Sexmaniacman just told me the following:
Hey Bob, a woman just told me that I have a take it or leave it attitude. I was interested, but obviously, I said, "Yeah, so what?" Then she said, "See? That was take it or leave it right there." I said, "Sure, I know. So what." Then she said that was what she loved about me (this take it or leave it attitude that she says she actually dislikes), and then mentioned how she wants to have sex with me.
For some reason, I thought, "Ho-hum, she wants to have sex with me, yawn." And I like this woman. But this "I can take it or leave it" attitude towards sex feels really liberating. Make them work for it. I'm a privileged catch and you have to work to get me. I think women really despise guys who crawl all around trying to kiss up to them and accommodate them.
I never realized I had such a dicky attitude, but I think it's the best. On the other hand, you should also try to be accommodating to others to some extent, and I do.
I'm reading this guy's blog here, which is all about picking up chicks. It's for young guys in their 20's who are upper middle class yuppies. Everyone else needn't bother to read.
I disagree with some of the stuff he says, but he does have some good points.
He says never complain about a lousy kiss from a woman. I disagree. You go to kiss a woman at the end of the date and she turns her cheek and lets you peck her cheek. Lean back and say, "Wow," real sarcastically.
Most of the time, that will get her back up and she'll start kissing you for real. If that doesn't work, make fun of her. Say, "You call that a kiss? Where'd you learn how to kiss? You don't even know how to kiss." But say it humorously, not angrily.
Women actually like to be provoked. It works pretty good to suggest they can't kiss worth a crap or they are probably frigid and lousy in bed. That's a direct challenge, and a lot of the time, they will respond to it by showing you, "Damn right I know how to kiss/fuck, etc, baby!"
The mistakes he is talking about are guys who don't know how to read women. You have to read women. You need to be an expert in verbal and nonverbal communication. I'm still learning this stuff every day, and I figure it's a Lifetime Course. I can't emphasize this strongly enough, because you really do need to learn this stuff in order to deal with women.
Here the guy asks his date to kiss him. I've always thought that's the stupidest thing in the world to do. Never ask a new woman if she wants to have any kind of sex act. Don't even ask your girlfriend if she wants to have sex. Let her ask you or take the initiative.
I've always just been a Rapist and an Attacker. I just grab at them or needle them with my feet or make rude sexual remarks. I always make a big joke out of it and I'm laughing and screwing around the whole time.
It's hit or miss that way, but I've had sex with scores of women. The only new woman you should ask if she wants to have sex with you is a whore. Any other female is probably going to say no, and they don't get better as they get older.
Generally, you have to wait until you get the proper signals that it's ok to assault her. You might have to wait a while. The signals might never come, in which case you probably don't assault her. Just figure she's a lost cause and don't date her anymore.
If you try to assault her and she pushes you away or threatens to call the cops (Yes, it's happened to me) just shrug your shoulders, forget about her, and then act mildly put out the rest of the night. She'll feel bad and try to make up for it. Act like, "Gimme one reason why I should date you again?" Not angry or anything, just "take it or leave it."
Assault can be very soft, slow-motion and tender, like a movie that's in slow motion, or you can just push her up against the wall and kiss her really hard. I've done both many, many times, and I do recommend this approach.
Bob, I remember one time I was out with this rock band. I was trying to screw the lead singer, whose name was Ann.
I won't give you the name of the band because there were sort of big around LA for awhile (she's still kind of famous and there are pics of her on the Net)and this might get back to me.
I just Googled her and it turns out that later she went solo and formed her own band and released some albums. She also played with some of the big LA punk bands. You can order her records on Amazon and some other places. She's still performing up til 1989, then she's gone.
There was another woman there, Linda, and I'd already had sex with her, but now we were sort of through. I think Linda and Ann were having sex at some point.
They were all a bunch of goth rockers and I was a punker with a leather jacket and an attitude. The goth guys were mostly fags or bi or might as well have been. If you were good looking, confident, cocky and didn't act like a total queer, you could clean up with the goth chicks, who were mostly bi themselves, by the way.
You just had to play this role of arrogant, old-fashioned guy disgusted by all the rampant homo/bi-sexuality in the scene. The chicks all thought that mean and horrible and disgusting, but then they wanted to have sex with you too, because you know, you were really the only real man around.
I was in the back seat in a car full of this punk band's members, and I kept reaching up in front and grabbing Ann. She was reaching back and we were playing games with fingers and grabbing or some shit.
Everyone else was talking and watching us like, "What are they doing, anyway?" I was partly doing this to piss off Linda, and she didn't like it too much. But she wasn't putting out anymore anyway, so I was a free man, and she needed to avert her eyes and shut up.
We were walking into this Denny's at like 2 AM and I finally realized how pissed I was at Ann. She'd been teasing me like this for way too long. As we walked into the doorway, I suddenly grabbed her and shoved her up against the wall and kissed her real hard. Then, just as quickly, I let her go and smiled like nothing had happened.
The whole party (the band members) was like, "Whoa!"
Linda asked with a weird smile, like I was acting extremely weird, "Sexman, what do you think you are doing?"
Duh. What do you think I'm doing? Ann acted like she didn't know what hit her, but she liked it of course. The guys in the band were like, "Whoa, this dude's hardcore, man."
We went to the table and everyone made sure Ann was out of reach of me because now I was a confirmed public assaulter-rapist, and they didn't want any more scenes. But Ann was smiling and chatting me up the whole meal.
It's good to give women orders too, Bob. Have you ever done that? Do. I picked up this woman in a bar once within like three minutes of walking into the joint. It was a place called the Anti-Club in Hollywood. It was 1985, the show was Christian Death, and it was too awesome.
Three minutes, I bought her a drink, had my arm around her and was feeling her up. We left the club for a while, drove around and sort of had sex in the car while driving around Hollyweird, then went back to the club.
At the end of the show, the date had gone sour, and she tried to ditch me.
I looked at her and said, "Hey, look, you don't understand. You're not going home with them. You're going home with me." Smiling the whole time.
That got her back up good. "Oh yeah? Who says?"
"Says me." Still smiling.
"Wait a minute. Let me try something." She tells me to stand up straight on the sidewalk and looks me up and down lasciviously for about a minute like it's some kind of test.
"OK," she said. So I drove her home from LA to Orange County and we managed to have sex in the car on the 5 Freeway in downtown LA going 55 miles an hour at 2 AM, which is always interesting.
She had the same name as my Mom. I told her that, and she acted disgusted, like, "Fuck your Mom, you wimp. Obviously you're abnormally attached to her."
Another time I had a new woman in my bedroom. I had her top off and was feeling her tits.
She whimpered, in this totally lame voice, "Please let me go home."
Obviously she didn't mean it.
I said, "No way, you're staying right here." Not real psycho-like, but firm nevertheless.
She was free to leave, as the cops say, and her car was in the driveway. At some point there was an argument.
I said, "Get over on that bed right now." Same way, not real crazy, but firm nevertheless. She was free to say no.
Of course, she scurried over to the bed very obediently like a little puppy. Then, later, at some point, she didn't want to have sex or something.
I just got out of bed, walked over to the couch and said, "Fine, if you don't want to fuck, I'll just sleep on the couch. You sleep on the bed. See you in the morning."
And closed my eyes.
Not two minutes went by and I heard this little bird chirping, "Come on over to the bed." You can guess what happens next.
So a proper mixture of assertiveness and indifference can sometimes work wonders.
I'm sitting here, Bob, thinking that I have to get rid of this take it or leave it attitude, but the major part of me says, "Who cares? This is the way I am, and I'm not out to kiss up to or accommodate everyone else. This is me and this is my style, like it or not, I'm not making any major changes to suit you or anyone else."
This Roissy guy is going on and on about alpha males and beta males. I confess I don't get it. What's the difference? Do betas get lots of women, or is that impossible? I have a huge ego, I strut around like a rooster, I'm cocky and vain, and I think I'm Joe Hotshot With the Chicks and King of the World combined, even though it's not true at all anymore. So is that alpha or what? I'm not sure I understand what he's getting at.
Showing posts with label I am a Sexist Bastard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label I am a Sexist Bastard. Show all posts
Friday, November 28, 2008
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Funny Motivational Posters
The problem with the PC Left is they have no sense of humor. Most humor is sexist, racist or just plain cruel in some way or another. PC humor is pretty much an oxymoron. In the spirit of offending everyone without getting this blog a content warning, check out some great motivating posters. There's something here to offend just about everyone.
From the Pirate 4X4 ORV Forum, a lot of Photoshop work in the spirit of motivational posters. You will need to click each pic to enlarge it and see it better.
My favorites so far are the Boobs and Seal posters. Runners up - MySpace, 58 Drunk and Horny, Sometimes, Rope and Bathroom Mirror.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
From the Pirate 4X4 ORV Forum, a lot of Photoshop work in the spirit of motivational posters. You will need to click each pic to enlarge it and see it better.
My favorites so far are the Boobs and Seal posters. Runners up - MySpace, 58 Drunk and Horny, Sometimes, Rope and Bathroom Mirror.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.Thursday, August 07, 2008
Do We Live In a Patriarchy?
The latest death toll figures from Hurricane Katrina can be seen on this website here. The famous Russian neo-Nazi video is on this blog here.
Updated August 23:
In the comments section, two of my favorite bloggers, k&y of to the ambient void suggest that we live in a patriarchy today. I think that these two guys are both gay, but that's fine with me, in fact, I think it's great! I decided to call Sexmaniacman over to ask him what he thought of the notion that we live in a patriarchy today. Here's what he wrote:
Updated August 23:
In the comments section, two of my favorite bloggers, k&y of to the ambient void suggest that we live in a patriarchy today. I think that these two guys are both gay, but that's fine with me, in fact, I think it's great! I decided to call Sexmaniacman over to ask him what he thought of the notion that we live in a patriarchy today. Here's what he wrote:
It's easy for gay men to side with women in the War Between the Sexes because they're not trying to fuck women, so they don't have to put up with women's bullshit that is inevitable in those of us who do.Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
They're trying to fuck guys in a gay culture that seems a Hell of a lot more sex-friendly and sex-positive than this chilly het culture with these censorious female and mostly feminist Comstocks wanting to beat us with rods every time we get a hardon.
Like to look at porn? You're a woman-hater. Can't get laid, poor guy? Haha, say the feminists, you loser. Now, me, a masculinist, I side with the guy. The guy's not getting laid because of women. Women don't put out that much, and they're collectively refusing to fuck this guy, and then ridiculing him for it.
Like to girl-watch? You're a woman-hater. Like to look a pictures of pretty girls in magazines or on TV or like to watch beauty pageants or have girlie pictures on your walls? You hate women. Excuse me, feminist ladies, but that is one chilly anti-sexual turd you're laying on our sex parade. This society of yours, where 90% of the time guys get hardons, it's due to "sexual objectification of women", sucks.
I don't know if we have a patriarchy or not. I go to the feminist sites and read about really horrible, obnoxious, and, yes, misogynistic behavior, and I feel tremendous empathy for these feminists in their frustration, depression and rage. Really I do. Now, these feminists probably hate me for being a dog, but I want to tell them that I feel your pain, ladies.
Thing is, if we have a patriarchy, I, being a male, am supposed to be on top and winning the race. Instead I feel like I'm getting fucked, and have been getting fucked for much of my life.
I don't feel like I'm winning, or like I'm a member of some male ruling class, or anything like that. A lot of my non-rich male friends feel that way. They feel like an oppressed class, not some member of some ruling class called a patriarchy. I can't think of one benefit I ever got in my whole damned life due to having a dick.
So a lot of us are pissed at feminists. Feminists are sitting on the sidelines, screaming that we're a ruling class that's oppressing them, and we don't feel like we're oppressing anyone. As for being a ruling class, a lot of us can hardly pay the rent, much less take out one of these expensive things called females.
In the same way a lot of White guys are mad at White Privilege Theory and the notion that we live in a White Supremacist society. What did I ever get from being White. How was I ever privileged in life? I can barely even pay my rent and bills. I'm privileged how now? I'm oppressing who now? It's the same thing - they say we are in a White ruling class but a lot of us feel like an oppressed underclass.
It also kind of pisses off us het guys that so many women are still gold-diggers, I mean whores, I mean, well, what do I mean? They want money, our money. Much of it, most of it, all of it, whatever. They go for the guy with the most money. If we don't have lots of money, we don't get laid. Worse, we are not even men.
The number of women who have abandoned this collective gendered money-grubbing thievery of us men is small, although some middle-aged women start to leave it behind, because they lose their looks and are not much wanted anymore, so they can't sell their fucking pussies anymore. If you're a woman going for the rich guys, you're a whore. You're selling your pussy for money, real simple. If you're not a whore, what are you?
What does feminism say about this ubiquitous behavior? Nothing, nothing, nothing. The silence is deafening. You see the charts about how women make less money than we do. Are they including the zillions of dollars women steal from men by selling their pussies to us?
Nowadays a lot of women make as much money as we do, or more. My girlfriends always seemed to make more money than I do, and that, by the way, pretty much ruins any het relationship nowadays. Even though these bitches made more money than I did, I still had to pay for every single fucking thing when we went out anywhere.
All her money's for her, and all my money's for her. Nice arrangement. Nice rip-off arrangement. Rip-off of me that is.
What does feminism say about this grasping whoredom? Nothing at all! Well, I'm a guy and it pisses me off. My friends and I regularly refer to women as "whores", because from our vantage, that's what they are.
We've discussed this with some women. Those who responded civilly suggested that when you get married, the woman's not whoring anymore, but then the conniving bitch gets 1/2 my money for the rest of my life.
Does this sound like patriarchy to you? Sounds like women on top and us lowly males as some kind of Underclass.
I'm tired of a lot of feminists, though I do support a lot of, or most of, their goals.
What I'm tired of is this anti-sex shit. They seem like they don't want me to get laid. And they don't want my friends to get laid. They don't even want me or my friends to look at women in public. God forbid we look at pornography. I'm not allowed to look at any sexual depictions of women whatsoever. That's reducing women to sex objects.
Well, fuck.
If I'm horny, women are sex objects to me. Sorry.
I'm not gay. I'm interested in fucking women. Have been my whole life.
My surfer friends on the beach used to fuck everything female that moved. They'd rent a house on the beach, have permanent kegs of beer, sell dope, and screw 100 women a summer, three a day. These guys were my idols, but I could never quite do it like they did, no matter how hard I tried. It seemed like they were trying to set new world records. I understand that feminists hate this behavior and regard it as misogyny.
Well fuck me.
I guess I'm a boys will be boys, girls will be girls type. I notice 3rd world women take the attitude that all men are dogs and nothing can be done about this, so don't worry about it. That seems a lot more helpful.
I'm basically a dog anyway when it comes to women. I've always been one. I may not even be capable of monogamy. At various times in my life, I've been a compulsive womanizer. I'd be one today too, I bet, except I'm not having much luck. I understand feminists hate compulsive womanizers and say we're misogynist.
Well, fuck you, feminists.
All's fair in love and war.
Saturday, August 02, 2008
Sexmaniacman Is A Creep
Updated August 23: Warning! This post contains rank sexism! If that offends you, then just don't read! And if any of you ladies find it ruffles your frilly little panties, come on over and take Sexguy's picture with your cellphone and post it on your feminazi blogs. Further, Sexmaniacman invites all the silly little overexcited females who are upset by this pig post to come to the blog and throw their panties at him.
It's official. Sexmaniacman is a creep. And a pervert. And he's proud.
Sexmaniacman just learned the definition right here. First of all, "creep" is a woman word, and no real male would commonly use such a word as a noun or a verb. Sexmaniacman just doesn't use it in general, because he's a real man, not a pussified ally of the females, but every now and then, it's appropriate.
For instance, Sexman's Mom works at a college. There was a male student there for a while, socially inept, who used to hide under and behind cars out in the parking lot and jump out at the college girls. I guess he thought it was funny or something.
The girls were not amused and they kept complaining to the administration. With some regret, Sexmaniacman will admit that this guy's behavior is creepy. But really, it's only creepy in that they don't find him attractive.
If Leonardo DiCaprio was hiding behind cars and jumping out at them, about 50% of these fine upright examples of innocent American feminine goodness, purity and light would have fucked him already (Not that they're sluts or anything like that!), and most of their "sweet and innocent" friends would be waiting in line.
So it's not necessarily the behavior that these silly little woman-children don't like, it's the fact that the guy is unattractive, unwanted and unappealing, and then he's trying his luck with them.
He realizes this was frightening to the girls, but Sexmaniacman happened to know the idiot who was doing this, and it's just his opinion that the guy's completely harmless, though obviously a social retard.
These strong, modern, rough, tough, feminist puffed-up ladies should have just told him to fuck off a few times, and probably it would have all stopped. But apparently they kept running away like the little girls they really are deep down inside, so the behavior continued for too long.
So, yeah, Sexmaniacman is obviously a fucking creep according to the definition below. Plus he's a pervert. He never was one, but then he hit 47 or so, and now he can't look at young women anymore in case he gives them a heart attack or induces post-traumatic stress disorder or molests them with his eyeballs requiring years of weepy and bank-breaking therapy sessions to untwist their poor fragile psyches.
Sexguy is perfectly aware that the vast majority of young women don't find guys his age attractive anymore. That's very painful for him to realize. He looks at younger women, and he doesn't think, "Wow, I have a chance with her." Instead, she often reminds him of so and so who he dated or slept with back in 1978. So he's looking at them and reminiscing, wistful memories of days gone by. And if that pisses you little bitches off, well he says too fucking bad.
They looked great then, and they look great now.
Beauty contestants focus on females aged around 18-20. Other than the fact that they probably can't use minors, the reason they do this is because at this age, females of all races, in all cultures, and at all times, are at the peak of their physical beauty.
It's a common myth that a guy hits 45 and 50 and can't get an erection anymore. Actually, many of us guys still can and do, believe it or not, Sexmaniacman noted. We may be old, but we're not dead. You can't touch a 16-17 year old girl with a 10-foot pole and an 11-foot extension, but they sure are nice to look at. If acknowledging this makes Sexdude a pervert and a fucking creep, then he will wear that badge proudly.
Sexmaniacman probably wouldn't want to sleep with them even if it were legal, because it's impossible to have an intelligent conversation with these silly girly things. Not that older women are much better!
Sexmaniacman will aver that when he was 43 years old, he had an 18 year old Korean girlfriend from LA. Eat your heart out, bitches.
You hate that sooo much, don't you?
Good.
From the site:
Sexcat figure that's probably what's going on in a lot of this sexual harassment bullshit. He remembers he worked at a place once where the whole office freaked out because some poor schmuck asked a woman out. To look at the guy, Sexman figured he probably hadn't been laid by a non-professional in at least months, so he had a God-given right to ask, and Sexguy felt deep sympathy for his sex-deprived brother.
She was being nice to him and talking him, and all the silly bitch had to do was say no and that was that. The guy was civilized, he would have just taken it like a man. But oh no, Ms. Silly made it into a capital fucking offense, and it was the talk of the whole office for a while.
Being a real guy, not a wuss, of course Sexbuddy took the guy's side in this skirmish of the War Between Men and Women, but most of the "men" in the office sided with Ms. Silly, like knights running to save her honor.
Afterwards the poor guy told Sexpal that management told him that sexual harassment guidelines said that employees should not be dating. Great. Here it is, in the modern US, where so many of us are working long hours, and we can't date at work. Great. So how are we supposed to get laid?
Sexmaniacman finally had to adopt some new rules to deal with this bullshit, but he realized he was not the only one. He read a sociology paper about guys who moved down to Costa Rica. One guy said when he was 50, an uppity 17 year old girl spit at him for looking at her. I guess that was the last straw, and he high-tailed for the sexually relaxed tropics.
His 43 year old sick, perverted, creepy brother had some advice: "Sexguy! Look. Invest in some sunglasses! I look at them all the time. That's one of the great things about being in junior college - I'm surrounded by 18-20 yr old hotties!"
Sexdude's new rules were to avoid looking at obviously underage girls or sometimes even those around 18-20, but it was so hard to tell ages. He'd look at em a bit, see if they looked back, and if they didn't, he'd try not to look at them too much. Kind of hard to do when they are young and beautiful!
Sexmaniacman also noticed something disturbing about this bullshit. As much as these silly little twats claimed they hated it, he could not help but notice that a certain number of them (Definitely not all but for sure some!), often the better looking and older ones (18-23 or so), relished the attention they got from him.
They deliberately strutted, tipped, weaved, swayed and sashayed, flirted and winked, stole glances and battled lashes. At the stores, they shoved the others out of the way so they could ring up Sexman and reap the harvest of his loving eyeballs. They smiled at him coquettishly and made bullshit excuses to get up and strut in front of him, to nowhere and to do nothing, and then traipse back, basking in the warm, delicious rays of his sick, pervy, aging gaze.
They looked at him out of the corner of their eyes and winked. When he wasn't looking, they moved way too close and pretended to look at store things they weren't interested in. Sexmaniacman would look down, notice a 16 year old just about brushing her tits up against him, and pretend nothing was happening.
It sure was an idiotic little girl game these female things were playing, but females often don't make much sense to Sexguy. Some were jockeying for the eyeballs and others were bitching about illegal looking. Were some of them one and the same? Who knows?
Sexmaniacman thinks we can look at them all we want, that's his position. If they don't like it, they can call the cops, or take pictures of us with their bitchy cellphones and post them on their screechy blogs, or sit around and carp to their girlfriends about us.
There's also a right and wrong way to look, Sexman thought. You look a little bit, you look away, a while later, you look again. Staring is pretty uncool.
Sexmaniacman can't remember the last time he catcalled a woman. That's rude, and he's not rude.
Sexmaniacman doesn't rub up against women, but when he was a lot younger, especially at bars and rock concerts, women were always rubbing up against him and touching him, because he was drop dead gorgeous guy, especially when he wore a beat-up 1950's James Dean leather jacket.
Touching and groping is rude, and he's not rude.
Jerking off in public is illegal, and guys who do that deserve cuffs.
However, he objects to the whole Feminazi mindset behind this bullshit movement, mostly because they haven't specified where harassment begins and where it ends. Supposedly the females get to make up the rules here, on an individual, case by case basis! Great!
Webpage here, and most of these guys portrayed here are idiots, Sexguy agrees, but he's still worried that there are no boundaries here. Sexman is particularly disturbed by the modern notion that he can no longer talk to teenage girls or young women in any way or at any time or about anything, since they automatically assume he's trying to pick up on them, when usually he's just trying to make some innocent conversation.
Also, the silly feminist bitch idea is that all women hate being looked at. Bullshit.
Sexman's beautiful aunt was in the Castro District of San Fransisco eating at a cafe with Sexman's Mom. His aunt is a silly woman, like most women are at least sometimes.
She's getting all upset. "None of these men are looking at me," she pouted huffily. She's beautiful, and male looks are like vitamins for her soul.
Duh. They're all gay.
Sexmaniacman also knows some older women who love to be or would love to be looked at. One, 50 years old, mournfully told him that she wishes men or even boys would look at her. One delighted in telling him how young men and even boys continued to check her out, and how she loved every second of it, being 50 years old.
This video shows a silly feminazi bitch who's actually pretty good-looking, who got all dressed up in a really sexy and revealing outfit, then strutted like an idiot down a main avenue in New York, then, like a dumbshit, got all pissy when of course most of the guys looked at her. I guess the numerous fags didn't look at her, so they must be better than the straight guys. So the solution I guess is we all just turn queer? Obviously.
This ditzy broad tells one guy he was looking at her breasts. He was, but he did it because her tits were hanging out, you goofy woman.
Sexmaniacman thought a lot of these guys were looking way too long and way too obviously, but last time I checked, it's America, still a free country despite everything, and you have a right to act stupid.
Sexdude was actually trying to control his diabolical and wicked looking behaviors lately, but the young girlies women-children were still getting all hot and bothered anyway. There didn't seem to be any way to appease them once you were past a certain age.
Sexdude doesn't like guys making comments at women without some verbal and nonverbal signals on her part (going far beyond parading around half-naked like the goofy bitch in the video), but all in all, the woman in this video is one dumb cunt.
Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
It's official. Sexmaniacman is a creep. And a pervert. And he's proud.
Sexmaniacman just learned the definition right here. First of all, "creep" is a woman word, and no real male would commonly use such a word as a noun or a verb. Sexmaniacman just doesn't use it in general, because he's a real man, not a pussified ally of the females, but every now and then, it's appropriate.
For instance, Sexman's Mom works at a college. There was a male student there for a while, socially inept, who used to hide under and behind cars out in the parking lot and jump out at the college girls. I guess he thought it was funny or something.
The girls were not amused and they kept complaining to the administration. With some regret, Sexmaniacman will admit that this guy's behavior is creepy. But really, it's only creepy in that they don't find him attractive.
If Leonardo DiCaprio was hiding behind cars and jumping out at them, about 50% of these fine upright examples of innocent American feminine goodness, purity and light would have fucked him already (Not that they're sluts or anything like that!), and most of their "sweet and innocent" friends would be waiting in line.
So it's not necessarily the behavior that these silly little woman-children don't like, it's the fact that the guy is unattractive, unwanted and unappealing, and then he's trying his luck with them.
He realizes this was frightening to the girls, but Sexmaniacman happened to know the idiot who was doing this, and it's just his opinion that the guy's completely harmless, though obviously a social retard.
These strong, modern, rough, tough, feminist puffed-up ladies should have just told him to fuck off a few times, and probably it would have all stopped. But apparently they kept running away like the little girls they really are deep down inside, so the behavior continued for too long.
So, yeah, Sexmaniacman is obviously a fucking creep according to the definition below. Plus he's a pervert. He never was one, but then he hit 47 or so, and now he can't look at young women anymore in case he gives them a heart attack or induces post-traumatic stress disorder or molests them with his eyeballs requiring years of weepy and bank-breaking therapy sessions to untwist their poor fragile psyches.
Sexguy is perfectly aware that the vast majority of young women don't find guys his age attractive anymore. That's very painful for him to realize. He looks at younger women, and he doesn't think, "Wow, I have a chance with her." Instead, she often reminds him of so and so who he dated or slept with back in 1978. So he's looking at them and reminiscing, wistful memories of days gone by. And if that pisses you little bitches off, well he says too fucking bad.
They looked great then, and they look great now.
Beauty contestants focus on females aged around 18-20. Other than the fact that they probably can't use minors, the reason they do this is because at this age, females of all races, in all cultures, and at all times, are at the peak of their physical beauty.
It's a common myth that a guy hits 45 and 50 and can't get an erection anymore. Actually, many of us guys still can and do, believe it or not, Sexmaniacman noted. We may be old, but we're not dead. You can't touch a 16-17 year old girl with a 10-foot pole and an 11-foot extension, but they sure are nice to look at. If acknowledging this makes Sexdude a pervert and a fucking creep, then he will wear that badge proudly.
Sexmaniacman probably wouldn't want to sleep with them even if it were legal, because it's impossible to have an intelligent conversation with these silly girly things. Not that older women are much better!
Sexmaniacman will aver that when he was 43 years old, he had an 18 year old Korean girlfriend from LA. Eat your heart out, bitches.
You hate that sooo much, don't you?
Good.
From the site:
I think I've generally come to the conclusion that a lot of women's definition of a "creepy guy"/pervert is:Well, yeah, duh. If you don't want us to look at your fucking tits, Sexmaniacman suggested, then don't walk around with your boobs hanging out. If you're showing cleavage, or God forbid have your tits halfway hanging out, Sexbro is going to look right at them, Goddamn it, and fuck you if you don't like it. If it pisses you off so much, dress like a lady for Chrissake.
A guy they find unattractive, who checks them out.
Most straight women, of course, liked to be noticed by guys they find attractive, and a lot of women will dress to attract men they fancy. The problem a lot of women seem to have is, is that there's an unwanted side effect. If they dress sexy, they not only get looked at by the sexy guys, they also get looked at by the guys they don't fancy.
It's like during the 1980's when all political correctness issues came to the fore with a vengeance. In a work setting, a bloke could chat a woman up. If she fancied him, it was fine and dandy. If she didn't, it was called sexual harassment.Yeah.
Sexcat figure that's probably what's going on in a lot of this sexual harassment bullshit. He remembers he worked at a place once where the whole office freaked out because some poor schmuck asked a woman out. To look at the guy, Sexman figured he probably hadn't been laid by a non-professional in at least months, so he had a God-given right to ask, and Sexguy felt deep sympathy for his sex-deprived brother.
She was being nice to him and talking him, and all the silly bitch had to do was say no and that was that. The guy was civilized, he would have just taken it like a man. But oh no, Ms. Silly made it into a capital fucking offense, and it was the talk of the whole office for a while.
Being a real guy, not a wuss, of course Sexbuddy took the guy's side in this skirmish of the War Between Men and Women, but most of the "men" in the office sided with Ms. Silly, like knights running to save her honor.
Afterwards the poor guy told Sexpal that management told him that sexual harassment guidelines said that employees should not be dating. Great. Here it is, in the modern US, where so many of us are working long hours, and we can't date at work. Great. So how are we supposed to get laid?
Sexmaniacman finally had to adopt some new rules to deal with this bullshit, but he realized he was not the only one. He read a sociology paper about guys who moved down to Costa Rica. One guy said when he was 50, an uppity 17 year old girl spit at him for looking at her. I guess that was the last straw, and he high-tailed for the sexually relaxed tropics.
His 43 year old sick, perverted, creepy brother had some advice: "Sexguy! Look. Invest in some sunglasses! I look at them all the time. That's one of the great things about being in junior college - I'm surrounded by 18-20 yr old hotties!"
Sexdude's new rules were to avoid looking at obviously underage girls or sometimes even those around 18-20, but it was so hard to tell ages. He'd look at em a bit, see if they looked back, and if they didn't, he'd try not to look at them too much. Kind of hard to do when they are young and beautiful!
Sexmaniacman also noticed something disturbing about this bullshit. As much as these silly little twats claimed they hated it, he could not help but notice that a certain number of them (Definitely not all but for sure some!), often the better looking and older ones (18-23 or so), relished the attention they got from him.
They deliberately strutted, tipped, weaved, swayed and sashayed, flirted and winked, stole glances and battled lashes. At the stores, they shoved the others out of the way so they could ring up Sexman and reap the harvest of his loving eyeballs. They smiled at him coquettishly and made bullshit excuses to get up and strut in front of him, to nowhere and to do nothing, and then traipse back, basking in the warm, delicious rays of his sick, pervy, aging gaze.
They looked at him out of the corner of their eyes and winked. When he wasn't looking, they moved way too close and pretended to look at store things they weren't interested in. Sexmaniacman would look down, notice a 16 year old just about brushing her tits up against him, and pretend nothing was happening.
It sure was an idiotic little girl game these female things were playing, but females often don't make much sense to Sexguy. Some were jockeying for the eyeballs and others were bitching about illegal looking. Were some of them one and the same? Who knows?
Sexmaniacman thinks we can look at them all we want, that's his position. If they don't like it, they can call the cops, or take pictures of us with their bitchy cellphones and post them on their screechy blogs, or sit around and carp to their girlfriends about us.
There's also a right and wrong way to look, Sexman thought. You look a little bit, you look away, a while later, you look again. Staring is pretty uncool.
Sexmaniacman can't remember the last time he catcalled a woman. That's rude, and he's not rude.
Sexmaniacman doesn't rub up against women, but when he was a lot younger, especially at bars and rock concerts, women were always rubbing up against him and touching him, because he was drop dead gorgeous guy, especially when he wore a beat-up 1950's James Dean leather jacket.
Touching and groping is rude, and he's not rude.
Jerking off in public is illegal, and guys who do that deserve cuffs.
However, he objects to the whole Feminazi mindset behind this bullshit movement, mostly because they haven't specified where harassment begins and where it ends. Supposedly the females get to make up the rules here, on an individual, case by case basis! Great!
Webpage here, and most of these guys portrayed here are idiots, Sexguy agrees, but he's still worried that there are no boundaries here. Sexman is particularly disturbed by the modern notion that he can no longer talk to teenage girls or young women in any way or at any time or about anything, since they automatically assume he's trying to pick up on them, when usually he's just trying to make some innocent conversation.
Also, the silly feminist bitch idea is that all women hate being looked at. Bullshit.
Sexman's beautiful aunt was in the Castro District of San Fransisco eating at a cafe with Sexman's Mom. His aunt is a silly woman, like most women are at least sometimes.
She's getting all upset. "None of these men are looking at me," she pouted huffily. She's beautiful, and male looks are like vitamins for her soul.
Duh. They're all gay.
Sexmaniacman also knows some older women who love to be or would love to be looked at. One, 50 years old, mournfully told him that she wishes men or even boys would look at her. One delighted in telling him how young men and even boys continued to check her out, and how she loved every second of it, being 50 years old.
This video shows a silly feminazi bitch who's actually pretty good-looking, who got all dressed up in a really sexy and revealing outfit, then strutted like an idiot down a main avenue in New York, then, like a dumbshit, got all pissy when of course most of the guys looked at her. I guess the numerous fags didn't look at her, so they must be better than the straight guys. So the solution I guess is we all just turn queer? Obviously.
This ditzy broad tells one guy he was looking at her breasts. He was, but he did it because her tits were hanging out, you goofy woman.
Sexmaniacman thought a lot of these guys were looking way too long and way too obviously, but last time I checked, it's America, still a free country despite everything, and you have a right to act stupid.
Sexdude was actually trying to control his diabolical and wicked looking behaviors lately, but the young girlies women-children were still getting all hot and bothered anyway. There didn't seem to be any way to appease them once you were past a certain age.
Sexdude doesn't like guys making comments at women without some verbal and nonverbal signals on her part (going far beyond parading around half-naked like the goofy bitch in the video), but all in all, the woman in this video is one dumb cunt.
Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
Saturday, July 19, 2008
Sexmaniacman Praises Sex Crimes
Sexmaniacman kept reading the news in the papers and on the Net, and could not believe his eyes anymore.
A US diplomat goes to Brazil and "molests" some "little girls" aged 14-17, which Sexmaniacman assumed is perfectly legal in Brazil. He comes back to the US and gets arrested on "pedophile" charges.
A gay man "molests" a 15-year-old gay "little boy" prostitute in the Philippines, comes home to the US, and is arrested and labeled "pedophile". His arrest is uncovered when he goes to work for a local politician and his career is shot.
A local US mayor with long hair and a beard like a ZZ Top musician "molests" a 15-year-old "little girl". He's sentenced to prison and reviled by a town who hopes he stays away for a long time.
Roman Polanski gives a 13-year-old girl a Quaalude long ago, "molests" her, flees the phony prosecution for the sanity of France, where he remains to this day.
Mark Foley does little more than talk dirty to some "little boy" pages aged 16-17 (some of whom apparently enjoyed it), never touches any of them even once, and is labeled "pedophile".
In the UK, a father takes pictures of his kids on a slide in the park and insane irate mothers order him to stop taking pictures, and when he refuses, they go to the cops. Obviously he's a child molester. Whoops. He's just a father taking pics of his own kids.
Sexmaniacman looks at all the "pedophiles" above and cheers them on, despite the hysteria, although he thinks Mark Foley was an idiot. Sexmaniacman figures that if these guys want to have sex with teenagers, that's their business. Sexmaniacman realizes it's illegal, and he hopes he won't do it himself, but he can't see it as a sin.
We're in the midst of madness. Child Molester Mass Hysteria, to be precise.
Sexmaniacman did lots of "molesting", and had lots of fun, back in the day. He was 18, 19 and 20, and the women and "little girls" never stopped coming. The females were all ages, but plenty were 14, 15, 16 and 17. He had sex with them all, and then he got up in the morning and did it some more. He's proud of it to this very day. Nowadays, he'd be a "pedophile" for doing that. Back in the day, it was just good times.
Sexmaniacman had some "pedophile" friends. One was 28 years old, had a 16-yr-old "little girl" girlfriend, and "molested" her regularly.
Sexmaniacman cheered his friend on for this dastardly "pedophile" episode.
Sexmaniacman had another friend, Killerdude. He was 29 years old, and they were over at Killerdude's Mom's house getting high as kites and laughing their asses off. Killerdude's little sister's 15-yr-old girlfriend walked out of the bedroom and out the front door, waving goodbye. Killerdude confided to Sexmaniacman that he had just had sex with that "little girl" the other day.
His sister had approached Killerdude, said her friend wanted to have sex with him, and would he do it? He obviously obliged. What else could he do but "molest" her, right?
Sexmaniacman approved, and cheered his "pedophile" friend on.
Sexmaniacman gave up on the young girls when he turned 21. After that, they needed to be 18. In dubious cases, he even asked for ID.
Sexmaniacman read a pdf on the Net about Costa Rica. There are all kinds of American men down there having all sorts of sex fun with girls and women. In Costa Rica, a girl is a woman at age 13.
So you could say that Costa Rica is just a nation of sex perverts and child molesting sick fucks, and the whole country needs to be arrested. The males all need prison or castration or preferably both, and the females all need lifetime therapy for "getting molested".
Sexmaniacman cheers on Costa Rica in their freedom of choice and thumbing their nose at Child Molester Mass Hysteria.
There are men down there, American men, the pdf said, older guys, and some are having sex with underage girls. It didn't really give ages, but the implication was they were 14-17 years old. The guys were also doing it with women. They were just screwing anything, like any real man does if he gets a chance. The Costa Ricans wouldn't do anything about it because they didn't think it was a crime.
Sexmaniacman cheered them on, all of them, the American men doing this, the Costa Ricans for shrugging their shoulders, and the girls for having a good time. He didn't think he would want to go to Costa Rica, or any foreign land, and do it himself, since teenage girls hardly interested him much anymore, but he didn't care if another guy did.
The idiots in the US government, egged on by the Child Molester Mass Hysteria sweeping the land, passed a weird and retarded law. Only women and pussy-whipped married men would ever pass such a bitchy law, but pass it did.
It bizarrely extended the purview of US law overseas! If an American man of any age goes to a foreign land and has sex with a girl or boy who is 17 years and 11 months old or younger, he goes down on US child molesting laws!
Although at first it would seem that US law should never extend to crimes committed in foreign lands, which are properly the purview of those foreign lands, Sexmaniacman realized that this happened for a reason.
Actual Western pedophiles were going to Philippines, Thailand and other places and having sex with really young kids, because it was more or less legal over there, and the locals didn't care. In order to put a stop to this, the US and Western Europe passed some laws to bust pedos when they went overseas to molest little kids.
Otherwise, Western pedos would run around the world seeking out 3rd World hellholes where no one cared about pedo stuff, and dollars shut up everyone. In order to put a stop to this, anti-pedo laws were passed in the West extending Western law to other nations.
Sexmaniacman thought long and hard about this, and finally decided that this was really weird and legally obtuse, but still unfortunately right and proper in the case of Westerners having sex with actual little kids, but not with teenagers.
One thing Sexmaniacman bemoaned with the coming of Child Molester Mass Hysteria was the extinction of statutory rape, a perfectly valid category, and its blurring with actual pedophilia with young kids. Child Molester Mass Hysteria came to America, and quickly, a 17-yr-old girl and a 9-yr-old girl were the same thing. They were both "children", and those of all ages who had sex fun with them were all sick evil pedo fucks.
Even teenage boys were going down on these sissy, bitchy pedo laws for the crime of proving their manliness by sticking it to their teenage girlfriends. It was as if Iraq or Iran had come to the USA. A 13-yr-old boy and his girl have some sex fun, videotape it on cell phones and pass it around. The boy, but not the girl, goes down on charges of distributing child pornography. Just as the feminazi bitches would have it.
The anti-pedo laws, the blurring of teenage sex fun with sick child sex, the idiot wind attacking virile teenage boys and young men - they were all part of the war American women and girls were waging on real American men and boys. The bitches' wormboy boyfriends, vaginized male allies and pussy-whipped husbands defending the chastity of teenage daughters - they were all behind this bullshit too.
Real American men and testosterone-charged American boys, the few that were left, should have stood up to this attack on manliness, but they were too scared of the pedo charge to speak up.
Millions of vaginized males and girlymen all over America stood up alongside their pants-wearing, hysterical girlfriends and wives, screeching defense of the fake honor of hymenless 17-yr-old girls all over our fair land.
There were some serious issues here. Sexmaniacman had to agree. What was to be done?
You couldn't exactly legalize sex between adults and teens all the way down to age 14 or so. Otherwise you would have guys 40 and 50 walking down the street in broad daylight with their 15-yr-old girlfriends in tow. Sexmaniacman decided that that would not do.
How's about we went back to the old days, Sexmaniacman suggested?
Two laws.
One called statutory rape, judiciously prosecuted against egregious cases of sex between men and girls and gay boys 14-17. Another, child molesting, for sex between adults and girls and boys under the age of 14.
Overseas, clearly there was a national interest in the West to stop pedos from heading to SE Asia to have sex with little kids. If the Thais won't stop it, doggone it, we will. Sexmaniacman nodded his approval.
But Sexmaniacman could see no national interest in busting a Western man of any age for messing with a teenage girl in some sweltering foreign land. That was beyond absurd.
Child porn. Sexmaniacman pondered the very phrase, and lately did so frequently, and he didn't even feel guilty. He loved to think about child porn, since it offered so many legal and philosophical quandaries.
Child porn! The phrase alone drove Americans to paroxysms of madness.
It actually posed a most difficult case, Sexmaniacman noted. To merely look at the stuff was a crime. Child porn was on the Net, and you could find it if you really, really tried. Could you stumble upon it? Highly dubious.
Sexmaniacman felt that in analogy, child porn seemed like the case of a book in a library. It sat on a special shelf called the Internet Shelf. The book was out there in plain view, but there were signs next to it saying DO NOT LOOK AT THIS BOOK! ILLEGAL! LOCAL ORDINANCE BLA BLA BLA! Now and again, some maniac thrillseeker would grab the book and sneak a glance at a few pages.
They would almost always be caught, and the police would haul them away. They would be bashed in the press and their communities as sickos for looking at a book in the library, and their careers and lives would be ruined.
Although this scenario seems absurd, Sexmaniacman realized that that's pretty much how it is with child porn. It's out there on the Net, but if you look at it, you're going to prison. It has to be just about one of the only things on Earth, Sexmaniacman noted, that, if you look at it, you go to prison. Think about it, real hard. Anything else illegal to steal a glance at? Anyone?
Sexmaniacman pondered the weird legal and philosophical arguments for why looking at something , say, child porn, or anything, really, should be illegal:
Child porn is the portrayal of a crime.
Therefore, when you look at it, you violate the kid's privacy. Ok, but the kid has no idea you looked at their pic. Sexmaniacman felt it was impossible to argue that by stealing a glance at their porn pic, you have psychically harmed this kid via telepathy.
Furthermore, Sexmaniacman pointed out that there are all sorts of videos out on the Net that depict crimes, sometimes homicides. You can even find them on this blog. Should those not be illegal too? After all, they portray a crime, no? Or should they be allowed because the victims are dead and can't be harmed anymore?
When you look at child porn, you create a market for it, and that makes producers abuse more kids.
Well, ok, Sexmaniacman nodded. But once again, the criminal appears to be the person who made the child porn, not some guy looking at a picture.
What about trafficking? Sexmaniacman agreed this was a tough one. Here things get more dicey. Now you are actually making money off kids getting molested. He noted that this is getting quite close to actual harm, but there are still some problems.
Sexmaniacman offered up the scenario of the stuff being traded back and forth by pedos for free. No profit is involved, but Sexmaniacman figured we can't really legalize it, can we? If we did, child porn trading sites would open up all over the web, and probably those who make the stuff would create more of it. Sexmaniacman felt that society had an interest in preventing that.
No matter that merely looking at the stuff constituted quite a bizarre sort of crime. Sexmaniacman offered up, "What if we acted logical and said it was legal to look at the stuff, but not to peddle it?" But then he noted that child porn sites would pop up all over the web, just for folks to "look at". Society clearly has an interest in preventing that.
As far as the Internet goes, Sexmaniacman felt that probably the present state of affairs is the best. Child porn is quite illegal, hence it is extremely difficult to find, although with enough effort and hours of searching by savvy Net users, it's surely out there. So child porn is rare and very hard to find. It's almost impossible to stumble upon it by accident. This is probably the way it ought to be, he agreed.
Sexmaniacman pointed out that if we allowed folks to look at it, websites would sprout up all over, and hundreds of thousands or millions of people would be looking at the stuff, just like they are feasting on all the other shock stuff out there. And that didn't seem right to Sexmaniacman.
Sexmaniacman bemoaned the fact that child porn, child molesting and statutory rape are subjects that are banned from polite conversation, and frankly all conversation, in today's Idiot America. The only talk allowed about these subjects is to rant about how we want to castrate the sick fucks who "molest". No problem ever got solved by not talking about it, or only talking stupid about it.
Just to piss people off and make them hate him more than they already did, Sexmaniacman deliberately brought up these subjects, especially in public, just to watch the freakouts and hard stares.
Despite the fact that hardly anyone was talking sensibly about this sick stuff but Sexmaniacman, he noted that these areas opened up a lot of interesting philosophical and legal dilemmas that do not have easy answers.
Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
A US diplomat goes to Brazil and "molests" some "little girls" aged 14-17, which Sexmaniacman assumed is perfectly legal in Brazil. He comes back to the US and gets arrested on "pedophile" charges.
A gay man "molests" a 15-year-old gay "little boy" prostitute in the Philippines, comes home to the US, and is arrested and labeled "pedophile". His arrest is uncovered when he goes to work for a local politician and his career is shot.
A local US mayor with long hair and a beard like a ZZ Top musician "molests" a 15-year-old "little girl". He's sentenced to prison and reviled by a town who hopes he stays away for a long time.
Roman Polanski gives a 13-year-old girl a Quaalude long ago, "molests" her, flees the phony prosecution for the sanity of France, where he remains to this day.
Mark Foley does little more than talk dirty to some "little boy" pages aged 16-17 (some of whom apparently enjoyed it), never touches any of them even once, and is labeled "pedophile".
In the UK, a father takes pictures of his kids on a slide in the park and insane irate mothers order him to stop taking pictures, and when he refuses, they go to the cops. Obviously he's a child molester. Whoops. He's just a father taking pics of his own kids.
Sexmaniacman looks at all the "pedophiles" above and cheers them on, despite the hysteria, although he thinks Mark Foley was an idiot. Sexmaniacman figures that if these guys want to have sex with teenagers, that's their business. Sexmaniacman realizes it's illegal, and he hopes he won't do it himself, but he can't see it as a sin.
We're in the midst of madness. Child Molester Mass Hysteria, to be precise.
Sexmaniacman did lots of "molesting", and had lots of fun, back in the day. He was 18, 19 and 20, and the women and "little girls" never stopped coming. The females were all ages, but plenty were 14, 15, 16 and 17. He had sex with them all, and then he got up in the morning and did it some more. He's proud of it to this very day. Nowadays, he'd be a "pedophile" for doing that. Back in the day, it was just good times.
Sexmaniacman had some "pedophile" friends. One was 28 years old, had a 16-yr-old "little girl" girlfriend, and "molested" her regularly.
Sexmaniacman cheered his friend on for this dastardly "pedophile" episode.
Sexmaniacman had another friend, Killerdude. He was 29 years old, and they were over at Killerdude's Mom's house getting high as kites and laughing their asses off. Killerdude's little sister's 15-yr-old girlfriend walked out of the bedroom and out the front door, waving goodbye. Killerdude confided to Sexmaniacman that he had just had sex with that "little girl" the other day.
His sister had approached Killerdude, said her friend wanted to have sex with him, and would he do it? He obviously obliged. What else could he do but "molest" her, right?
Sexmaniacman approved, and cheered his "pedophile" friend on.
Sexmaniacman gave up on the young girls when he turned 21. After that, they needed to be 18. In dubious cases, he even asked for ID.
Sexmaniacman read a pdf on the Net about Costa Rica. There are all kinds of American men down there having all sorts of sex fun with girls and women. In Costa Rica, a girl is a woman at age 13.
So you could say that Costa Rica is just a nation of sex perverts and child molesting sick fucks, and the whole country needs to be arrested. The males all need prison or castration or preferably both, and the females all need lifetime therapy for "getting molested".
Sexmaniacman cheers on Costa Rica in their freedom of choice and thumbing their nose at Child Molester Mass Hysteria.
There are men down there, American men, the pdf said, older guys, and some are having sex with underage girls. It didn't really give ages, but the implication was they were 14-17 years old. The guys were also doing it with women. They were just screwing anything, like any real man does if he gets a chance. The Costa Ricans wouldn't do anything about it because they didn't think it was a crime.
Sexmaniacman cheered them on, all of them, the American men doing this, the Costa Ricans for shrugging their shoulders, and the girls for having a good time. He didn't think he would want to go to Costa Rica, or any foreign land, and do it himself, since teenage girls hardly interested him much anymore, but he didn't care if another guy did.
The idiots in the US government, egged on by the Child Molester Mass Hysteria sweeping the land, passed a weird and retarded law. Only women and pussy-whipped married men would ever pass such a bitchy law, but pass it did.
It bizarrely extended the purview of US law overseas! If an American man of any age goes to a foreign land and has sex with a girl or boy who is 17 years and 11 months old or younger, he goes down on US child molesting laws!
Although at first it would seem that US law should never extend to crimes committed in foreign lands, which are properly the purview of those foreign lands, Sexmaniacman realized that this happened for a reason.
Actual Western pedophiles were going to Philippines, Thailand and other places and having sex with really young kids, because it was more or less legal over there, and the locals didn't care. In order to put a stop to this, the US and Western Europe passed some laws to bust pedos when they went overseas to molest little kids.
Otherwise, Western pedos would run around the world seeking out 3rd World hellholes where no one cared about pedo stuff, and dollars shut up everyone. In order to put a stop to this, anti-pedo laws were passed in the West extending Western law to other nations.
Sexmaniacman thought long and hard about this, and finally decided that this was really weird and legally obtuse, but still unfortunately right and proper in the case of Westerners having sex with actual little kids, but not with teenagers.
One thing Sexmaniacman bemoaned with the coming of Child Molester Mass Hysteria was the extinction of statutory rape, a perfectly valid category, and its blurring with actual pedophilia with young kids. Child Molester Mass Hysteria came to America, and quickly, a 17-yr-old girl and a 9-yr-old girl were the same thing. They were both "children", and those of all ages who had sex fun with them were all sick evil pedo fucks.
Even teenage boys were going down on these sissy, bitchy pedo laws for the crime of proving their manliness by sticking it to their teenage girlfriends. It was as if Iraq or Iran had come to the USA. A 13-yr-old boy and his girl have some sex fun, videotape it on cell phones and pass it around. The boy, but not the girl, goes down on charges of distributing child pornography. Just as the feminazi bitches would have it.
The anti-pedo laws, the blurring of teenage sex fun with sick child sex, the idiot wind attacking virile teenage boys and young men - they were all part of the war American women and girls were waging on real American men and boys. The bitches' wormboy boyfriends, vaginized male allies and pussy-whipped husbands defending the chastity of teenage daughters - they were all behind this bullshit too.
Real American men and testosterone-charged American boys, the few that were left, should have stood up to this attack on manliness, but they were too scared of the pedo charge to speak up.
Millions of vaginized males and girlymen all over America stood up alongside their pants-wearing, hysterical girlfriends and wives, screeching defense of the fake honor of hymenless 17-yr-old girls all over our fair land.
There were some serious issues here. Sexmaniacman had to agree. What was to be done?
You couldn't exactly legalize sex between adults and teens all the way down to age 14 or so. Otherwise you would have guys 40 and 50 walking down the street in broad daylight with their 15-yr-old girlfriends in tow. Sexmaniacman decided that that would not do.
How's about we went back to the old days, Sexmaniacman suggested?
Two laws.
One called statutory rape, judiciously prosecuted against egregious cases of sex between men and girls and gay boys 14-17. Another, child molesting, for sex between adults and girls and boys under the age of 14.
Overseas, clearly there was a national interest in the West to stop pedos from heading to SE Asia to have sex with little kids. If the Thais won't stop it, doggone it, we will. Sexmaniacman nodded his approval.
But Sexmaniacman could see no national interest in busting a Western man of any age for messing with a teenage girl in some sweltering foreign land. That was beyond absurd.
Child porn. Sexmaniacman pondered the very phrase, and lately did so frequently, and he didn't even feel guilty. He loved to think about child porn, since it offered so many legal and philosophical quandaries.
Child porn! The phrase alone drove Americans to paroxysms of madness.
It actually posed a most difficult case, Sexmaniacman noted. To merely look at the stuff was a crime. Child porn was on the Net, and you could find it if you really, really tried. Could you stumble upon it? Highly dubious.
Sexmaniacman felt that in analogy, child porn seemed like the case of a book in a library. It sat on a special shelf called the Internet Shelf. The book was out there in plain view, but there were signs next to it saying DO NOT LOOK AT THIS BOOK! ILLEGAL! LOCAL ORDINANCE BLA BLA BLA! Now and again, some maniac thrillseeker would grab the book and sneak a glance at a few pages.
They would almost always be caught, and the police would haul them away. They would be bashed in the press and their communities as sickos for looking at a book in the library, and their careers and lives would be ruined.
Although this scenario seems absurd, Sexmaniacman realized that that's pretty much how it is with child porn. It's out there on the Net, but if you look at it, you're going to prison. It has to be just about one of the only things on Earth, Sexmaniacman noted, that, if you look at it, you go to prison. Think about it, real hard. Anything else illegal to steal a glance at? Anyone?
Sexmaniacman pondered the weird legal and philosophical arguments for why looking at something , say, child porn, or anything, really, should be illegal:
Child porn is the portrayal of a crime.
Therefore, when you look at it, you violate the kid's privacy. Ok, but the kid has no idea you looked at their pic. Sexmaniacman felt it was impossible to argue that by stealing a glance at their porn pic, you have psychically harmed this kid via telepathy.
Furthermore, Sexmaniacman pointed out that there are all sorts of videos out on the Net that depict crimes, sometimes homicides. You can even find them on this blog. Should those not be illegal too? After all, they portray a crime, no? Or should they be allowed because the victims are dead and can't be harmed anymore?
When you look at child porn, you create a market for it, and that makes producers abuse more kids.
Well, ok, Sexmaniacman nodded. But once again, the criminal appears to be the person who made the child porn, not some guy looking at a picture.
What about trafficking? Sexmaniacman agreed this was a tough one. Here things get more dicey. Now you are actually making money off kids getting molested. He noted that this is getting quite close to actual harm, but there are still some problems.
Sexmaniacman offered up the scenario of the stuff being traded back and forth by pedos for free. No profit is involved, but Sexmaniacman figured we can't really legalize it, can we? If we did, child porn trading sites would open up all over the web, and probably those who make the stuff would create more of it. Sexmaniacman felt that society had an interest in preventing that.
No matter that merely looking at the stuff constituted quite a bizarre sort of crime. Sexmaniacman offered up, "What if we acted logical and said it was legal to look at the stuff, but not to peddle it?" But then he noted that child porn sites would pop up all over the web, just for folks to "look at". Society clearly has an interest in preventing that.
As far as the Internet goes, Sexmaniacman felt that probably the present state of affairs is the best. Child porn is quite illegal, hence it is extremely difficult to find, although with enough effort and hours of searching by savvy Net users, it's surely out there. So child porn is rare and very hard to find. It's almost impossible to stumble upon it by accident. This is probably the way it ought to be, he agreed.
Sexmaniacman pointed out that if we allowed folks to look at it, websites would sprout up all over, and hundreds of thousands or millions of people would be looking at the stuff, just like they are feasting on all the other shock stuff out there. And that didn't seem right to Sexmaniacman.
Sexmaniacman bemoaned the fact that child porn, child molesting and statutory rape are subjects that are banned from polite conversation, and frankly all conversation, in today's Idiot America. The only talk allowed about these subjects is to rant about how we want to castrate the sick fucks who "molest". No problem ever got solved by not talking about it, or only talking stupid about it.
Just to piss people off and make them hate him more than they already did, Sexmaniacman deliberately brought up these subjects, especially in public, just to watch the freakouts and hard stares.
Despite the fact that hardly anyone was talking sensibly about this sick stuff but Sexmaniacman, he noted that these areas opened up a lot of interesting philosophical and legal dilemmas that do not have easy answers.
Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
Friday, June 06, 2008
Hardcore Bachelor Blog
Pretty nasty and misogynistic stuff, but I guess, as a 50-yr-old hardcore (straight) bachelor - sorry, I have to say that because a lot of closeted gay guys used to call themselves "confirmed bachelors" - I ought to be cheering this site on in a way. There are definitely some truths here, if you winnow out the misogyny.
I never had anything against married men, but I always resisted marriage. After age 40, I was turning down one woman after another, as they kept frenetically trying to marry me.
Since 2005, I have decided I would like to get married, but I really don't give a damn if I ever do or not. I feel the same way about kids. This is actually a major breakthrough. At age 47, I broke down and not only admitted to horrible and dreaded possibility of marriage, but welcomed it with open arms and cheers of joy!
This article, Fuckers and Suckers, is pretty good. It's written from the POV of a sucker. I guess I must have been a fucker as a young man. Maybe that's why all those women and girls resented me so much. Even my Mom implied I was being a bastard! Horrors!
Or maybe I was a sucker? I remember this one woman, Denice, age 18, who I used to date. She openly said that I was boring, right to my face. Thanks bitch. Hell with her; she never totally put out anyway - it was all halfway stuff.
I don't know what I am now. By age 50, the fuckers/suckers thing has sort of faded away. Both parties are married with kids, the women are all going for the money, and most of them can't use their looks (sex) to buy the rich guys anymore, so the game is sort of up.
I'm not saying that all women use sex, their looks and their bodies to get money from men, but it's pretty common under capitalism. I'm not blaming women. If women paid us guys good money to screw em, we'd probably hold out too (or would we)?
I've heard all the lame female defenses for why "non-prostitutes" should charge money for sex.
1. Men have a much stronger sex drive.
Response: So therefore you have to be a whore?
2. "Non-whores" selling their bodies for top dollar are different from actual, real whores because real whores screw all kinds of guys, and the "non-whores" just screw (and screw over) one guy.
Response: Forget it. Your pussy, your beauty and your body is either for sale to the highest bidder or it's not. If it isn't, pat yourself on the back. If it is, you're a whore. Maybe you're a lot less skanky that the crackhead on the street over there, but hey, there are all kinds of whores in this world.
Maybe this shit made sense when women depended on a man's income to raise their children - then it has evolutionary value to grab a high-value guy who can provide you with sustenance. At this point, they pretty much make just as much money as we do when they aren't taking time off to have kids, so that argument goes out the window.
I've had girlfriends who made more money than I did, but I still had to pay for everything. I dated this one Black woman who was the greediest bitch I've ever met. She more or less charged for visits. In general, I was not even allowed to come over and visit unless I was going to part with some cash.
If I wanted to visit in the morning, I was buying brunch. Afternoon visit, I'm buying lunch. Night visit, I'm buying dinner. After a while I was tempted to just say, forget the food, here's $20, let's fuck. That's not all that much different from buying a hooker, although in this case, I probably would have been better off at the massage parlor or at the call girl's fancy apartment in Hollywood.
This woman was cynical. I got the impression that she hated men and she got this from her Black mother and her Black female relatives. The attitude was that all men are no-good dogs, so just use your pussy and your looks to milk them for every dime you can get out of them.
She loved to hear stories about call girls, and her eyes lit up when she heard how much money they made. So, not only was she a "non-whore" whore, she secretly wanted to be a real-whore whore to boot and double her luck, I guess.
This bitch wouldn't even pay the tip at the fancy restaurant. The way I saw it was all her money was for her and all my money was for her. This is progressive and egalitarian and feminist equal rights and all in exactly what way now? How about, it's none of the above? It's just a way for women to rip off men, and I'm calling 'em on it.
At this point, I'm pretty much resigned to it, and I figure women cost money, especially the really good-looking ones. Especially if they don't have much money themselves, I don't feel bad about throwing money in her direction. I do resent spending money on a woman who has plenty herself though. Screw that.
How come we never hear feminists talking about this? Where does a liberated woman get off making the guy pay for everything? Screw that. I don't think women are even oppressed anymore in the US. Most of my male friends think men are way more oppressed in the US now than women are.
I'd like to make a Commie point here: Capitalism turns women into a bunch of whores. Wonderful! Great system!
There are some pretty cool links on there. Websites, blogs and articles: Don't Marry, Dump Your Wife Now, No Marriage, Uzem and Luzem, American Women Suck and Confession of a Feminazi.
Confession of a Feminazi was particularly chilling.
I'm going to reserve judgment on this stuff for now and give you a chance to look it over and make up your own mind.
One complaint: I sure wish this guy would learn how to spell or write a proper grammatical sentence. It really bothers me when American native-English speakers can't even seem to do that.
Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
I never had anything against married men, but I always resisted marriage. After age 40, I was turning down one woman after another, as they kept frenetically trying to marry me.
Since 2005, I have decided I would like to get married, but I really don't give a damn if I ever do or not. I feel the same way about kids. This is actually a major breakthrough. At age 47, I broke down and not only admitted to horrible and dreaded possibility of marriage, but welcomed it with open arms and cheers of joy!
This article, Fuckers and Suckers, is pretty good. It's written from the POV of a sucker. I guess I must have been a fucker as a young man. Maybe that's why all those women and girls resented me so much. Even my Mom implied I was being a bastard! Horrors!
Or maybe I was a sucker? I remember this one woman, Denice, age 18, who I used to date. She openly said that I was boring, right to my face. Thanks bitch. Hell with her; she never totally put out anyway - it was all halfway stuff.
I don't know what I am now. By age 50, the fuckers/suckers thing has sort of faded away. Both parties are married with kids, the women are all going for the money, and most of them can't use their looks (sex) to buy the rich guys anymore, so the game is sort of up.
I'm not saying that all women use sex, their looks and their bodies to get money from men, but it's pretty common under capitalism. I'm not blaming women. If women paid us guys good money to screw em, we'd probably hold out too (or would we)?
I've heard all the lame female defenses for why "non-prostitutes" should charge money for sex.
1. Men have a much stronger sex drive.
Response: So therefore you have to be a whore?
2. "Non-whores" selling their bodies for top dollar are different from actual, real whores because real whores screw all kinds of guys, and the "non-whores" just screw (and screw over) one guy.
Response: Forget it. Your pussy, your beauty and your body is either for sale to the highest bidder or it's not. If it isn't, pat yourself on the back. If it is, you're a whore. Maybe you're a lot less skanky that the crackhead on the street over there, but hey, there are all kinds of whores in this world.
Maybe this shit made sense when women depended on a man's income to raise their children - then it has evolutionary value to grab a high-value guy who can provide you with sustenance. At this point, they pretty much make just as much money as we do when they aren't taking time off to have kids, so that argument goes out the window.
I've had girlfriends who made more money than I did, but I still had to pay for everything. I dated this one Black woman who was the greediest bitch I've ever met. She more or less charged for visits. In general, I was not even allowed to come over and visit unless I was going to part with some cash.
If I wanted to visit in the morning, I was buying brunch. Afternoon visit, I'm buying lunch. Night visit, I'm buying dinner. After a while I was tempted to just say, forget the food, here's $20, let's fuck. That's not all that much different from buying a hooker, although in this case, I probably would have been better off at the massage parlor or at the call girl's fancy apartment in Hollywood.
This woman was cynical. I got the impression that she hated men and she got this from her Black mother and her Black female relatives. The attitude was that all men are no-good dogs, so just use your pussy and your looks to milk them for every dime you can get out of them.
She loved to hear stories about call girls, and her eyes lit up when she heard how much money they made. So, not only was she a "non-whore" whore, she secretly wanted to be a real-whore whore to boot and double her luck, I guess.
This bitch wouldn't even pay the tip at the fancy restaurant. The way I saw it was all her money was for her and all my money was for her. This is progressive and egalitarian and feminist equal rights and all in exactly what way now? How about, it's none of the above? It's just a way for women to rip off men, and I'm calling 'em on it.
At this point, I'm pretty much resigned to it, and I figure women cost money, especially the really good-looking ones. Especially if they don't have much money themselves, I don't feel bad about throwing money in her direction. I do resent spending money on a woman who has plenty herself though. Screw that.
How come we never hear feminists talking about this? Where does a liberated woman get off making the guy pay for everything? Screw that. I don't think women are even oppressed anymore in the US. Most of my male friends think men are way more oppressed in the US now than women are.
I'd like to make a Commie point here: Capitalism turns women into a bunch of whores. Wonderful! Great system!
There are some pretty cool links on there. Websites, blogs and articles: Don't Marry, Dump Your Wife Now, No Marriage, Uzem and Luzem, American Women Suck and Confession of a Feminazi.
Confession of a Feminazi was particularly chilling.
I'm going to reserve judgment on this stuff for now and give you a chance to look it over and make up your own mind.
One complaint: I sure wish this guy would learn how to spell or write a proper grammatical sentence. It really bothers me when American native-English speakers can't even seem to do that.
Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Cavewomen and Wormboys
A fellow named Zsidozas comments on the Race, Gender and Masculinity/Femininity post. My comments follow:
Now if you go over to San Francisco, it is a totally different story. The Northern California male is said to be so feminized that many people think that they are gay. Convsersely, the women are often said to be quite masculinized. I never heard this too much when I was in Southern California.
I do not know why this is, but for instance, my brother knows this older guy was paints his toenails like a woman. I heard that and freaked out. I said, "Is he gay?!" Because I think it sucks for a guy to paint his toenails. My brother answered, "No, he is just a Northern California male."
There are some others like that, including a guy well-known to both of us. I will note: "Sometime he acts like a total fag! What the Hell is the matter with him anyway?!" And then I will imitate his ridiculously faggy behavior. My brother responds that this guy is a Northern California male.
Now this guy hooked up with and later lived with a woman for a while who was quite masculine, and I'm not sure what kind of a relationship they had, but they did seem to be happy, so I was very, very happy for them and especially for him, as I have known him forever.
At one point, the relationship started ending, and I heard she was bi or lesbian or something and she had moved her girlfriend into the house with our friend.
Now, this could be fun if they guy got into the sex, but I do not think so. Last I heard she has living with her lez girlfriend.
There is another older guy close to us who has many extremely faggy characteristics: walks like a fag, talks like a fag, etc. I will say: "That guy acts gay!!" and someone will chide me, responding that he's been married five times.
He has some kind of weird relationship with his wife now where he acts all feminine or like a little boy or something, and she thinks it's really cute, and I guess afterwards they fuck like crazy. Whatever. I am happy for both of them though, because she has made a lifetime project out of being miserable, and the guy is at least getting laid, and I cheer that on in all males.
There is another one living in San Francisco married to someone close to us. Everyone (all my close relatives) insists that he acts gay but I do not think he does at all. I just think he acts like me. Hmmmm. But they are very happy together also, so I am happy for them too.
I do not know about Arabs. I dated an Arab woman once, a woman from Egypt who was part Black. She was quite submissive, not bossy or aggressive or anything like that. She was Muslim, but that never got in the way of sex. In fact, she was so incredible that I think I want another one of those Arab women!
I do not think that Arab women are bossy or domineering in their relationships with men, though some are. Saddam's Hussein's Dad was supposedly horribly pussy-whipped by his Mom. I suspect it is probably more common that one might think.
The Philippines has a reputation for being a very sexist place where the males are very macho and do not really treat women all that well. Like Arabs, they frequently beat their women. However, a Filipina I know told me that there is a saying called, "under the saya", which means that a Filipino man is basically pussy-whipped. Saya is skirt.
So he's under his wife's skirt and she controls him. I asked if this was common, and she said it was very common. Keep in mind that in the Philippines, the Arab World and Asia, the woman rules the home. The man just needs to keep out of there.
I read an interview with an Egyptian man and his sons living at home in Cairo. The living room was decorated in frilly pink feminine stuff and the interviewer asked this macho Arab husband if he liked it this way, and he said basically, "Well, it's her house and she can decorate it any way she wants to." I assume the males have some control over the way they want their particular inhabited spaces decorated.
In these places, often the woman controls all the money for the couple, and makes all decisions about household expenditures. My Mom told me a story about a Japanese couple who came to look at a house a friend of hers was selling. The seller asked the Japanese man if he was interested, and he said something like, "That decision is left up to her."
In other words, this poor oppressed Japanese woman actually gets decide what house they buy! It seems to me that these women are not as oppressed as we think that they are, and many Japanese and Arab women resent Westerners and feminists sticking their noses in Japanese or Arab culture and telling them that they are oppressed.
You're often going to get people's patriotic backs up when you do that. Better to let some folks negotiate their way to liberation by themselves.
Jews and Arabs are both highly emotional probably because that is a "Mediterraneanism". In other words, most of the folks in that part of the world tend to act that way.
Arab guys put their arms around each other because this is common in many parts of the world. I had a friend from China who was always trying to put his arm around me in public.
I see Mexican Indian farm workers in town who often walk around with their arms around each other, especially when drunk. I think it is an "Indianism", as you don't see the other Mexicans doing that. This male buddiness does not seem associated with homosexuality in these Indians and it is not in the Chinese.
The Arab World is quite complex. In the Levant and Mesopotamia, homosexuality is despised and treated very harshly, not uncommonly with death. In the Gulf, especially in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, opportunistic or even preferential bisexuality is very common and in fact, the religious police often look the other way, as they are more concerned about men and women together! Stupid or what?!
In Egypt, there is fairly free and easy bisexuality among unmarried males, which they may continue after marriage. This is a lot more common in Nubia in Southern Egypt, where people are a lot Blacker, and there is actually a long tradition of that stuff.
In Cairo and in Morocco, many males will play the male role in homosexual sex with a "gay" male, who plays the female role. In many cultures, it's not considered gay to play the male role in gay sex. Most guys who do this are young unmarried males. This is what happens when you forbid young males with a stratospheric sex drive female outlets: they screw each other.
I don't find Arab males feminine at all. In fact, I find them ultra-macho.
The commenter asks about Jewish men and women. Well, I don't think Jewish guys have a reputation for being feminine so much as wimpy. Wimpy and oversexed at the same time! So that is not quite the same thing.
And there is the stereotype of the Jewish woman as neurotic, insecure (she hates her looks and longs to be a blond), controlling, addicted to cheap, tacky and gaudy clothing and jewelry, domineering, histrionic (drama queen), and in particular constantly badgering him to make more money.
There were horror stories by Jewish men about Jewish women dating all the way back 100 years ago to the early Jewish press on the East Coast of the US. In many ways, this stereotype has not changed. The Jewish guy is supposed to marry a Jewish girl, but he often resents their domineering nature, and the stereotype is he wants a blonde shiska. Jewish women, like Black women, complain that their men don't want them.
But most Jews do still marry their own. On the plus side, Jewish women can be very nurturing, and in my opinion, they can be real Stand By Your Man types. I had a Jewish girlfriend who everyone thought was a bitch. People thought she treated me like crap in public and would say, "I hate the way she talks to you!"
Well, in the relationship, she started out as a bitch sometimes, but I turned the tables on that pretty quickly!
I forgot her birthday, forgot our anniversary, got in a big fight with her on her birthday (The most evil, cruel, mean, horrible and insensitive thing I could have done!), calmly laughed in her face at her horrible insults, made her cry repeatedly, called her a bitch and a cunt and all sorts of other horrible names I have never called any woman, and this was one of the best relationships of my life.
She hated me at times, but she hated me for being a man. She called me cruel, mean, asshole, jerk, evil and wicked, and at the end she called me Hitler.
She would horribly insult me to my face. I would respond, "Shut the fuck up, you stupid fucking cunt. Shut up, you dumb bitch, etc., etc," real calm and assured-like.
After a few minutes of that, she would be blubbering like a little girl, "Oh, I adore you so much. Oh, I love you so much. I love you baby. Let's get married, etc. etc."
Oh man! Isn't love grand!
It's a horrible cliche, but a lot of these real bitchy types are really looking for a hard, masculine man to put them in their place and turn them into a feminine, blubbering little schoolgirl in love again. These bitches always go after wimpy guys, because they love to dominate them, or they think they love to dominate them, but that just doesn't seem to work, as it violates nature.
I don't like to be Mr. Advice Column on here, but at 50, it has occurred to me someone is going to wear the pants in a heterosexual relationship.
If you don't, she will.
If she suspects you have taken off the pants for a while, she will try to make a power grab to put the pants on herself. This must be stopped, often harshly, with profanities, harsh words, meanness, threats to leave, etc.
Usually she will back down completely and start bubbering and even whimpering apologetically and asking, "Are you mad? You're not mad, are you?" Assure you that you are not but issue an order that she is not to speak to you like that anymore, as you really, really hate it.
Women want to take control, but really a lot of times they hate it, because at the same time, I think that even masculinized Western women are disgusted by their vaginized metrosexual wormboy partners. You can wage cultural revolution and gender bend til the cows come home, but at the end of the day, I am convinced that you can't fool Mother Nature.
Of course we are products of our evolution. In many ways, we are also prisoners. < Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
Zsidozas comments: A personal story - as a White American male I've encountered much hostility from White females because I am not an effete and feminized White American male like so many of the others are these days. I am more aggressive, dominant, and masculine than the majority of White males for sure, but I try to temper this by my strong orientation toward reason, rationality, and learning.Ok, first of all, I do not understand why women would hate an overly aggressive or masculine man, even in the feminized US. But I won't deny you the reality of your experiences. Around here, most of the White guys are pretty machoed out.
So yeah, I've encountered problems with White women because many view me as an overly aggressive, pushy, and angry asshole / jerk / brute / prick / Viking / Neanderthal, of which I am not at all, but they only view me that way because I am quite a bit more masculine than most White men (who I agree are, on the whole, far too wimpy and resigned for their own good).
I am not a bodybuilder or football player or anything like that, so it's not like I am afflicted by the 'macho male complex' that men like that suffer from.
So I've noticed that many White women think of me as something a bit unnatural or strange and view me with some contempt and suspicion because I am not easily dominated and controlled like the rest of White men.
In fact, I'll argue and bicker with women (of whatever ethnicity) until we are all blue in the face if I believe something strongly as I'm not afraid to back down like so many modern men are -- and I usually win those arguments.
And when I do win those arguments, believe it or not I've had women get violent with me either playfully or for real, like they are trying to get back at me physically for 'beating them' mentally and emotionally in an argument when they are just so used to lording over modern men.
It seems as if many White women, if they date or marry White men as most do, actually sort-of want or prefer a push-over who they can easily control, manipulate, and dominate in many ways (though they still want the man to bring them home some money, of course).
I think this is a rather recent development and a major reason why gender relations are so screwed up in the modern Western White world, particularly in America.
A quick story: I was at a party with my girlfriend the other night that was mostly populated by a bunch of drunken lesbians and overly masculine (but straight) White females, along with their feminized male lackeys. And one of them, in a drunken and pilled-up stupor actually said to me and me girlfriend as we were talking to her [paraphrasing]: "I love to emasculate men. I just like it. It's fun. I do it all the time at work."
And she said it sort-of at me and my girlfriend, like almost a veiled insult toward me or something. I continued to laugh with her and joked around and such, but still I think it was like a veiled insult toward me because she recognized in me a man who refused to be emasculated and feminized like so many modern men.
So I laughed and joked (but was secretly disgusted toward her that she would actually take pleasure in mentally emasculating men and fucking with their egos).
Lame story, but I think it illustrates a decent point about the attitude of most modern White women.
Also, you didn't mention Semitic peoples here like Jews and Arabs. But just a thought: Jewish males are certainly very effeminate (as effeminate as many Asian men, often more), and Jewish females very masculine (maybe even as masculine as Black women).
Ditto with Arabs -- and maybe this is why Arab men are so severe toward their women, like they want to keep them in check or something? Most Jewish and Arab females have, I've noticed, many masculine physical traits like deep/husky voices and hairy bodies, while many Jewish/Arab men have many feminine traits like higher pitched voices and moodiness/high emotionality.
Many men in Arab countries also engage in some behaviors that are considered effeminate or even gayish here in The West like holding hands as they walk together and kissing each other a lot, but they don't think anything of it over there.
However, there is still something that is just intrinsically aggressive about both Jews and Arabs that I can't pin down yet, though I'm looking for reasons -- maybe it's their rather fanatical ethnocentrism? So, if possible, I'd like your thoughts on Semitics (however brief) as well if you don't mind.
Now if you go over to San Francisco, it is a totally different story. The Northern California male is said to be so feminized that many people think that they are gay. Convsersely, the women are often said to be quite masculinized. I never heard this too much when I was in Southern California.
I do not know why this is, but for instance, my brother knows this older guy was paints his toenails like a woman. I heard that and freaked out. I said, "Is he gay?!" Because I think it sucks for a guy to paint his toenails. My brother answered, "No, he is just a Northern California male."
There are some others like that, including a guy well-known to both of us. I will note: "Sometime he acts like a total fag! What the Hell is the matter with him anyway?!" And then I will imitate his ridiculously faggy behavior. My brother responds that this guy is a Northern California male.
Now this guy hooked up with and later lived with a woman for a while who was quite masculine, and I'm not sure what kind of a relationship they had, but they did seem to be happy, so I was very, very happy for them and especially for him, as I have known him forever.
At one point, the relationship started ending, and I heard she was bi or lesbian or something and she had moved her girlfriend into the house with our friend.
Now, this could be fun if they guy got into the sex, but I do not think so. Last I heard she has living with her lez girlfriend.
There is another older guy close to us who has many extremely faggy characteristics: walks like a fag, talks like a fag, etc. I will say: "That guy acts gay!!" and someone will chide me, responding that he's been married five times.
He has some kind of weird relationship with his wife now where he acts all feminine or like a little boy or something, and she thinks it's really cute, and I guess afterwards they fuck like crazy. Whatever. I am happy for both of them though, because she has made a lifetime project out of being miserable, and the guy is at least getting laid, and I cheer that on in all males.
There is another one living in San Francisco married to someone close to us. Everyone (all my close relatives) insists that he acts gay but I do not think he does at all. I just think he acts like me. Hmmmm. But they are very happy together also, so I am happy for them too.
I do not know about Arabs. I dated an Arab woman once, a woman from Egypt who was part Black. She was quite submissive, not bossy or aggressive or anything like that. She was Muslim, but that never got in the way of sex. In fact, she was so incredible that I think I want another one of those Arab women!
I do not think that Arab women are bossy or domineering in their relationships with men, though some are. Saddam's Hussein's Dad was supposedly horribly pussy-whipped by his Mom. I suspect it is probably more common that one might think.
The Philippines has a reputation for being a very sexist place where the males are very macho and do not really treat women all that well. Like Arabs, they frequently beat their women. However, a Filipina I know told me that there is a saying called, "under the saya", which means that a Filipino man is basically pussy-whipped. Saya is skirt.
So he's under his wife's skirt and she controls him. I asked if this was common, and she said it was very common. Keep in mind that in the Philippines, the Arab World and Asia, the woman rules the home. The man just needs to keep out of there.
I read an interview with an Egyptian man and his sons living at home in Cairo. The living room was decorated in frilly pink feminine stuff and the interviewer asked this macho Arab husband if he liked it this way, and he said basically, "Well, it's her house and she can decorate it any way she wants to." I assume the males have some control over the way they want their particular inhabited spaces decorated.
In these places, often the woman controls all the money for the couple, and makes all decisions about household expenditures. My Mom told me a story about a Japanese couple who came to look at a house a friend of hers was selling. The seller asked the Japanese man if he was interested, and he said something like, "That decision is left up to her."
In other words, this poor oppressed Japanese woman actually gets decide what house they buy! It seems to me that these women are not as oppressed as we think that they are, and many Japanese and Arab women resent Westerners and feminists sticking their noses in Japanese or Arab culture and telling them that they are oppressed.
You're often going to get people's patriotic backs up when you do that. Better to let some folks negotiate their way to liberation by themselves.
Jews and Arabs are both highly emotional probably because that is a "Mediterraneanism". In other words, most of the folks in that part of the world tend to act that way.
Arab guys put their arms around each other because this is common in many parts of the world. I had a friend from China who was always trying to put his arm around me in public.
I see Mexican Indian farm workers in town who often walk around with their arms around each other, especially when drunk. I think it is an "Indianism", as you don't see the other Mexicans doing that. This male buddiness does not seem associated with homosexuality in these Indians and it is not in the Chinese.
The Arab World is quite complex. In the Levant and Mesopotamia, homosexuality is despised and treated very harshly, not uncommonly with death. In the Gulf, especially in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, opportunistic or even preferential bisexuality is very common and in fact, the religious police often look the other way, as they are more concerned about men and women together! Stupid or what?!
In Egypt, there is fairly free and easy bisexuality among unmarried males, which they may continue after marriage. This is a lot more common in Nubia in Southern Egypt, where people are a lot Blacker, and there is actually a long tradition of that stuff.
In Cairo and in Morocco, many males will play the male role in homosexual sex with a "gay" male, who plays the female role. In many cultures, it's not considered gay to play the male role in gay sex. Most guys who do this are young unmarried males. This is what happens when you forbid young males with a stratospheric sex drive female outlets: they screw each other.
I don't find Arab males feminine at all. In fact, I find them ultra-macho.
The commenter asks about Jewish men and women. Well, I don't think Jewish guys have a reputation for being feminine so much as wimpy. Wimpy and oversexed at the same time! So that is not quite the same thing.
And there is the stereotype of the Jewish woman as neurotic, insecure (she hates her looks and longs to be a blond), controlling, addicted to cheap, tacky and gaudy clothing and jewelry, domineering, histrionic (drama queen), and in particular constantly badgering him to make more money.
There were horror stories by Jewish men about Jewish women dating all the way back 100 years ago to the early Jewish press on the East Coast of the US. In many ways, this stereotype has not changed. The Jewish guy is supposed to marry a Jewish girl, but he often resents their domineering nature, and the stereotype is he wants a blonde shiska. Jewish women, like Black women, complain that their men don't want them.
But most Jews do still marry their own. On the plus side, Jewish women can be very nurturing, and in my opinion, they can be real Stand By Your Man types. I had a Jewish girlfriend who everyone thought was a bitch. People thought she treated me like crap in public and would say, "I hate the way she talks to you!"
Well, in the relationship, she started out as a bitch sometimes, but I turned the tables on that pretty quickly!
I forgot her birthday, forgot our anniversary, got in a big fight with her on her birthday (The most evil, cruel, mean, horrible and insensitive thing I could have done!), calmly laughed in her face at her horrible insults, made her cry repeatedly, called her a bitch and a cunt and all sorts of other horrible names I have never called any woman, and this was one of the best relationships of my life.
She hated me at times, but she hated me for being a man. She called me cruel, mean, asshole, jerk, evil and wicked, and at the end she called me Hitler.
She would horribly insult me to my face. I would respond, "Shut the fuck up, you stupid fucking cunt. Shut up, you dumb bitch, etc., etc," real calm and assured-like.
After a few minutes of that, she would be blubbering like a little girl, "Oh, I adore you so much. Oh, I love you so much. I love you baby. Let's get married, etc. etc."
Oh man! Isn't love grand!
It's a horrible cliche, but a lot of these real bitchy types are really looking for a hard, masculine man to put them in their place and turn them into a feminine, blubbering little schoolgirl in love again. These bitches always go after wimpy guys, because they love to dominate them, or they think they love to dominate them, but that just doesn't seem to work, as it violates nature.
I don't like to be Mr. Advice Column on here, but at 50, it has occurred to me someone is going to wear the pants in a heterosexual relationship.
If you don't, she will.
If she suspects you have taken off the pants for a while, she will try to make a power grab to put the pants on herself. This must be stopped, often harshly, with profanities, harsh words, meanness, threats to leave, etc.
Usually she will back down completely and start bubbering and even whimpering apologetically and asking, "Are you mad? You're not mad, are you?" Assure you that you are not but issue an order that she is not to speak to you like that anymore, as you really, really hate it.
Women want to take control, but really a lot of times they hate it, because at the same time, I think that even masculinized Western women are disgusted by their vaginized metrosexual wormboy partners. You can wage cultural revolution and gender bend til the cows come home, but at the end of the day, I am convinced that you can't fool Mother Nature.
Of course we are products of our evolution. In many ways, we are also prisoners. < Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
Monday, May 26, 2008
Race, Gender and Masculinity/Femininity
Steve Sailer got pilloried for saying what I will repeat and elaborate on below, but I really do think that he was onto something.
Truth is, men want a woman who is somewhat more feminine and women want a man who is somewhat more masculine.
White men think a lot of White women are bitches (too masculine), so they go for Asian women, who are relatively more feminine. White men avoid Black women, as they are even more masculine that White women.
A lot of White women think White guys are wimps, so they go for Black guys who are more masculine. An Asian guy is even more feminine than a White guy, so forget that.
Black women like Black men, since both are masculine. They think White guys are wimpy, and Asians are out of the question.
Black men want a woman who is more feminine, so they go for White women. Asians would be nice, but they are probably out of reach.
Asian women want a guy who is more masculine, so they go for a White guy. A Black guy is probably so overmasculine that he seems scary.
The losers in this game are Black women and Asian men, at least in the US. The above only applies to the US. In Asia, Asian men seem just fine because there are no White men to compare them too. In societies with few Blacks, White men may seem just fine to most White women. In Black societies, Black men come to appreciate Black women as there is no one to compare to.
There is actually some good evidence that all of the above is occurring. I am involved in a Yahoo group about romance fraud on the web. This group is swarming with White women who are hooking up with Black men. There is also good evidence that large numbers of Asian women are going for White guys.
Asian men are also extremely sexist (as their cultures dictate) so many Asian women think a White guy is going to treat them better.
Black men have told me that Black women think White guys are wimps, and my not-so-great experience dating Black women (Hopefully not to be repeated!) tells me the same thing. Black women are also the most cynical, manipulative and materialistic women I ever dated, but I've only dated a few.
I actually never considered Asian guys wimpy or feminine at all, since they have cultivated a culture of extreme sexism, contempt for homosexuality, and respect for classic masculine and male norms.
However, there is a lot of anecdotal evidence out there that many Asian women in the US are finding many Asian guys to be feminine (they are saying this because they now compare Asian men with White men, whereas in Asia there are only Asian men, so Asian guys seem fine). Asian men do lack body hair, etc. and probably have lower testosterone.
You can go to Asian nationalist sites in the US that are swarming with furious young single Asian men ranting about so many of their women dating White guys. They are also cultivating an image of masculinity, with lots of posts about Asian athletes and famous Asian warriors. They seem to want to date White women as a way to get even, or even get some period, so there are lots of posts about Asian guys and White women.
There also seems to be a tendency that the female goes for the more masculine guy, and then he treats her like crap. For instance, we have tons of stories of White women going for Black guys due to their being more masculine, and then the guy just refuses to work and lives off the woman, cheats on her and treats her like crap. She puts up with it because she wants a masculine man so badly.
We are also hearing of many Asian female - White male relationships where the same thing is going on - the White male refuses to work and just lives off the woman, cheats on her and treats her like crap. She puts up with it once again because she wants to be with a masculine man so much she will tolerate being mistreated.
It even works within races. I'm White, and since high school, I have been hearing nice guys wail about how women and girls won't fuck them and even treat them like crap and how the biggest assholes who treat women like total shit have women coming out their ears. Women say they want a nice guy, but then they get with one, and his niceness seems wimpy to them, so they go for a more masculine guy who treats her poorly.
Obviously, there are a lot of folks for whom this stuff doesn't apply, but I think that Sailer has hit on something here.
Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
Truth is, men want a woman who is somewhat more feminine and women want a man who is somewhat more masculine.
White men think a lot of White women are bitches (too masculine), so they go for Asian women, who are relatively more feminine. White men avoid Black women, as they are even more masculine that White women.
A lot of White women think White guys are wimps, so they go for Black guys who are more masculine. An Asian guy is even more feminine than a White guy, so forget that.
Black women like Black men, since both are masculine. They think White guys are wimpy, and Asians are out of the question.
Black men want a woman who is more feminine, so they go for White women. Asians would be nice, but they are probably out of reach.
Asian women want a guy who is more masculine, so they go for a White guy. A Black guy is probably so overmasculine that he seems scary.
The losers in this game are Black women and Asian men, at least in the US. The above only applies to the US. In Asia, Asian men seem just fine because there are no White men to compare them too. In societies with few Blacks, White men may seem just fine to most White women. In Black societies, Black men come to appreciate Black women as there is no one to compare to.
There is actually some good evidence that all of the above is occurring. I am involved in a Yahoo group about romance fraud on the web. This group is swarming with White women who are hooking up with Black men. There is also good evidence that large numbers of Asian women are going for White guys.
Asian men are also extremely sexist (as their cultures dictate) so many Asian women think a White guy is going to treat them better.
Black men have told me that Black women think White guys are wimps, and my not-so-great experience dating Black women (Hopefully not to be repeated!) tells me the same thing. Black women are also the most cynical, manipulative and materialistic women I ever dated, but I've only dated a few.
I actually never considered Asian guys wimpy or feminine at all, since they have cultivated a culture of extreme sexism, contempt for homosexuality, and respect for classic masculine and male norms.
However, there is a lot of anecdotal evidence out there that many Asian women in the US are finding many Asian guys to be feminine (they are saying this because they now compare Asian men with White men, whereas in Asia there are only Asian men, so Asian guys seem fine). Asian men do lack body hair, etc. and probably have lower testosterone.
You can go to Asian nationalist sites in the US that are swarming with furious young single Asian men ranting about so many of their women dating White guys. They are also cultivating an image of masculinity, with lots of posts about Asian athletes and famous Asian warriors. They seem to want to date White women as a way to get even, or even get some period, so there are lots of posts about Asian guys and White women.
There also seems to be a tendency that the female goes for the more masculine guy, and then he treats her like crap. For instance, we have tons of stories of White women going for Black guys due to their being more masculine, and then the guy just refuses to work and lives off the woman, cheats on her and treats her like crap. She puts up with it because she wants a masculine man so badly.
We are also hearing of many Asian female - White male relationships where the same thing is going on - the White male refuses to work and just lives off the woman, cheats on her and treats her like crap. She puts up with it once again because she wants to be with a masculine man so much she will tolerate being mistreated.
It even works within races. I'm White, and since high school, I have been hearing nice guys wail about how women and girls won't fuck them and even treat them like crap and how the biggest assholes who treat women like total shit have women coming out their ears. Women say they want a nice guy, but then they get with one, and his niceness seems wimpy to them, so they go for a more masculine guy who treats her poorly.
Obviously, there are a lot of folks for whom this stuff doesn't apply, but I think that Sailer has hit on something here.
Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
The Young Girls Loved the Teacher
The teacher had fun. He had fun and fun and more fun. There were girls all the time, from age 13-18, and many were beautiful. He was 26-33 years old, and he loved teenage girls just like any normal man does. He never got any complaints for looking at the girls or even participating in the flirting that they endlessly started.
The truth is that female students, especially aged 17-18 and in particular Hispanics, loved to flirt with the teacher. The teacher loved it! He loved it when the teenage girls looked at him and flirted with him! They loved it too! Everyone was happy. Everyone but the feminists.
The girls would come up to the teacher and give him their phone number and tell him to call them. He would take the #'s home and think about them at night alone in his place and dream and have wild sexual fantasies about sex with 18-yr-old girls.
The teacher sat in the library one day in Compton. The seniors were Blacks and Samoans. By this age, Compton students are some of the best on Earth. No one will do any work at all, but all the bad ones are just gone. The only students there are warming a seat to graduate.
Both Blacks and Samoans, if they are in a good mood, are some of the funnest races to be around. They love life, love to laugh and joke, and take it easy. The 18-year-old Black girl kept staring at the teacher. "How old are you?" she asked. "Thirty-two", he said. "I've been looking for a boyfriend right around that age," she said, and that was that.
The teacher was 27 years old and 13-year-old girls still looked pretty great to him, just like Lolita. The teacher is now 50, and as he has advanced in age, 13-year-olds looked more and more like little girls with each passing year. But back at age 27, a 13-year-old girl was a delicious and wonderful object of fantasy.
The class in Harbor City was yelling at the teacher. The gorgeous 13-yr-old White girl in the back of the room wanted to have sex with the teacher! They were all yelling!
"Hey! She wants to have sex with you!" the students yelled. The teacher looked over at the beautiful and well-developed Lolita and she looked at him and nodded her head enthusiastically, while still looking embarrassed and shy.
The teacher got up out of his seat and risked his very job. He walked towards the girl. "Really?" he asked. "You really want to have sex with me?" She nodded her head enthusiastically with the same embarrassed look. The teacher laughed. "Where?" he asked. "Where are we going to do it?"
"The park! The park!" the kids all yelled. "She wants you to meet her in the park after school so she can have sex with you!" The teacher looked back at her and she was nodding her head once again. "Well, I don't know," he said, chuckling, and went back to his desk and started reading the cheap, tacky detective novel from the 1940's.
One day the teacher taught 10th grade in Lynwood. There were mostly Hispanic girls in the class. It was early in the morning. She girls were all about 15. The teacher was bored and so was the class.
Suddenly the teacher looked up. There was a sea of panties flashing him in class! Around 6-7 of the 15-year-old Hispanic girls had gotten together to conspire to flash the teacher. They had hiked up their skirts in a way that you could see their panties, and yes, they were all wearing panties. The teacher tried to ignore it, but he could not. He kept looking back.
Then the girls all started calling the teacher a pervert! The teacher thought this was most unfair, but the mind of a female is unfathomable in the best of times.
The teacher was teaching Hispanics again, assimilated ones this time, in La Puente. He was 32. In senior class, the girls kept coming up to the teacher over and over, 17 and 18-year-old Hispanic girls, and asking to have their work checked or have notes written for them.
Most of the reasons were completely phony and were just ruses to get next to the teacher. The girls would get right next to the teacher and violate his space totally and try to almost rub up against him with their phony requests. They especially loved to bend over and wave their tits nearly right in his face or up against his body. The teacher went along with it; he was having a blast! A great time was had by all!
The teacher was 29 years old and it was a White middle class school in Hacienda Heights. The class was freshmen - 14 year olds. The teacher walked down the aisle, and as moved by, the girls reached out and tried to grab his ass as he walked by, but they would always miss on purpose, and then giggle to their friends about it. After a while, the teacher figured it out, but he just let it happen.
In Gardena one day at the end of school, the teacher, age 26, felt a hand scratching his back and turned around and see a 15 yr old Black girl back there with a most peculiar expression on her face. The teacher said nothing about it and went back to his business.
In Industry again, the 18 year old Hispanic Homecoming Queen was in love with the 32 year old teacher and everyone knew it. She had been giving him the eye for a while and he had been giving it back to her. They had had talked about a few things.
She got up from the back row and sashayed all the way up to the teacher, flirtatiously spoke to him for a bit, and wiggled her way back to her seat. The whole class ooooed and ahhhed and whoohooed. The Homecoming Queen wanted to fuck the teacher! Yay! Everyone was cheering. The teacher never did anything about it, and has been kicking himself ever since.
As you can see, female students are quite sexual and love to strut their stuff in front of an attractive male teacher in all sorts of ways. The teacher never took any of them up on their offers, but he did give it some thought.
This experience directly contradicts the notion parroted throughout our society by the male-hate propaganda of bigoted, chauvinist, maniacal feminists and their vaginized male allies that girls and young women are perennial victims and older males are perennial abusers.
It's quite clear that a lot of females aged 15-20 or so do "want it" with at least some males aged, say, 26-50. Now whether it's a good idea to pursue that or not depends mostly on the laws.
For a teacher, you need to wait until she graduates, even if she is 18. If you have sex with her before she has graduated and she is 18, you won't get arrested, but you can lose your job and you may also lose your teaching credential. It's considered unprofessional. If she's 18 and she has graduated from school, I assume you can date her. If you do this a lot though, you may make people at the school or in the community mad.
This post has been linked at the excellent Entitled to an Opinion blog.
Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
The truth is that female students, especially aged 17-18 and in particular Hispanics, loved to flirt with the teacher. The teacher loved it! He loved it when the teenage girls looked at him and flirted with him! They loved it too! Everyone was happy. Everyone but the feminists.
The girls would come up to the teacher and give him their phone number and tell him to call them. He would take the #'s home and think about them at night alone in his place and dream and have wild sexual fantasies about sex with 18-yr-old girls.
The teacher sat in the library one day in Compton. The seniors were Blacks and Samoans. By this age, Compton students are some of the best on Earth. No one will do any work at all, but all the bad ones are just gone. The only students there are warming a seat to graduate.
Both Blacks and Samoans, if they are in a good mood, are some of the funnest races to be around. They love life, love to laugh and joke, and take it easy. The 18-year-old Black girl kept staring at the teacher. "How old are you?" she asked. "Thirty-two", he said. "I've been looking for a boyfriend right around that age," she said, and that was that.
The teacher was 27 years old and 13-year-old girls still looked pretty great to him, just like Lolita. The teacher is now 50, and as he has advanced in age, 13-year-olds looked more and more like little girls with each passing year. But back at age 27, a 13-year-old girl was a delicious and wonderful object of fantasy.
The class in Harbor City was yelling at the teacher. The gorgeous 13-yr-old White girl in the back of the room wanted to have sex with the teacher! They were all yelling!
"Hey! She wants to have sex with you!" the students yelled. The teacher looked over at the beautiful and well-developed Lolita and she looked at him and nodded her head enthusiastically, while still looking embarrassed and shy.
The teacher got up out of his seat and risked his very job. He walked towards the girl. "Really?" he asked. "You really want to have sex with me?" She nodded her head enthusiastically with the same embarrassed look. The teacher laughed. "Where?" he asked. "Where are we going to do it?"
"The park! The park!" the kids all yelled. "She wants you to meet her in the park after school so she can have sex with you!" The teacher looked back at her and she was nodding her head once again. "Well, I don't know," he said, chuckling, and went back to his desk and started reading the cheap, tacky detective novel from the 1940's.
One day the teacher taught 10th grade in Lynwood. There were mostly Hispanic girls in the class. It was early in the morning. She girls were all about 15. The teacher was bored and so was the class.
Suddenly the teacher looked up. There was a sea of panties flashing him in class! Around 6-7 of the 15-year-old Hispanic girls had gotten together to conspire to flash the teacher. They had hiked up their skirts in a way that you could see their panties, and yes, they were all wearing panties. The teacher tried to ignore it, but he could not. He kept looking back.
Then the girls all started calling the teacher a pervert! The teacher thought this was most unfair, but the mind of a female is unfathomable in the best of times.
The teacher was teaching Hispanics again, assimilated ones this time, in La Puente. He was 32. In senior class, the girls kept coming up to the teacher over and over, 17 and 18-year-old Hispanic girls, and asking to have their work checked or have notes written for them.
Most of the reasons were completely phony and were just ruses to get next to the teacher. The girls would get right next to the teacher and violate his space totally and try to almost rub up against him with their phony requests. They especially loved to bend over and wave their tits nearly right in his face or up against his body. The teacher went along with it; he was having a blast! A great time was had by all!
The teacher was 29 years old and it was a White middle class school in Hacienda Heights. The class was freshmen - 14 year olds. The teacher walked down the aisle, and as moved by, the girls reached out and tried to grab his ass as he walked by, but they would always miss on purpose, and then giggle to their friends about it. After a while, the teacher figured it out, but he just let it happen.
In Gardena one day at the end of school, the teacher, age 26, felt a hand scratching his back and turned around and see a 15 yr old Black girl back there with a most peculiar expression on her face. The teacher said nothing about it and went back to his business.
In Industry again, the 18 year old Hispanic Homecoming Queen was in love with the 32 year old teacher and everyone knew it. She had been giving him the eye for a while and he had been giving it back to her. They had had talked about a few things.
She got up from the back row and sashayed all the way up to the teacher, flirtatiously spoke to him for a bit, and wiggled her way back to her seat. The whole class ooooed and ahhhed and whoohooed. The Homecoming Queen wanted to fuck the teacher! Yay! Everyone was cheering. The teacher never did anything about it, and has been kicking himself ever since.
As you can see, female students are quite sexual and love to strut their stuff in front of an attractive male teacher in all sorts of ways. The teacher never took any of them up on their offers, but he did give it some thought.
This experience directly contradicts the notion parroted throughout our society by the male-hate propaganda of bigoted, chauvinist, maniacal feminists and their vaginized male allies that girls and young women are perennial victims and older males are perennial abusers.
It's quite clear that a lot of females aged 15-20 or so do "want it" with at least some males aged, say, 26-50. Now whether it's a good idea to pursue that or not depends mostly on the laws.
For a teacher, you need to wait until she graduates, even if she is 18. If you have sex with her before she has graduated and she is 18, you won't get arrested, but you can lose your job and you may also lose your teaching credential. It's considered unprofessional. If she's 18 and she has graduated from school, I assume you can date her. If you do this a lot though, you may make people at the school or in the community mad.
This post has been linked at the excellent Entitled to an Opinion blog.
Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
