enticing the Bigfoot with objects like squeaky duck toys and candy bars. It was a candy bar that lured it into the situation that resulted in the obtaining of this footage.

Greene is not one to hoax. Did he get hoaxed? Dubious.

The other question is whether or not this is just a man wandering around in the woods and hiding behind trees and whatnot. Why didn't he stop by and say hello to the group. Another point is that the forest is very thick here. A man wandering around without a flashlight would surely injure himself. There are comparison videos out showing this cryptid and comparing to a man who recreated the video. The man is much shorter and thinner than the cryptid.

I regard this as real Bigfoot footage, the first ever with a thermal camera.

This is just a highlight of the video. To see the whole thing, you have to go to his website and pay a couple of bucks. It's unfortunate that it's come down to this, but everyone has a right to make a buck. Problem is that once you start making money off Bigfoot stuff, your credibility obviously comes into question. But the temptation to make a buck off this stuff is probably too much for most to resist.

Marble Mountain Bigfoot Footage

One of the greatest Bigfoot videos ever, but few have heard of it. Here it is. Even if you don't believe in Bigfoot, the footage is still amazing, and you ought to check it out. Shot in the Marble Mountains Wilderness in Trinity County of Northern California. The video incorrectly gives the location as the Central Sierras. Not the case.

The video was shot in the July, 2000. A Christian high school group called Campus Life organized a hike into the wilderness with 15 handicapped kids.

The kids were very quick to spot the Bigfoot on the ridge 1/2 mile away.

The group is hiking around and they come upon this extremely strange structure built of branches. The branches are large and have been broken in half by something very strong, not with a saw. The inside has matted down mass, excellent for sleeping or retiring. There are claw marks on surrounding trees. They crawl inside the shelter and are able to make it in.

I have seen videos of many of these structures and I am sure that they are made by Bigfoots. These are the "nests" that the Bigfoots make to hole up in during the day. Gorillas and chimps also make nests. Bigfoot nests have been discovered and reported on many occasions in the past 200 years in North America. Claw marks on trees are also often found in Bigfoot areas.

Nearby, there is what looks like a fireplace, but no one has ever made a fire there. These rock structures or piles of rocks are frequently reported in Bigfoot area. Their meaning is unknown.

At some point, one of the boys notices something on a ridge a full 1/2 mile away. They get out the video camera and start videotaping it. It is extremely tall and is not shaped like a man at all. It does not walk like a man, nor does it stand like one. It sways its hips in a strange way, and its method of locomotion is wrong for a man. The range of motion of its hips appears to be outside the human range.

It has a strange curved humpbacked structure about its upper back. It walks very fast, and goes down a 3 foot drop from a rock like it was nothing. Its body seems much too wide to be a man, and its arms are too long to be human arms. The position of its head on its shoulders is unlike that of a man - compare the Bigfoot's head and shoulders to that of the man at 9:24 in the video.The shoulders appear to be about 4 feet wide - this is far outside the human range.

It appears to have cupped hands, and it may be possible to make out a coned head. It walks with both legs bent - its legs do not straighten out as it walks like a human's do. This so-called "compliant gate" is almost or nearly impossible to fake. He also walks "like a tightrope walker" - this is called the "inline step," and it is also difficult if not impossible to fake. Measurements have been made of the figure in the film - its chest is 56" and its waist is 54". Sure walks awfully fast and eloquently for an obese guy, eh?

Here is good background on the Christian group leader of disabled kids who shot the film - he could not possibly have hoaxed this video.

The Bigfoot comes down to point nearer to the humans and seems to be very angry. It seems to shake its fist at them. It moves back and forth in a very agitated way. It puts its hand to its head as if it was thinking. Then it puts both hands to its head in an expression of apparent anguish. Various emotions are revealed, including possibly despair, anguish, regret, disappointment and frustration.

The Bigfoot apparently noticed, at 1/2 mile away, that the humans had discovered its nest and it moved down the ridge and engaged in various displays of threat and anguish in response to their discovery.

The Bigfoot is very large. Measurements taken later show it is higher than an 8'3" branch. That means it could well be 9-10 feet tall. I feel this is a male Bigfoot because of the elegant way its body looks. Male and female Bigfoots have distinctive appearances.

The group went back up to the ridge later to look for footprints, but there were none due to the rocky nature of the terrain.

Naysayers have used some software technique to imply that the "Bigfoot" is hoaxed and was wearing clothing. Others have said that the height measurement was incorrect and instead the Bigfoot was taller than a man. I am familiar with the Campus Life Christian group. They are as straight as can be. Campus Life hoaxed this video, on a hike with disabled kids to boot? They built the stick structure too? How did they do that? Those sticks broken by something strong and were not sawed. It would take a long time to build a fake nest like that. Forget it.

I do not believe this figure is wearing clothing. I do not believe it is as tall as a man - just look at the video and tell me that. It could very well have been 9-10 feet tall.

Spoiled Brat Gets a Sports Car for Her Birthday, Throws a Tantrum

Incredible video. A rich man gives a teenage girl a brand new fancy sports car for her 16th birthday and she throws a tantrum because it's the wrong color.

LOL, classic!