Cita con la Muerte: La Decapitación de Daniel Pearl

This is the Spanish translation of the Appointment With Death: The Beheading of Daniel Pearl post. It was translated by Fabian Aguilar, a 21 year old Colombian software developer from Bogota. Email him here.

If you are under 18, you may NOT watch this video! If you are a parent and are concerned about your kids viewing this post, please either supervise and/or restrict your children's Internet use or invest in a blocking program.

I am looking for translators to translate this post into Korean and Turkish. Email me if you are interested.

Italian version (traduzione in italiano). French translation (en en Français).

Note: By viewing this video, you hereby agree that you are doing so of your own free will.

Este es el video real de la decapitación de Daniel Pearl. Tiene como título La Masacre del Periodista Espía, el judío Daniel Pearl (descarga el video en este sitio) pero creo que el título está en Urdu al principio. Así que la mayoría no podrán leerlo.

Este video no es tan fuerte como tal vez crean. La decapitación en sí no es mostrada afortunadamente. Pero si vemos la cabeza luego de la masacre. Se cree que en este video, Pearl dice "Mi madre era judía. Yo soy judío" y justo luego Khalid Sheik Mohammad (KSM) se acerca por su espalda, saca un cuchillo y le rebana el cuello. Es nunca ocurre.

Lo que en verdad ocurre es que Pearl da un discurso pre-arreglado, listando algunas de las demandas de sus captores. También realiza algunos comentarios sobre su etnicidad judía y algunos datos más relacionados con su familia y su religión.

Mientras realiza todos estos comentarios, se muestran fotos intercaladas de las tropas israelitas arrestando palestinos, de cuerpos de palestinos, etc. Luego se muestra a Pearl en el suelo, ya muerto gracias a Dios, aparentemente con su garganta rebanada, mientras que un hombre desconocido, posiblemente KSM, arranca fácilmente la cabeza y la alza.

La cabeza degollada se mantiene alzada por el resto del video mientras que el grupo, el Movimiento Nacional por la Soberanía de Pakistan , lista un numero de demandas nacionalistas (el retorno de todos los prisionera pakistaníes de Guantánamo, la entrega del F-16 que Pakistán pagó a EEUU y jamás recibió y el fn de toda la presencia estadounidense en Pakistán).

Luego dicen, "Aseguramos a los americanos que jamás estarán seguros en la tierra musulmana de Pakistán." Continúan diciendo, "Y si nuestras demandas no son cumplidas, esta escena se repetirá una y otra vez..." Un buen recuento del video puede ser visto aquí.

La primera parte del video no es tan difícil de soportar. Pearl está extrañamente tranquilo y confiado mientras habla sobre Judaísmo, Sionismo y Judaísmo en Israel. Casi con orgullo.

Pero luego habla sobre lo horrible que es estar secuestrado - "La parte más difícil es no saber dónde estás o que va a sucederte" - luego recita lo que al parecer es propaganda anti-estadounidense sobre su política extrajera. Su voz se quiebra, luce nervioso, estresado y asustado. también se ve más demacrado.

Es como si los dos discursos hubieran sido filmados en espacios de tiempo distintos. En ese momento, sentí lástima por el tipo porque lucía muy asustado y yo sabía que iba a sucederle. Pero justo antes de que lo maten, cuando está hablando de cosas sobre el Judaísmo, es un hombre totalmente nuevo y habla tan claro y seguro que parece que fuera su graduación universitaria. Y esto es segundos antes de su fallecimiento.

Pearl fue un reportero para el Wall Street Journal, colaboraba con la investigación sobre los Servicios de Inteligencia Pakistaní (ISI) y sus posibles nexos con terrorismo musulmán en particular con Al Qaeda. Me parece increíble que un sujeto como este, andara por todo Pakistán, siendo judío, estadounidense y haciendo preguntas tan fácilmente.

El 23 de enero de 2002, se reunió con un miembro de Al-Qaeda, luego desapareció por un rato. El grupo anunció su secuestro, alegando que era un agente de la CIA (dudoso) e hixzo una lista de demandas. También publicaron una foto de Pearl con un arma apuntando a su cabeza, sosteniendo un periódico con la fecha en él.

Sheikh es un sujeto interesante. era al parecer un agente del MI-6 británico (la CIA de Inglaterra) desde 1994 y posiblemente hasta su arresto. También fue al parecer un agente ISI durante algún tiempo, al menos en 2001, y posiblemente hasta su arresto o incluso después. El presidente pakistaní Pervez Musharaff dice que era un agente doble.

Al parecer Sheikh jugó un papel importante en los ataques de Al-Qaeda del 11 de septiembre. Eso no ha sido profundamente investigado debido a la alianza pakistaní con EEUU.

Mi opinión personal es que el ISI, valiéndose de KSM y Sheikh secuestraron y asesinaron a Pearl por su investigación sobre los nexos entre II y Al-Qaeda. Debido a la presión de EEUU, se cansaron de Pearl y lo sentenciaron a muerte.

Creo que las acciones realizadas por Pearl, fueron bastante suicidas. No estoy defendiendo a estos bastardos de Al-Qaeda, sólo digo que no fue la cosa más astuta.

Desde entonces Pearl ha sido conmemorado, particularmente por la comunidad mundial judía. Bernard Henri-Levy un conocido e ilustre judío francés periodista ha escrito un libro sobre él.

En general, el mito creado alrededor de Pearl, es una especie de Alfred Dreyfus y ejemplifica el peligroso mundo en el que viven los judíos. Creo que lo implícito en esto es que los judíos deben mudarse a Israel y sentarse bajo una onda atómica para evitar ser decapitados por Al-Qaeda y estos tipos de organizaciones. Es algo tonto, pero es el típico pensamiento sionista judío.

Tristemente, Pearl fue asesinado en parte por ser judío, y sus verdugos eran claramente antisemitas, pero hay más. Apuesto que si hubiera un recolector de mariposas rondando en Pakistán jamás le hubiera pasado nada. Otros reporteros judíos han viajado a Pakistán y han entrevistado de forma abierta a jefes de Madrazas sin ningún problema de cualquier tipo.

Pearl estaba virtualmente en una misión suicida. Hasta el último momento estaba viviendo mu peligrosamente. La gente que elige hacer eso en nuestro mudo termina algunas veces lesionada o muerta. Sucede todo el tiempo. La historia de Daniel Pearl es triste, pero no tan exagerada como el mito que se ha tejido alrededor de este hombre.

Pearl fue un excelente estudiante, graduado de una universidad muy reconocida y fue un ilustre periodista, realizando algunos de los más grandes reportajes a finales de los ochenta y durante los noventa.

Él no fue una mala persona, y poseía muchos rasgos a seguir. Puede él descansar en paz.

Appointment with Death: The Beheading of Daniel Pearl

If you are under 18, you may NOT watch this video! If you are a parent and are concerned about your kids viewing this post, please either supervise and/or restrict your children's Internet use or invest in a blocking program.

I am looking for translators to translate this post into German, Turkish and Korean. Email me if you are interested.

Italian version (traduzione in italiano). French translation (en Français). Spanish version (en Español).

Note: By viewing this video, you hereby agree that you are doing so of your own free will.

This is the actual Daniel Pearl beheading video. It's titled The Slaughter of the Spy-Journalist, the Jew Daniel Pearl (download the video on this site here), but I think the title is in Urdu at the beginning, so most won't be able to read that.

This video is easier to take than you might think. The actual beheading is thankfully not shown, but we do see the severed head afterward. It is said that in this video, Pearl says, "My mother was a Jew. I am a Jew," and just then Khalid Sheik Mohammad (KSM) comes up behind him, pulls out a knife, and slits his throat. That never happens.

What really happens in this video is that Pearl gives a little pre-prepared speech listing some of the demands of his captors. Pearl also makes some impromptu remarks about his Jewish ethnicity, that of his family, his family's Jewish religion, the fact that his family are Zionists, and a town in Israel that is named after his great-grandfather, a famous Zionist.

While Pearl is making all these remarks about Israel, Zionism, Judaism, etc., there are interspersed photos of Israeli troops hassling and arresting Palestinians, of dead Palestinians, etc. Then it shows Pearl on the ground, already dead thank God, apparently with his throat slit, while an unknown man, possibly KSM, easily saws off the head and then holds it up.

The severed head stays up for the rest of the video while the group names itself - the National Movement for Pakistan Sovereignty, and lists a number of nationalist demands - the return of all Pakistani prisoners from Guantanamo, the release of all prisoners from Guantanamo, the release of F-16's that Pakistan bought from the US and never received, and an end to all US presence in Pakistan.

Then it says, "We assure Americans that they will never be safe on the Muslim land of Pakistan." This is followed by, "And if our demands are not met, this scene shall be repeated again and again and again..." A good play-by-play of the video is here.

The first part of the video is not that hard to take. Pearl is unusually composed and assured while he talks about Judaism, Zionism, Jewishness and Israel. It's almost as if he is proud.

But then he talks about how hard it is to be kidnapped - "The most difficult part is not knowing where you are or what is going to happen to you" - then he recites what is apparently a scripted propaganda anti-US screed about US foreign policy. His voice breaks, he seems nervous, stressed and frightened. He also looks a lot more haggard.

It's as if the two separate speeches were shot at different times. At that time, I felt sorry for the guy because he seemed so scared, and I knew what was going to happen to him. But right before he gets killed, when he's talking about the Jewish stuff, he's a whole new man, and he may as well be speaking at his college graduation. And this is seconds before his demise. Interesting.

Pearl was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal investigating, of all things, the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI - this is the Pakistani FBI-CIA combined) and their possible links with Muslim terrorism and in particular Al Qaeda. I can't believe this guy was running around Pakistan, a Jew and an American, openly asking questions like that.

On January 23, 2002, he made an appointment to meet some Al Qaeda guy, and then he went missing for a while. The group announced his kidnapping, said he was a CIA agent (dubious) and made a list of demands. They also released a photo of Pearl with a gun to his head holding up a newspaper with the date on it.

Pearl was killed on February 1, 2002 by beheading. On May 16, his body was found cut up in ten pieces in a shallow grave in Karachi. He was most probably murdered in Karachi. Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, a British Pakistani with a most interesting history, was eventually charged along with three others with the killing; Sheikh was sentenced to death. The death sentence has yet to be carried out.

Sheikh is a most interesting fellow. He was apparently an agent or asset with the British MI-6 (the British equivalent of the CIA), beginning in 1994, and possibly up until his arrest. He also appears to have been an ISI agent at some time, at least in 2001, and possibly until his arrest or even afterward. Pakistani President Pervez Musharaff says he was a double agent.

It seems that Sheikh, and apparently also elements of the ISI, played a key role in Al Qaeda's 9-11 attacks on the US. This has never been adequately followed up by the US due to the US-Pakistani alliance.

My personal opinion is that the ISI, using KSM and Sheikh, kidnapped and killed Pearl for looking into the ISI-Al Qaeda link. I think that then, under pressure from the US, they gave up Sheikh and sentenced him to death, but the sentence has not yet been carried out.

I think that for Daniel Pearl, a Jewish reporter, to go to Pakistan soon after 9-11 and the US invasion of Afghanistan and wander around Pakistan openly investigating ISI-Al Qaeda links to the point of meeting with Al Qaeda guys was pretty much suicidal. I'm not defending these scumbags who killed him. I'm just saying it wasn't a very smart thing for Pearl to do.

Pearl has since been lionized, in particular by the World Jewish community. Bernard Henri-Levy, a well-known French Jewish intellectual, dandy, attention-whore and journalist, has written a book about him.

The myth has been created that Pearl is some sort of a modern Alfred Dreyfus, and that his death exemplifies the murderous world that Jews live in, swarming with Islamo-Nazi types ready to finish Hitler's job as soon as they can get started. I guess the subtext is that all Jews have to move to Israel and sit under a 200-nuke umbrella to keep from getting beheaded by Al Qaeda types. This is silly, but it's typical Zionist Jewish thinking.

Sadly, Pearl was killed in part for being a Jew, and his killers were surely virulent anti-Semites, but there's more to it than that. I bet if he were a Jewish butterfly collector wandering around Pakistan netting butterflies, nothing would have ever happened to him. Other Jewish reporters have since gone to Pakistan and even openly interviewed heads of madrassas with no problems at all.

Pearl was on a virtual suicide mission. At the very least, he was living very, very dangerously. People who choose to do that in our world sometimes end up injured or even dead. Happens all the time. The Daniel Pearl story is sad, but there is less here than the popular myth that is developing around the man.

Pearl was an excellent student, graduated from a top university and was a superb journalist, breaking some of the biggest stories of the late 1980's and 1990's.

He was not a bad person, and he had many exemplary traits. May he rest in peace.

Rendez-vous avec la Mort: La Décapitation de Daniel Pearl

This is a French translation of the Appointment With Death: The Beheading of Daniel Pearl post, done by my super-translator "Natalie from France."

If you are under 18, you may NOT watch this video! If you are a parent and are concerned about your kids viewing this post, please either supervise and/or restrict your children's Internet use or invest in a blocking program.

I am looking for translators to translate this post into Korean and Turkish. Email me if you are interested.

Italian version (traduzione in italiano). Spanish version (en Español).

La vision de cette vidéo est destinée à un public adulte et averti, nous déclinons toute responsabilité pour d’éventuelles conséquences physiques ou psychiques. Interdit aux mineurs !!!

Je pourrais remplir ce Blog de toute sorte de vidéos-choc, même très rares. Je pourrais en avoir des avantages en termes de visibilité, mais ce n’est pas mon intention.

Je n’en ai présentés que quelques uns, très populaires comme la Dua Khalil, la pendaison de Saddam Hussein, la décapitation de "noirs" par des néonazis russes et cette vidéo. Comme à mon habitude, les vidéos sont suivies de mon commentaire et d’une analyse historique.

Ce film déjà diffusé sur le Net durant les années précédentes, s’intitule La Décapitation d’un Journaliste/Espion, le Juif Daniel Pearl (télécharger la vidéo sur ce site). Les titres du début sont en langue Urdu (presque inconnue pour la plupart des gens).

Contrairement à ce que disent certaines légendes métropolitaines, on nous épargne le moment de l’exécution. Nous ne voyons pas D.Pearl prononcer ses derniers mots "ma mère était juive, je suis un juif". Ensuite le bourreau Khalid Sheikh Mohammad (KSM) se rue sur lui et lui coupe la gorge.

En revanche on voit très bien les images suivantes qui nous montrent l’atroce massacre (la décapitation et l’exhibition de la tête tranchée) perpétré sur le cadavre par le bourreau KSM.

On a voulu donner à la vidéo une tournure journalistique, en soignant tout particulièrement la propagande et les détails politiques.

En effet durant la première partie Pearl énumère brièvement les questions auxquelles il devra répondre, il est évident que les mots lui ont été dictés.

Les phrases ont un ton méprisant : les mots de Pearl sont clairs quand il se défini juif, sa tradition religieuse et familiale, son sionisme accentué par le fait que l’un de ses aïeuls ait une rue à son nom dans une ville d’Israël etc. Pendant que Pearl parle des images de troupes israéliennes défilent, en action contre des palestiniens, morts.

Mais pour le peuple islamique un "mea culpa" ne suffit pas...il faut du sang...alors la scène change et le corps inanimé de Pearl, gorge tranchée, est séparé par un expert cagoulé (KSM), la tête est exhibée triomphalement.

Cette horrible image servira de décor pour la partie finale de la vidéo. En surimpression apparaît le sigle du NMFPS et l’habituelle liste de requêtes:

la libération de tous les prisonniers de Guantanamo (Pakistanais en premier), la livraison des bombardiers F-16 achetés, réglés par le Pakistan et jamais livrés par les Etats-Unis, et la fin de la présence militaire américaine au Pakistan.

Voici la menace finale : « américains…vous ne serez jamais à l’abris sur le sol sacré islamique pakistanais. Si vous ne vous pliez pas à nos exigences, cette scène se renouvellera encore, à tout jamais ! »

Ici une chronique détaillée de la vidéo.

De mon coté, il semble qu’au début Pearl soit digne et serein, je dirais même orgueilleux et fier de ses origines et de ses idées Sionistes.

Ensuite on voit la frayeur. La peur d’être un otage et de ne pas connaître son avenir proche. Quand il faut "réciter" la propagande anti-USA, sa voix se brise, il devient nerveux, apeuré ; son visage n’est plus le même : il est évident que la vidéo a été tournée en plusieurs fois.

Oui, à cet instant ça me faisait beaucoup de peine de le voir ainsi : c’était un homme apeuré et je savais déjà comment il allait finir. Puis un instant avant sa mort, le voici qui se transforme et commence à parler comme un étudiant d’université. Un autre homme, à quelques instants de la mort...intéressant...

Mais qui était Pearl ? Un reporter, un espion, ou bien les deux à la fois ? Officiellement il travaillait pour le WSJ et était en train de préparer un reportage sur les collusions possibles entre les services secrets pakistanais (ISI) et les cellules terroristes de Al Qaeda. Mais essayez d’imaginer un journaliste (Pearl) juif et américain, qui se promène au Pakistan pour poser ce type de question, cela ne vous semble pas être une situation invraisemblable ?

Le jour de sa disparition, le 23 janvier 2002, Pearl devait rencontrer un émissaire de Al Qaeda. Le groupe NMFPS a revendiqué son enlèvement en se vantant de l’aveu de Pearl qui admettait d’être un agent de la CIA. Ensuite le groupe a présenté ses requêtes. Comme preuve de la détention de Pearl ils ont envoyé aux agences de presse une photo du prisonnier : une mitraillette pointée sur la tête et un quotidien avec la date bien visible.

Le 1er février 2002, Pearl fut tué et décapité. Son corps fut retrouvé le 16 mai suivant, dans un cimetière de Karachi (le lieu probable de son exécution), découpé en dix morceaux...horrible !

Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh et 3 complices ont été incriminés pour ce meurtre barbare. Ahmed a été condamné à la peine capitale, mais la sentence n’a pas encore été exécutée. Il parait évident qu’il jouit d’une certaine protection.

Qui est Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh?

C’est un Anglo-pakistanais qui a un passé pour le moins douteux ou déconcertant.

Le bruit court qu’il était un agent ou un infiltré du MI-6 (une sorte de James Bond) depuis 1994, mais aussi un agent du ISI en 2001. En gros une personnalité tellement controversée que même le Président pakistanais Musharaff a dit de lui qu’il était un agent double !

Et oui, il semble que l’ISI soit bien impliqué dans l’attaque des tours jumelles, et que Sheik ait eu un rôle clef dans cet évènement.

Il est clair que l’alliance Etats-Unis/Pakistan n’a pas permis de mettre en évidence des connexions liées à une possible implication des services secrets pakistanais dans l’attaque du 11 septembre.

Voici mon hypothèse: l’ISI a fait taire Daniel Pearl qui était en train d’enquêter sur leurs connexions avec Al Qaeda. Les exécutants étaient KSM et Sheik.

Pour calmer leur opinion publique, les Etats unis ont exercé de fortes pressions sur le gouvernement pakistanais afin de trouver un coupable, et le voici tout trouvé! Pauvre Sheik, baisé, mais pas encore justicié. Il doit avoir sûrement un "parrain" politique (ou bien il doit avoir quelques documents secrets bien cachés).

Si Daniel Pearl était vraiment un brave reporter juif américain, et bien, il était candidat au suicide. Après le 11 septembre, aucune personne dotée de bon sens serait allée au Pakistan pour enquêter sur les services secrets pakistanais, sur leurs rapports avec Al Qaeda, et organiser une rencontre avec un terroriste musulman.

Officiellement Pearl avait même une famille ! Je ne suis pas en train de défendre les salauds qui l’ont tué, je dis que quelque chose ne tourne pas rond.

Depuis lors la communauté juive mondiale a créé le mythe du journaliste intrépide et légendaire. Bernard Henri-Levy, lui a dédié un livre.

L’image d’un nouveau Dreyfus, l’héroïque journaliste décapité seulement parce qu’il était juif, va à merveille à Daniel Pearl.

Les musulmans sont les nouveaux nazis, désireux de terminer l’oeuvre d’Hitler, et les Juifs continuent de vivre dans un monde hostile.

C’est clairement une vision paranoïaque, comme si tous les Juifs du monde devaient retourner en Israël, effrayés de mourir comme Pearl. Israël doit se défendre de l’attaque musulmane même avec la bombe atomique.

Il est vrai que Pearl a été tué par des fanatiques antisémites, mais il y avait aussi autre chose.

Pourquoi donc d’autres journalistes juifs ont pu faire tranquillement leur travail au Pakistan ? Il y a même des interviews et des reportages avec certains chefs de clan musulmans !!!

Si Pearl était un journaliste il ne pouvait pas ignorer qu’il allait vers une mort certaine. Le métier de journaliste prévoit ce risque, c’est déjà arrivé et ça arrivera encore. Je ne pense pas qu’il faut mythifier un homme qui a voulu hélas risquer sa vie de façon inconsidérée.

Daniel Pearl avait une grande valeur intellectuelle, un parcours universitaire de premier ordre, il était un journaliste doué, auteur de grands reportages à la fin des années 80 et durant les années 90. Un grand homme sûrement, qu’il repose en paix.

Appuntamento con la Morte: La Decapitazione di Daniel Pearl

If you are under 18, you may NOT watch this video! If you are a parent and are concerned about your kids viewing this post, please either supervise and/or restrict your children's Internet use or invest in a blocking program.

I am looking for translators to translate this post into Korean and Turkish. Email me if you are interested.

This is the Italian translation of the Appointment With Death: The Beheading of Daniel Pearl done by "Paolo From Trieste."

French translation here (en Français). Spanish version (en Español).

He added a lot of stuff relating to Italy such as the extremely strange Aldo Moro killing, supposedly done by the Red Brigades but probably done by the SISMI, the Italian intelligence service, and the CIA.

Nota: La visione è adatta solamente ad un pubblico maturo e decliniamo ogni responsabilità per eventuali conseguenze psico/fisiche. Ovviamente, tenete alla larga i minori!!!

Potrei riempire questo Blog di ogni sorta di video-shock, anche rarissimi. Ne trarrei vantaggio in termini di visibilità, ma non è questa la mia intenzione.

Ne ho presentati solo alcuni, molto popolari, come la...Dua Khalil, l'impiccagione di Saddam Hussein, la decapitazione di 'neri' effettuata dai neo-nazisti russi ed il presente video. Come da mia abitudine, i video sono accompagnati dal mio commento ed analisi storica.

Questo video, già diffuso in rete negli anni scorsi, è intitolato: la decapitazione di un giornalista/spia, l'ebreo Daniel Pearl (scarica il video in questo sito). I titoli di testa sono in lingua Urdu (praticamente sconosciuta alla massa).

Contrariamente alle 'leggende metropolitane' ci viene risparmiata la visione del momento dell'esecuzione. Non si vede D.Pearl pronunciare le sue ultime parole 'Mia madre era ebrea, io sono un ebreo' e poi il boia Khalid Sheikh Mohammad (KSM) avventarsi e tagliargli la gola.

Sono visibili invece le immagini successive che ci mostrano l'efferato scempio (la decapitazione e l'esibizione della testa mozza) fatto al cadavere dal boia KSM.

Al video è stato dato un taglio (e mi si perdoni la parola...) giornalistico, curando preminentemente il messaggio propagandistico ed i dettagli politici.

In effetti, nella prima parte Pearl elenca brevemente le domande alle quali dovrà rispondere, evidentemente 'sotto dettatura'.

Le frasi hanno un significato dispregiativo: sono chiare le parole di Pearl quando si definisce ebreo, la sua tradizione religiosa e famigliare, il suo Sionismo accentuato dal fatto che ad un suo avo sia stata intitolata una strada in una città d'Israele etc. Quando Pearl parla trascorrono le immagini di truppe israeliane in azioni contro i palestinesi, morti...

Ma per il popolo islamico non basta un 'mea culpa'...ci vuole il sangue...ed allora la scena cambia ed il corpo esanime di Pearl, la gola squarciata, viene decollato da un esperto incappucciato (KSM), la testa viene esibità trionfalmente.

Quest'orrenda immagine farà da sfondo alla parte finale del video. In sovraimpressione compare la sigla del NMFPS e l'abituale elenco di richieste..

Liberazione di tutti i prigionieri da Guantanamo (Pakistani in testa), la consegna dei bombardieri F-16 acquistati e pagati dal Pakistan e mai forniti dagli Usa (questa sì che è uno Scam...) e la fine della presenza militare Usa in Pakistan.

Ecco la minaccia finale: americani...non sarete mai al sicuro nel sacro suolo islamico del Pakistan, se non acconsentirete alle nostre richieste, questa scena si ripeterà ancora, ed ancora...per sempre!

Se volete una cronaca dettagliata del video.

Da parte mia, mi sembra che all'inizio Pearl sia composto e tranquillo, direi anche orgoglioso e fiero delle sue origini ed idee Sioniste.

Ma poi si vede la paura...la paura di essere in ostaggio e non conoscere il proprio futuro. Quando deve 'recitare' la propaganda anti-Usa, la sua voce si spezza, è nervoso, impaurito, il suo volto non è più lo stesso: è evidente che il video è stato girato in tempi differenti.

Sì, in quel istante mi faceva molta pena: era un uomo impaurito ed io sapevo già qual'era la sua fine, ma poi, un attimo prima della sua fine, ecco che si trasforma in un'altro uomo ed inizia a parlare come un laureando...un altro uomo ad alcuni secondi dalla morte...interessante.

Ma chi era Pearl? Reporter o Spia o forse entrambi? Ufficialmente lavorava per il WSJ e stava preparando un reportage sull'intreccio tra i servizi segreti Pakistani (ISI) e le cellule terroristiche di Al Qaeda in quel paese. Ma, provate ad immaginare un giornalista (Pearl) ebreo ed americano, andare in giro per il Pakistan a fare domande di quel tipo, beh, non vi sembra una situazione inverosimile?

Il giorno della sua scomparsa, il 23 gennaio 2002, Pearl doveva incontrare un emissario di Al Qaeda. Il gruppo NMFPS ha rivendicato il suo rapimento; millantando l'ammissione di Pearl di essere un agente CIA ha presentato le proprie richieste. Ad ulteriore conferma di avere in mano Pearl, è stata inviata alla stampa una foto del prigioniero: mitra puntato alla testa e quotidiano con la data in evidenza.

Il 1° febbraio 2002, Pearl è stato ucciso e decapitato. Il suo corpo è stato ritrovato il 16 maggio successivo (mmm che brutto giorno..vi ricordate Moro?) in un cimitero di Karachi (probabile luogo della sua uccisione). Smembrato in 10 pezzi..orribile!

Della sua barbara uccisione sono stati incrimanti Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh...ed altre 3 complici. Ahmed è stato condannato a morte ma la sentenza non è stata ancora eseguita. E' qualcuno che gode di una certa protezione, evidentemente

CHI E' AHMED OMAR SAEED SHEIKH?

E' un Anglo/Pakistano da un passato a dir poco equivoco o sconcertante.

Si vocifera che fosse un agente o un infiltrato del MI-6 (tipo James Bond, per intenderci) dal 1994, ma anche un agente dell'ISI nel 2001. Insomma una personalità talmente discussa che perfino il Presidente Pakistano Musharaff ha detto la sua: era un agente che faceva il doppio gioco!

Già, sembra che nell'attacco alle Torri Gemelle l'Isi fosse ben coinvolto e che Sheik ha avuto un ruolo chiave in tutta la vicenda.

Ovviamente l'allenza Usa-Pakistan non ha permesso il diffondersi di voci relative ad un possibile coinvolgimento dei servizi segreti Pakistani all'attacco dell' 11 settembre.

La mia ipotesi è questa: l'ISI ha messo a tacere Daniel Pearl che stava indagando sul loro collegamento con Al Qaeda. Gli esecutori del piano erano KSM e Sheik.

Gli USA, per calmare l'opinione pubblica interna, hanno fatto formidabili pressioni sul Governo Pakistano per avere un colpevole, et voilà, trovato il colpevole! Povero Sheik...fottuto, ma non ancora giustiziato. Sicuramente deve avere qualche 'Padrino' Politico (oppure ha qualche documento top-secret ben nascosto...).

Se Daniel Pearl era solo un bravo reporter americano di origine ebrea, beh, scusatemi, era un candidato al suicidio! Dopo l'11 settembre, nessuna persona di buon senso sarebbe andata in un posto come il Pakistan, indagare sui servizi segreti Pakistani, indagare sui loro rapporti con Al Qaeda, organizzare un incontro con un terrorista mussulmano...

Ufficialmente Pearl aveva anche una famiglia!! Ecchecazzo! (ndt: scusate, la parolaccia è mia). Badate bene, non difendo i merdosi bastardi che lo hanno ucciso, dico solo che qualcosa non quadra!!

Da allora la comunità ebraica mondiale ha creato il mito dell'impavido, leggendario giornalista. Bernard Henri-Levy, noto giornalista ed intellettuale ebreo francese (ed anche odiosamente malato di protagonismo) gli ha dedicato un libro.

L'immagine del novello Dreyfus, l'eroico giornalista decapitato solo perchè ebreo, calza a pennello per Daniel Pearl.

I nuovi nazisti sono i mussulmani, desiderosi di finire l'opera di Hitler, e gli ebrei continuano a vivere in un mondo ostile.

E' una chiara visione paranoica, è come se tutti gli Ebrei del mondo dovessero tornare in Israele, impauriti di fare la stessa fine di Pearl. Israele deve difendersi anche con le bombe atomiche dall'attacco mussulmano.

No, a parte tutto, è vero che Pearl è stato ucciso da fanatici antisemiti, ma è anche vero che sotto c'era dell'altro.

Perchè altri giornalisti ebrei, nello stesso periodo, hanno potuto fare tranquillamente il loro lavoro in Pakistan? Ci sono addirittura interviste e reportage con alcuni capi tribù mussulmani!!

Se Pearl era un giornalista, non poteva non sapere che andava incontro a morte quasi sicura. Il mestiere del giornalista prevede anche questo rischio, è successo e succederà sempre. Non penso che si debba mitizzare un uomo per aver voluto e purtroppo, lo ripeto ancora una volta, purtroppo rischiare la propria vita in un modo così sconsiderato.

Daniel Pearl aveva un forte spessore intellettuale, un background Universitario di prim'ordine, un fine giornalista, autore di grandi reportage alla fine degli anni '80 e nei primi anni '90. Un grande uomo sicuramente, ma non un mito costruito a tavolino. Non gli rende onore. Shalom, riposa in pace, Daniel.

The Mystification of Anti-Semitism

Updated November 19:

Commenter Lafayette Sennacherib notes that when he commented on a blog recently, laying out the various complaints that Nazis had against Jews (that the Jewish elite were aligned with international capital, while the rest contained a hotbed of seething Communism) his comment was deleted as anti-Semitic.

Let us protest this sort of thing.

What the Nazis did was really evil and fucked up, but they did have their reasons!

The Jewish line is that all anti-Semitism is "mysterious." This is what I call "the mystification of anti-Semitism." Many Jewish writings on anti-Semitism take this line, to the point where this is now our dominant "analysis" of anti-Semitism.

The Jewish line goes something like this: Anti-Semitism is crazy! It cannot be explained by any rational mechanism. There simply is no rational reason for it whatsoever. Basically, it's a form of insanity.

This analysis has the advantage for sure of letting the Jews of the hook and putting it all on the anti-Semites, but sadly enough, in life, things do have reasons. Even victimizers victimize people for various reasons.

This is of course not to defend victimizers or engage in blame the victim crap, but this analysis is useful in life.

Now suppose in life I am getting victimized a lot. I move around to different towns, and I keep on getting victimized, often for the exact same false "reasons." My victimizers are a bunch of pricks for sure, but it's incumbent on me as a rational actor to discover what it is that I am doing that is setting these idiots off (unfortunately, this been the case at various times in my life).

A proper analysis, with the assistance of a psychotherapist, helped me to understand what was driving some of the idiots who did some really fucked-up stuff to me at various times in my life. Turns out that they were not psychotic nuts, but were operating from some logical, but sick, psychological impulses. I now try to live my life so as not to provide fuel for bullies.

I feel this Jewish-led project to mystify anti-Semitism has not been helpful in terms of getting to the bottom of the phenomenon. As anti-Semitism does a lot of harm to Jews, it is important to get to the bottom of it.

Further, if there are any reasonable complaints against Jews that further anti-Semitism, it is helpful to discover these so that Jews may modify their behavior in the future in order to lessen anti-Semitic bile directed at them.

One of the projects of this blog is an empirical analysis of anti-Semitism.

That is, we will take all of the arguments, from the Philosemites to the anti-Semites, as "possibly true" and then analyze them to see if there is anything there or not. I'm not prepared to just reject all anti-Semitic accusations as nonsense, but they do need to prove their case. Likewise with the Jews and their defenders! May the best theory win.

Musings on Dual Loyalty, Judaism as Zionism, and Anti-Semitism

The latest death toll figures from Hurricane Katrina can be seen on this website here. The famous Russian neo-Nazi video is on this blog here.

Updated December 6:

Always-perceptive commenter James Schipper makes some astute, terse and cut to the chase comments on my post, The "New Anti-Semitism". In it, he moves beyond the typically vulgar anti-Semitism that much modern anti-Zionism descends into and offers a perfectly logical explanation for the dual loyalty accusation leveled at Jews.

He also brings up some very difficult questions about the differences between Judaism and Zionism and whether there is really any difference at all.

Schipper:

If criticism of Israel = anti-Zionism = anti-Semitism, then we should be proud to call ourselves anti-Semites.

What is really wrong with Israel? It is not such a bad country for Jews, or even for the Arabs in Israel proper. I would rather be a Jew in Israel than an Arab in any Arab country. Israel was born in sin, but so was every country in the Western hemisphere. Israel is oppressive in the occupied territories, but by historical standards, this oppression is hardly unique.

The real reason for opposing Israel is that it does not see itself as the country of its citizens but as the country of all the Jews in the world. According to Israel, Jews in other countries are living in exile, are really Israelis and should be loyal to Israel.

In other words, Israel expects the Jewish citizens of other countries to behave like Israel's fifth-columnists, and that is exactly what Zionists outside Israel are.

No political party outside Israel should accept Zionists as members, and no government outside Israel should appoint Zionists to a senior government job. Instead, Zionist should be encouraged to put their bodies where their loyalties are: in Israel.

Suppose that Italy saw itself as the country of all Catholics in the world and expected Catholics everywhere to defend Italian interests, then it would be behaving exactly as Israel does. That would also be a good reason for non-Catholics in other countries to look at Catholics with suspicion and to regard Italy with hostility.

The late Arthur Koestler wrote in an essay that after 1948 all Jews should choose one of two options: go to Israel or abandon Judaism altogether. He is right insofar as Judaism implies Zionism.

Judaism has always posited that Jews are a people and that Israel is their promised land, which is also the position of Zionism. If Judaism implies Zionism, then Jews outside of Israel, it they want to remain Jewish, should emigrate to Israel or else detribalize and deterritorialize Judaism, which may be denaturing it.

Theological question: Why does Obama allow bad things to happen and evil people to prosper?

More seriously, why did Obama appoint a hard Zionist as his chief of staff? It is not a good sign.

I agree with several things in this post.

First of all, he attacks some of the usual broadsides leveled at Israel and dismisses them.

What I find disturbing, and many Zionists have noted this, is the particular vehemence many Israel-critics level at Israel's oppression of Jews inside Israel, while they are silent or even supportive of even worse oppression by states against minorities outside Israel.

White nationalists think it's awesome for Whites to treat non-Whites like shit, except when it comes to White Jews versus "muds" in Israel. Kurds in the Arab World are treated awfully bad, Berbers less so but still poorly, and the Shia are oppressed all over the Arab World. There is open oppression and violence against Christians in Egypt and Iraq.

Bahais are treated horribly in Iran, Sunnis less so but still poorly, and the Ahwaz have some good beefs. Turks treat Kurds horribly in Turkey. Russia has massacred 20% of the population of Chechnya in what can only be termed a genocide. China's treatment of the Uighurs and Tibetans is disgraceful. Treatment of Hindus in Pakistan is shameful, and NE Indian Asians are treated poorly by the Indian state.

Japan treats its Koreans, Burakumin and Ainu pretty badly. The Hmong are still treated like shit in Laos and the Montagnards are not done well by Vietnam. Pygmies are openly genocided and cannibalized as a matter of custom in Zaire, and the Khoisan are nearly murdered at will in SW Africa.

There is a real genocide of Arabs against Africans in Darfur, and another one, Arabs versus Christians, has just ended in South Sudan. Africans are routinely enslaved by Arabs in the Sahel.

We could go and on but you get the picture. What is disturbing about all of this is that most Israel-critics are either indifferent to, ignorant of or even supportive of, the maltreatment of minorities above. Zionists are correct that this is either ignorance or anti-Semitism.

All, or most all, modern nations were born in sin.

This was due to the nature of the modern nation-building exercise, which typically involved ethnic cleansing or some sort of mass killing or genocide of any existing indigenous people, sidelining, subjection, forced assimilation (cultural genocide) or outright genocide against anyone not part of the dominant nation of the nation-state, and forced destruction of all languages but the one chosen by the nation-state or that is the dominant nation.

The Modern Left in the West, which has adopted Third-Worldism , minority-hugging and European hatred with gusto, errs in singling out Europeans for particular abuse in terms of nation-building. It's been bloody and awful everywhere and at all times.

Schipper also points out that although Israel is oppressive in the Occupied Territories, by comparative standards, they are relatively mild. Considering the outrageous provocations and attacks of the Palestinians, I am amazed that Israel has gone as easy on them as it has.

Arabs do not believe in fighting wars in a civilized manner and the Geneva Conventions are regarded by them as Western comedy. Any Arab state faced with Palestinian-type provocations by non-Arabs would have been vastly worse than Israel.

Truthfully, just about every nation fighting an insurgency has been more horrible that Israel on orders of magnitude.

Consider this: according to counterinsurgency doctrine, enshrined by the US military and state and promoted by the US media and both US political parties, any civilian who "supports" an insurgency needs to be arrested, beaten, tortured and killed. All counterinsurgencies supported by the US have routinely massacred, mutilated and tortured to death insurgency "supporters".

This has been true in every counterinsurgency in Latin America, in Indonesia in 1965, in the US counterinsurgencies in SE Asia during the Vietnam War, in the counterinsurgencies in Mozambique, Algeria and Angola, in Russia's counterinsurgency in Chechnya, in India's counterinsurgencies in India proper and Kashmir, in Sri Lanka against the Tamils, in Indonesia against the Acehese and East Timorese, in the Philippines against the NPA, and in Nepal's recent Civil War.

In these counterinsurgencies, hundreds of thousands of "supporters" of insurgencies were murdered, tortured and mutilated, while the US cheered, poured in money and looked the other way.

In contrast, almost 100% of Palestinians seem to support the Palestinian insurgency. Clearly, Israel has not been going around killing "supporters" of the insurgency. If they did, they would have killed tens of thousands of Palestinians so far.

Considering the provocations of the Palestinians, Israel has fought one of the cleanest counterinsurgencies in modern times.

Zionists are correct that these criticisms of Israel, combined with support for to indifference to much worse behaviors by non-Jews, are evidence of either ignorance or anti-Semitism.

But Schipper does hit it on the head.

The reason to oppose Israel is that it is not a state of its citizens. Israel openly says that it is the state of all Jews on Earth, not of its citizens. Hence, it is perfectly reasonable for non-Jews in every nation on Earth containing Jews to look upon their Jews as possible traitors and dual-loyalists. Dual loyalty, rather than being an "anti-Semitic canard" as many Jews shrilly screech, is actually grounded in immaculate reason.

Schipper also suggests that the wall between Judaism and Zionism may be little more than a wall of sand, and one that has been hit by so many waves that there's almost nothing left.

Although anti-Zionist Jews offer various reasons for their non-support of Israel, the fact remains that Judaism has always said that Israel is the land of the Jews. Assuming the Messiah returns tomorrow, even Naturei Karta is willing to head to Israel and become fervent Zionists.

Hence the uncomfortable notion, typically parroted by ferocious anti-Zionists and some vulgar anti-Semites, that it is not just Zionism that is the problem, but Judaism itself, is lent some troubling weight. I don't want to go near this thesis because to be honest, I'm a pussy when it comes to the Jewish Question.

Schipper finally suggests that the Jews of the world either renounce Judaism or practice what you preach and head to Israel. Once again, troubling stuff.

There's nary a trace of anti-Semitism in Schipper's comments, but the issues he raises are toxic as Hell.

Just some thought-meals.

Enjoy.

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.

The "New Antisemitism"

The latest death toll figures from Hurricane Katrina can be seen on this website here. The famous Russian neo-Nazi video is on this blog here.

Updated November 11:

I'll proudly don this label, though I admit that some (or many) practitioners of this new form of "the oldest hatred" (sic) are taking it way too far into what I call "vulgar anti-Semitism".

As a basic philosophical position, this blog will take the logical Left position of embracing a reasonable form of "new antisemitism" while in general taking a principled Left line (at the very least following Paul de Man's wartime essays and Jacques Derrida's interpretation of his writing)* in opposing vulgar anti-Semitism as an example of backwardness, stupidity, lazy thinking, racism and in general, just reactionary bullshit.

Confused?

Good.

Deal with it, anti-Semites and Jewish nationalists.

*The link is to some deconstructionist stuff starring Derrida, Paul De Man and some others, and the subject is as abstruse as most of that stuff is. For this who don't feel like wading through the post-structuralist mud, I will try to sum it up:

During WW2, in 1942, Paul De Man wrote some anti-Semitic articles for the Vichy Nazi press in France. De Man later went on to become one of the big deconstructionist guys. So it came out that he had written this Vichy Nazi stuff, and it was a big scandal.

Derrida "deconstructed" his work and noted that in his work, De Man had argued against "vulgar anti-Semitism", which is more of an "I know it when I see it" thing than something well-defined.

Nevertheless, his article would still be seen as anti-Semitic by any reasonable reader. So Derrida, in deconstructing De Man, wrote that since all anti-Semitism was vulgar necessarily, De Man, in condemning vulgar anti-Semitism and not mentioning any other kind, was actually condemning all anti-Semitism. This set off a spate of articles back and forth in deconstructionist circles.

References

Goldberg, David Theo. 1993. Racist Culture: Philosophy and the Politics of Meaning, pp. 229-230. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Patai, Daphne, Corral, Wilfrido Howard. 2005. Theory's Empire: An Anthology of Dissent. Spitzer, Alan B., Chapter 17, The Debate Over the Wartime Writings of Paul De Man. The Language of Setting the Record Straight. New York: Columbia University Press

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.

Successes of the Omnipotent US Jews

The latest death toll figures from Hurricane Katrina can be seen on this website here. The famous Russian neo-Nazi video is on this blog here.

Anti-Semites say that Jews control everything in the West. Well, at least they control the media and the government. Neither is really true. Newsweek and the Washington Post are not run by Jews, nor is the LA Times. Rupert Murdoch is not a Jew.

There are 13 Jews in the US Senate, I believe. 13%. How does that equate to control over the US Congress? It doesn't.

Jews don't control Capitol Hill in the US. The ADL has not been able to implement most of its agenda - hate speech laws, amnesty for 12 million illegal aliens, etc. Congress keep trying to give amnesty to the illegals (ADL supports this) and it keeps getting shot down. The ADL keeps demanding hate speech laws, and the (Jewish-controlled?) Congress keeps shooting it down.

Jews in the US, including media Jews, are mostly liberal; they're the most liberal ethnic group in the US. How has this liberal agenda been implemented by media Jews and government Jews in the last three decades? It's hasn't been. The very liberal US Jewish community is so powerful that their liberal agenda has been getting crushed for three decades now.

Wow, that's some real ferocious power, man.

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.

Schipper On Jews, Modernism and the Left

The latest death toll figures from Hurricane Katrina can be seen on this website here. The famous Russian neo-Nazi video is on this blog here.

Updated December 6:

Astute commenter James Schipper comments on the Statement on Jews and Antisemitism post:

Another intellectual flaw of anti-Semites is overgeneralization. Jews live in dozens of different countries and Judaism varies from superorthodoxy to reformism, but they see all Jews as the same. That's only possible if Jews are seen as a race and if their race explains their behavior.

I don't think that Jews created modernity. It is the other way around: modernity created the post-ghetto Jew. Starting with revolutionary France, Jews in Europe were emancipated, that is, their separate legal status was abolished and they became ordinary citizens.

Since they still were outsiders to some extent, most of them were attracted to leftism, which, being the ideology of change, obviously would be preferred by outsiders. Conservativism is the ideology of those who are well-integrated in and happy with the status quo.

The fact that Jews are overrepresented among leftists has nothing to do with Judaism but everything with their minority status and their historical situation as often persecuted outsiders. We need sociological, not theological or biological explanations for Jewish behavior.

Biology explains only Jewish over-representation in intellectually demanding professions because there is every reason to assume that Jews have on average more innate intelligence than Gentiles.

My view is that Jews in Palestine were not smarter than the people around them, but that it was the smartest ones that in Roman times were expelled from or left Palestine in disproportionate numbers. Those that stayed behind were eventually assimilated.

Surely there is nothing in the genes of the Jew that creates "the Jew". When you delve into anti-Semitism, pretty soon, you find that most rightwing White racialist anti-Semites believe that the evils of the Jew are located in the genes. I consider this to be nonsense, but we shall await the findings of modern genetics. I doubt if anything will turn up.

Hyperethnocentrism along with tendencies towards insularism, clannishness, xenophobia, paranoia and and even racism tend to occur across all types of Jews. I feel this is due to culture. As evidence, I note that many converts to Judaism quickly develop all of these characteristics, often in spades. That seems to seal the case for cultural Jewishness right there.

Schipper neatly sums up why the Jews have been attracted to the Left. In all this time, I have never heard anyone say it quite so succinctly. Outsiders are attracted to the Left, so Blacks and Hispanics in the US vote Democratic. Those satisfied with the status quo are conservative, hence Whites in the US are conservative.

Schipper's analysis also probably explains the new emergence of a considerable movement in the US of conservative Jews. Antisemitism in the US has been reduced to a shadow of itself, and Jews are more successful than any other ethnic group.

When they were still getting barred from country clubs, and when signs said, "No Jews or dogs allowed," Jews had a great reason to vote liberal, whatever their economic fortunes. Now that they've got life dicked here in the US, a number of them are well-integrated in and happy with the status quo and the phenomenon of the rightwing Jew has appeared.

I doubt if the Jews who left Palestine were any smarter than the ones who stayed, but I don't have a lot of proof.

I suspect that Talmudic culture, which developed in Europe after 900 with the solidification of the Babylonian Talmud, with its emphasis on learning (Jewish men who could not learn the Talmud left the ghetto and converted to Christianity), along with the smartest Jewish men being seen as the best marriage partners for Jewish women, had a lot to do with selection for intelligence and high Ashkenazi IQ, though I realize that this ought to also predict high IQ in Mizrachi Jews, and their IQ is not notably high.

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.

Statement on the Jews and Antisemitism

The latest death toll figures from Hurricane Katrina can be seen on this website here. The famous Russian neo-Nazi video is on this blog here.

This site, of course, has been accused many times of anti-Semitism by the usual suspects for the usual reasons.

Nevertheless, some of my friends have recently noted that "I'm going easy on the Jews," or worse, I've become pro-Jewish. Others have noted that I don't talk about the Palestinians much on here anymore.

Truth is, I'm bored with the Palestinians, I'm bored with Israel, and I'm bored with the Middle East. Plus, every time I mention that stuff, it spurs the antisemites in the comments section (who are allowed to post here, by the way) to make a ton of antisemitic posts, and after a while it brings in all these weird, combative, Zionist Jews who accuse me of antisemitism and try to start fights.

There is supposedly a type of antisemitism called Anti-Zionist antisemitism. I guess I will gladly plead guilty to that.

Other than that, to be honest, the Jews bore me. I've been reading up on Jews and Judaism and Israel for years now, and I'm all Jewed out. They bore me to tears, and it seems I've learned all I ever wanted to learn about them.

There was a while there when I was on an antisemitic kick, but I started getting a lot of flack for it, and then I pulled back and started to examine it, and there was not much there.

Antisemitism is one of many simplistic theories that tries to explain all, most or many of the problems of the world by pointing a single actor, force or mechanism. As such, I feel it is foolish, since all such ideologies are foolish. Including die-hard Marxists who boil everything down to economics.

There is no one answer. There is no one problem. If only life were that simple. Life is so much more complex, and problems are as difficult to pin down as solutions are to fashion, that it makes sense that people would take the intellectually lazy way out.

In terms of "Left antisemitism", antisemitism really is the socialism of fools! I used to hate it when Leftists said that, but now I'm convinced. Jewish capitalists are just capitalists, and if anything, they tend to be more progressive-minded than the ordinary type.

Further, antisemitism seems to lead inexorably to conservatism, racism, White Supremacism, fascism, social Darwinism, capitalism - feudalism - royalism, the worst kinds of nationalism and traditionalism, anti-Communism, anti-liberalism, anti-feminism, anti-integration, and really, an opposition to the whole modernizing project of the Left.

Antisemitism is really an assault on modernity itself, as Jews are seen by antisemites as the "virus" that carries modernity in all of its scary self. And it's true - they do! Going forwards is scary, and a lot of cowards would rather go backwards. So they blame the Jews for helping to drive us forwards. I don't want to be a part of any regressive project.

Yes, there are rightwing Jews. There are rightwingers of every race and tribe. Next?

The Jews are the most progressive group in America, and possibly in the world. We on the Left owe a tremendous debt to them as they helped to birth and foster our project.

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.

Help Fight Anti-Semitism!

Click to enlarge the cartoon and read the text easier.

The latest death toll figures from Hurricane Katrina can be seen on this website here. The famous Russian neo-Nazi video is on this blog here.

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.

Question For the Anti-Semites

The latest death toll figures from Hurricane Katrina can be seen on this website here. The famous Russian neo-Nazi video is on this blog here.

Why is it when White folks get into the Anti-Semitism Thingie, it seems like sooner or later (if they did not feel this way already) they get into the White Nationalism Thingie or the We Hate Niggers* and Beaners* Thingie? Please clue us in. Inquiring minds want to know.

I'm well aware that there are White folks who are White nationalists but are not anti-Semites. Just that with White folks, there's not too many the other way around. No wonder Jews are suspicious of this WN shit. Tends to come with some pretty nasty strings attached. They ain't stupid.

Even Leftist anti-Semites, after a while, get into the Holocaust Revisionism Thingie, and most of them get into the Nationalism Thingie and the really weird and creepy Let's Get Rid of Left and Right Thingie. That's assuming they are not already making alliance with neo-Nazis and chanting Save Zundel!

Man, anti-Semitism does some weird shit to your head. It's like it's almost worse for your brain than meth.

*Used sardonically

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.

Birds of a Feather: Anti-Semites and Super-Jews

I got the strangest reaction as I read this article on an extremely weird and crazy website. It was mingled in with a bunch of semi-anti-Semitic conspiratorial more-or-less bullshit, and I read bits and pieces of this article, assuming it was part of the whacked out anti-Semitic crap.

After a few minutes, I figured out that instead of being written by an anti-Semitic nutcase, it was actually written by an ultra-pro-Semitic frothing-at-the-mouth Zionazi Jew crazy from Israel.

So the craziest of the Jews actually sound like anti-Semitic kook Nazis when they talk.

Is that weird, or is that does make sense in some version of the universe?

Is that anti-Semites say that Jews are evil, crazy, bigoted and dangerous as Hell, and super-Jews do their best to play the role?


ISRAEL NATIONAL NEWS.COM
03/26/03, 3:19 AM
This War is for Us

by Ariel Natan Pasko

Of course this war against Iraq and Saddam Hussein is for us. ... - i.e., the Jews and Israel. Chazal - our sages - throughout the ages have explained the Torah, telling us that everything that happens in the world is for the benefit of the Jewish People.

Simply put another way, if all the world is a stage, then the Jews - and especially those in the Land of Israel - are the lead actors on the stage of history, and the goyim - the nations, i.e. the gentiles - have supporting roles, while the evil-doers are props and background scenery.

As our tradition states, G-D - the great playwright - created the world for the sake of the Jewish People, and it is our responsibility to implement the Torah ... in it.

Stop and think for a moment: the last Gulf War in 1991 ended erev - just before - Purim. This Gulf War began motzei - just after - Shushan Purim. Get the picture? In between, "The Jews had light, and gladness, and joy, and honor." (Book of Esther 8:16)

Read the Purim story in Megilat Esther again, it is a rags to riches story on a national scale. Haman, the prototypical anti-Semite, plans mass murder of the Jews and in the end pays with his life, the life of his ten sons - all hanged - and the Jews kill 75,800 members of the anti-Semitic - i.e. Nazi - party of the time.

This is not so different from the Nuremberg Trials after World War II, when 23 Nazi war criminals were tried. Originally 11 were to have the death penalty imposed if found guilty. Everybody in those days thought that they would be shot - as is customary in military executions - or get the electric chair - as was common in the United States.

But when the judges announced the verdict of guilty, they also said that hanging would be the method of execution. Two hours before the execution, they found Hermann Goering dead in his cell. He had committed suicide. That left only 10 Nazis to execute.

There is more to this story than meets the eye. In Megilat Esther (9:7-9), when it describes the execution of Haman's ten sons, their names are listed in a vertical column. If you look at the Hebrew closely, you'll notice extra-small letters in three of the names. The first name, Parshandata, has a small tav.

The seventh name, Parmashta, has a small shin. The tenth name, Vayzata, has a small zayn. Hebrew letters are also used as numbers, as well as for dates in the Jewish calendar. Tav, shin, zayn numerically means 707, corresponding to the year 5707, which began with Rosh HaShanah - the Jewish New Year - on September 25, 1946.

On October 16, 1946, as foreshadowed in the names of Haman's ten sons, ten Nazi leaders were hanged as war criminals. And if that doesn't impress you, out of nowhere, with the rope around his neck, Julius Streicher - editor of Der Sturmer, the Nazi propaganda newspaper - shouted out with flaming hatred in his eyes, just as the trap door opened, "Purimfest 1946!" It was reported in the international press of the day.

As I said earlier, of course this war is for the Jews and Israel, and instead of hiding from the accusation, ... we should gratefully acknowledge what the Master of the Universe is doing to our enemies for us. Saddam Hussein, Yasser Arafat, Bashar Assad, Osama Bin Laden, and the other dictators, terrorists and mullahs of the region, are the modern day Hamans and Hitlers.

Great things are yet to come...

Goodbye and Good Riddance

Updated August 23:

A traitor is dead. Goodbye and good riddance.

A notorious serial liar, fascist, Nazi sympathizer and novelist has died. He was lionized in the West for his lying novels and his lies where he claimed that 60 million, or 110 million, or however many, humans were murdered in his country. In reality, the state did kill some people in his country, but the number of those killed in peacetime was 1.6 million, not 60-110 million as he lied, I mean wrote.

Furthermore, the death rate was three times higher under the Czarist regime he so loved and championed his whole life than under the revolutionaries who replaced them.

He supported fascism his whole life, championing the Spanish Francoist Falangist fascists in Spain in the Spanish Civil War and later all through their rule. In 1975, as anti-fascist and pro-democracy demonstrations rocked Spain, the novelist traveled to Spain to shill for Spanish fascism.

Truth is, he never met a fascist he did not like.

He opposed the democratic revolution that overthrew the Portuguese fascist Salazar dictatorship in 1974, and advocated that the US military invade Portugal to restore the fascists to power. After the North Vietnamese conquered South Vietnam and reunited the country in 1975, he urged the US to attack Vietnam again. He opposed the liberation from colonialism of Portugal's colonies.

He gave speeches saying that North Vietnam was hiding tens of thousands of US servicemen as slave labor prisoners. These lies served as the basis for the crazy POW-MIA movement and the Rambo movies. Any American journalist arguing for peace between the USSR and the US was condemned as a traitor in the novelist's speeches.

He also lied about the military prowess of the USSR and urged a massive US buildup to counteract it. He said that the Soviets had a 5-7 times advantage in conventional weapons and nuclear weapons that were 2-5 times more powerful than those of the US. After the fall of the USSR, the novelist advocated a return to Czarism under the wing of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Most such people in his country were hardcore anti-Semites, and he was apparently no exception. He blamed Jews for the supposed deaths of 110 million people in his land and wrote an anti-Semitic book called Two Hundred Years Together on the history of his people and the Jews of his land. Due to Jewish pressure, that book has not yet been published in English in the US, but if you're lucky you can get it in Russian.

After World War 2, he came back to his native land, the USSR, and wrote polemics. These polemics resulted in his conviction as a counterrevolutionary for distributing anti-Soviet propaganda. His writings said that the war with Nazi Germany could have been avoided if the USSR had reached a compromise with the Germans.

He also said that the USSR and Stalin were worse than Nazi Germany and Hitler due to the sufferings of the Soviet people during the war. His detractors accused him of being a Nazi sympathizer. In 1946, for those writings, he was tried, convicted and sent to a labor camp for the crime of treason.

Now he's dead, but at least he can't write anymore lies.

I would like to post another side to his infamous archipelago. His gulags were obviously not a paradise, and 300,000 political prisoners, not 60-110 million, did indeed die there. 50% died during World War 2, mostly due to medicine shortages that were effecting the entire land at this time.

For instance, during the late 1940's in the USSR, some people were unemployed and wanted a job. They could not get one, so some of them would try to get arrested. They would walk up to the (evil, murderous Jewish NKVD that killed millions in an instant and for no reason) and asked to be arrested.

The NKVD, at that time being mostly fairly principled folks who would not arrest people just because they walk up to them and demand to get arrested, would not arrest them, and informed them that they would not arrest them unless they had committed a crime. The people who wanted to get arrested said they just wanted to work, so they were sent to work in the gulag in the Far East.

They were undoubtedly sent to one of the highest level gulags, which were really no more than huge zones with fences and guards around them. Inside were cities, towns, fields and factories.

Actually, there was all kinds of people out there - prisoners, yes, but also just workers. Prisoners and workers hung out together and had relationships and children with each other. It was not the mass murder system that the liars like the recently deceased novelist make it out to be.

How could this be if everyone hated the horrible mass murdering terror machine? For better or for worse, at the time of the gulags, a lot of Soviet citizens supported the repression because for various reasons they opposed those who opposed Stalin.

Out in the gulags in the 1950's, they all even went on strike one time - guards, prisoners, and workers together, after Khrushchev killed Beria, supposedly the most evil NKVD mass murderer of them all. Apparently Mr. Beria was quite well liked in the gulags, by guards, prisoners and workers all, for being a fair-minded man. Why they felt this way, I have no idea.

There were four or more levels in the gulag, and not all of them were harsh. Some of those levels were more exile or penal colonies than anything else. As you can see from the anecdote above, some of the "gulags" were not uniformly miserable places.

However, it is true that in 1939, 1 million Poles were deported to the gulags after the invasion of Poland. There were reasons for that, since this occurred during the Soviet occupation of Poland in the context of a hellaciously murderous war between the USSR and Germany, but it doesn't seem like it was the right thing to do.

The novelist lied when he said that 110 million people were murdered in his land. The number is 1.6 million and breaks down as follows:

Executions of political prisoners: 900,000
Deaths during dekulakization in Ukraine: 390,000
Deaths of political prisoners in labor camps: 300,000

I'm not including the "Holodomor" crap because the famine was not intentional, nor was it limited to the Ukraine.

Executions of political prisoners and deaths during population transfers during WW2 are not included. It was a terrible time, with a tremendous amount killings of civilians and fighters on all sides by all forces.

I'm also not including criminals who were executed or deaths of criminals in labor camps. Most of them were rapists, robbers and murderers. Of the 1.2 million deaths in the gulag, 900,000 were such criminals.

On the other hand, I would like to point out that some of the gulags were pretty horrible places, lots of people were punished there who had done little wrong, and punishments for infractions while in the camps were also very harsh and cruel.

I think most people nowadays do not wish to live in a secret police state like Stalin's that executes dissidents and throws them into often-Hellish labor camps. So I think that Communists should not execute political prisoners and ought not to operate gulags. Remaining Communist states often adhere to this rule.

Cuba's prisons are not very harsh on a Latin American scale, and no one has been executed for a political crime in a very long time. In Vietnam and Laos, things are similar. North Korea is still an extremely harsh and cruel police state, and in many ways, so is China. For one thing, China probably executes 20,000 prisoners, mostly or all common criminals, a year.

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.

The Jewigarchs

I really enjoyed this very even-handed treatment of the Jewish oligarchs of Russia that we dealt with in a previous post. They are not gone. Four out of ten of Russia's richest men are Jews, and Jews are .38% (.4%) of the population. The more I learn about these guys, the more I am mystified by them.

Some of them are in tight with Putin, so the notion that Putin was stealing back money from the Jewigarchs that the Jewigarchs ripped off from Russia is uncertain. Plus the Jewigarchs are diversifying their wealth, moving to Israel, selling off all their Russian holdings and merging with multinational corporations like British Petroleum.

Some are even hiding their identities, wearing Orthodox crosses and accompanying Putin to church. Whether or not these guys were ripping off Russia for the tribe in some kind of ethnic warfare is not known. Maybe they were just trying to get rich. The Russian Gentile oligarchs have bled the country dry too, but I guess they are keeping their money in the country.

Some of the Jewigarchs are deeply involved in Russian politics, which seems stupid when you realize how anti-Semitic Russians are. But Russians, despite their anti-Semitism, can't seem to see the big Jewigarchs like Boris Berezovsky monkeying around behind the scenes. What I am saying is that Russians don't necessarily vote anti-Semitically at all.

I don't know what to make about this, but as one commenter said, the Russians would probably prefer to be ripped off by their own kind that to have some minuscule minority, who are often not even that patriotic, ripping them off. Who knows?

Berezovsky seems to have been somehow tangled up in the radiation poisoning of the Putin critic in London, one the strangest murders in the past couple years. A lot of these Jewigarchs have security details as big as Cheney's. Like a lot of things, the more you read about these guys, the less you know.

As soon as we got the link to that story in the fantastic Exile.ru magazine (cached front page), the site went down. Here's a cached copy, minus photos, in case the magazine goes down for good. The Exile was having trouble and was said to be going out of business. Turns out that the Russian government raided the place and seized some papers.

It's really the longest-running opposition paper in Russia, and Putin is sort of a fascist who shuts down papers and kills journalists and all sorts of anti-Tom Paine type stuff. That left Exile investors (hey, where's my damn investors?!) running for the hills and the mag headed into the Red Sea.

The article is called, The Jews, Where Are They Now? and it's a superb treatment of the matter that avoids anti-Semitism.

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.

Why Russians Are Anti-Semites

Nowadays, anyway.

The Russian Mafia.

The Oligarchs.

Names like Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Boris Berezovsky, Mikhail Chernoy, Vladimir Gusinsky, Roman Abramovich, Alex Goldfarb, Mikhail Brudno and Vladimir Dubov, Leonid Nevzlin, Jacob Rothschild, David and Simon Reuben, Mikhail Fridman, Pyotr Aven and Alexander Abramov.

What did they do? Read it and weep.

All they did was bleed the country dry, steal every nickel of wealth Russia had, then send all the money to their Jewish friends and partners in crime in Israel and the US.

In other words, there was a concerted effort on the part of a small group of Russian Jews to bleed the country dry and steal from the anti-Semitic Russians that they hated so much. A plot steal the money for the Jews and keep it for themselves, or, when some patriot tried to get ahold of it, to ship it to some other rich Jews in Israel, New York or London - at any rate, to keep the money in the hands of the Jews.

At one time, there were said to be seven oligarchs in Russia, and six of them were Jews - these seven were said to own 70% of Russia's national resources.

This is age-old Jewish economic warfare, but we don't see it so often in the US anymore. It was really bad at the turn of the century and until 1925 or so. Henry Ford, an unduly criticized man, wrote, in The International Jew (an unduly criticized book) about Jewish economic warfare in the US during this period. He documented it in this book and in a column in the Dearborn Independent.

He uncovered a Jewish plot to take control over the New York Stock Exchange. Gentiles would sell their seats to anyone with the cash, but the Jews would either hold onto their seats, or, if they sold them, only sell them to other Jews.

Thus, gradually, the Jewish percentage of the NYSE rose and rose. Ford, a US patriot, blew the whistle on this ethnic warfare, and Gentiles on the NYSE started to refuse to sell their seats to Jews. This was the right and proper thing for them to do.

He also uncovered a similar Jewish plot to take over US investment banking. They pretty much got control over it, but I'm not sure if that is still the case. Anyway, he blew the whistle a little late on that one.

Then he noticed a similar plot underway to seize the nation's commercial banks. He blew the whistle on that one just in time, and the banks just quit selling to Jews altogether. In this way, the NYSE and our nation's commercial banks were saved from being controlled by a tiny minority that often does not have our national interests in mind.

Around the same time, similar Jewish plots were hatched to take control over the nation's largest papers. This was mostly because these papers were being run by racist White Americans (most US Whites were racists back in those days).

The papers were anti-Black and anti-Semitic at the very least. So a number of wealthy Jews held some meetings with businesspeople and plotted to buy out the papers. This is how Jewish control over the New York Times was established, and it remains under Jewish control to this day. Do you think the Sulzbergers will ever let it slip into the hands of the Gentiles? Don't bet on it.

At the same time, these same Jews noticed that the budding Hollywood film industry was also under the control of White racists hostile to Blacks and Jews. Birth of a Nation was a real wake-up call for these Jews. The same thing happened. Some big money Jews met with Jews who were interested in film.

Within 10-20 years, Hollywood was in the hands of the Jews, mainly about four or five Jews who all grew up in Galicia about 100 miles from one another. Hollywood is much more Gentile now, especially at the lower levels, and the Gentiles have been breaking into even directing and production for some time now.

But a select group of Jews still has some pretty significant control over the place, especially at the upper levels. It's so bad that Gentile aspiring actors actually wear Jewish stars of David to interviews in order to pretend to be Jewish to increase their chances of getting hired. I wonder if these Jews will ever give up the highest reins of this industry?

That's the problem when an ethnocentric group like this grabs an industry - they want to keep it in the hands of the tribe, and they often refuse to sell out to non-tribals.

Jewish apologists like to say that this is all normal and ok in capitalism. I don't like any kind of ethnic warfare. On what legal basis to Jews have a right to practice - let's face it - discrimination, in order to hire their own, promote their own, and keep their property in the hands of their own?

Whites did this for decades in this country, and all of this discriminatory crap has been made illegal. Further, it's a downright obsession of the heavily-Jewish media.

But if it's wrong for Whites to discriminate to hire, promote and even hold onto their wealth, surely it is for Jews too. It's well-known in Hollywood that many Jews hire and promote their own. To this day, not one soul has ever called them on it.

Ford's writings make another disturbing fact clear. When you are dealing with an ethnic group that is waging ethnic warfare against you, the only way to fight them is to become racist yourselves. The only way to fight Jewish ethnic warfare was for Gentiles to be anti-Semites.

If they had not given in to racism, they would have been steamrolled. This is disturbing because if one chooses anti-racism in this circumstance, you will be destroyed. Becoming racist is the only sane and logical thing to do.

What would happen if something similar happened in today's America, where Whites at least have been stripped of all ethnic identity, shamed of racism, and for the most part had their capacities for racism stripped right out of them? While at the same time, Blacks and Hispanics at least seem to have retained the capacity for racism (see the Black-Hispanic gang warfare in Los Angeles these days)?

It is true that Catholics in New York still retain the potential for waging ethnic warfare, in this case against New York Jews, who retain ferocious ethnic warfare to this very day. This is why the New York mayorship shifts from Catholic to Jew from time to time. These Catholics are often Italian and Irish, but they now have some allies in Dominicans at least.

If these Catholics did not wage anti-Semitic warfare against ethnic warfare-engaging New York Jews, they would be creamed, and the Jews would hold all the power and much of the money in New York. Because these Catholics are still capable of being just a ruthlessly racist as New York Jews, they are able to hold onto a semblance of power.

I used to know this Dominican fellow on the Net. You can ridicule this relationship all you want, but he and I spent many hours talking together, sometimes hours a night. How many married couples even do that?

He used to be a teenage criminal, roaming the streets with a Dominican gang and even sticking people up. Along the way, he had smoked a lot of PCP. Now he lived, I think alone, in a building with Orthodox Jewish landlords whom he despised. He had spent a long time, maybe years, carefully researching the New York real estate market.

It appears that there are city-owned properties that are leased out to private landlords for a period of years, and then taken back by the city. There is a vast amount of real estate involved here, and there are fortunes to be made.

This guy determined that whenever there was a Jewish mayor in office, about 70% of the NYC RE property was "locked up" in closed bids that, the guy finally determined after long and difficult study, went 100% to Jews and Jews only, and not to anyone else. For the most part, they went to Orthodox Jews. There was no way on fucking Earth for a non-Jew to ever get ahold of even one of these properties.

These were also the best properties to own. The research was difficult because most of the evidence was covered up by massive lying on the part of the Jews involved. The bids themselves were closed and the records were sealed.

This guy was not really an anti-Semitic nut, and he think he didn't really have that much against Jews, and I don't think he was making all this stuff up. In fact, we used to sit around at night trying to figure Jews out. We finally decided that they were running sort of a Masonic-style private club for wealth.

We decided that even though it was evil, the best way to make a bundle in this world was to form our own little Jewish-Masonic secret wealth society, keep all the money in our hands, hire and promote our own, and shut everyone else the fuck out. So in a way, we both really wanted to ape the Jews and emulate them. We used to laugh like mad over the cleverness of Jews.

Our plan was totally evil and probably even racist. For sure it was discriminatory. But it never came to fruition, and I still live barely above the poverty line.

The guy vanished and I never heard from him again. He had found me through my legendary posts on Usenet in the Israeli and Middle East group. I was posting under a pro-Palestine name and making tons of deadly enemies and a few devoted fans.

We started dwelling more and more on evil cabal stuff in our conversations, and then we started talking about spying.

I don't know what got that started, maybe because the Usenet Jews had these really creepy and evil Jewish Spy Networks they were operating on us pro-Palestinians. They had weird dossiers on us and were always threatening to uncover who we really were and make it sure that we never held a good job in America again. Oh, how these powerless Jews loved to toss their weight around!

Anyway, after a while, I started implying to the guy that maybe I was a spy who worked for the CIA or the Mossad, or maybe I was a double agent.

Plus at the time, I was communicating with these weird Palestinians who were actually undercover members of the PFLP and were living these creepy, is-it-illegal-or-what type lives in the US.

We only knew each other according to code names, and if anyone tried to ask for anyone's number, or try to find out where anyone lived, there could be Hell to pay. Everyone suspected everyone else of being an agent (especially they suspected me) and there were always rumors that so and so was a spy.

So it was really a barrel of fun and laughs. This Palestinian dude would just take off for weeks at a time and tell no one. He would come back and say he had been in the Middle East. He had a PhD, spoke fluent Russian from his time in the USSR, and was definitely a member of the PFLP, which is an officially designated US terrorist organization. Eventually I got tossed out of their PFLP circle on grounds of being a Zionist agent. Oh well.

Well, with all this weird drama around, I started telling the guy I was really a spy, or maybe I wasn't, and all these agencies maybe I did or did not work for. And I implied that he was probably a spy too. Then I would laugh and say it's all joke, or was it really?

Eventually the guy started totally spinning and saying he couldn't handle talking to me anymore because I was freaking him the Hell out. Anyway, if you ever want to destroy a friendship just for the sheer Hell of it, this is a great way to do it.

He also told me another interesting story. As soon as Catholic mayor came in (in this case, it was Italian Catholic Giuliani), the city called back its RE properties, and then the process was taken over by an evil Catholic cabal, who promptly sold about 70% of NYC RE to Catholics. Paybacks are a bitch, and the Jews got theirs. It was Catholics versus Jews, just like back in Europe for hundreds of years.

Now, a lot of people reading this think I am making this up. I say I'm not, but I don't have any real proof of this one way or another. But if it is true, it points up some of the difficult questions above. In order to deal with Jewish ethnic warfare, Catholics had to engage in some of their own. They had to become anti-Semites. And Jews can't wage Jewish ethnic warfare of their own without being racists too.

The guy also said that Jews were rude, tight, and treated non-Jews like crap. He said this held true for Orthodox Jews in New York, in particular his Jewish landlords, who were little more than slumlords.

Getting back to our Russian oligarchs, there's a long history of hatred between Russians and Jews. We hear a lot about Russians being horrible anti-Semites, but we don't hear much about Russian Jews being horrible Russian-haters. Who started it? Who the Hell knows? Who cares? That's like two 6-year old boys fighting and screaming, "He started it!" after being pulled apart.

From the Internet, we find some confessions of Russian Jews, this one named "Alexandr Ukrainsky". He notes that Russian Jews have a habit of making a Bloody Mary and claim to be drinking Christian blood. Just like the blood libel! Great, way to perpetuate a stereotype!

Furthermore, they have some of the worst anti-Jewish stereotypical behaviors of any group. Cheapness, greediness, you name it, these are some of the "Jewiest" Jews out there outside of Israel. Or, to put it more politely, as my brilliant Mom would deftly put it, they are really, really Jewish.

These behaviors are tied in with them seeing themselves as the most Zionist, proudest Jews out there. Here again we see the tie-in with the worst anti-Semitic stereotypes of Jews (the Jewiest Jews of them all) and Zionism.

Zionism is nothing more than the European ghetto, reconstructed in the minds of Jews everywhere, and on the ground in a large piece of real estate in Palestine. Zionists are the worst Jews of them all, the ones who gave and give Jews a bad name. They really are against everything secular, liberating, and assimilating about the Jewish project, because Israel is the biggest damn ghetto that's ever existed.

The Orthodox Jews themselves recreate mental ghettos the world over, and physical ones in upstate New York. Zionism gives their tribal way a home made of Earth in the Mediterranean if they ever need to escape from their crimes.

As long as Orthodoxy and Zionism exist, the Jew will never achieve liberation. By the way, Marx makes a very similar point in his famous On The Jewish Question. Quite hard to read but you may want to check it out. If you can figure it out, pat yourself on the back.

With the return of capitalism to Russia, Organized Crime, including many Russian Jews and Jews in the US, Israel and the UK, bled the country dry and stole just about everything that wasn't locked down. Russia was turned into a complete sewer, and is now one of the Organized Crime capitals of the world.

Russian law enforcement did used to crack down on Russian oligarchs sometimes, but the criminals were very powerful and often used to kill cops (and the existing ones still do). In the case of the Jewish criminals (the so-called oligarchs) they had the entire weight of World Organized Jewry behind them.

For instance, when Putin tossed Jewish super-criminal Mikhail Khodorkovsky behind bars, Richard Perle and other top US Jewish neocons virtually threatened to declare war on Russia.

No wonder Russians are so anti-Semitic.

Notes

I am indebted to a conversation I had with Kevin MacDonald in formulating some of the ideas that I developed in this piece. I do not necessarily subscribe to MacDonald's views on the Jews in toto, but I think he is unjustly maligned. In my conversation with him, I did not get the impression that MacDonald was anti-Semitic at all; in fact, I felt that he admired Jews and wished that Gentile Whites acted more like them.

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.