Eles Comem Peixe Ainda Vivos!

This is the Portuguese translation of the Eating a Cooked Fish While It Is Still Alive post. Translator: Elaine from Brazil.

This post has been translated into Korean (한국). Spanish translation (en Español).

Este é um vídeo muito perturbador e bárbaro, povo chinês comendo uma carpa que tenha sido preparado de forma especial para que ele ainda esteja vivo depois de ser cozido. A cabeça é mantida envolta em uma toalha fria para resfriá-lo fora assim que permanece vivo enquanto o resto é bem carbonizados. Em seguida, é servido aos comensais chineses que pegar na carne com pauzinhos enquanto risos e gargalhadas.

Isso é um absurdo. Eu sou um pescador e gosto de comer peixe também, mas um peixe deve estar morto quando você come. Quebrou meu coração para ver que os peixes ainda vivos em movimento, depois de quase queimados na fogueira é frito em óleo, para ser consumido enquanto vivo. Esta é uma das formas supremas de tortura.

Os índios da Costa do Golfo, como o Karankawa e suas Tunicas são usadas para amarrar guerreiros inimigos em cativeiro e com uma estaca em chamas atacam suas vitimas, em seguida com facas e fatiam um pouco de carne deles e consumi los...é muita crueldade. Se é errado fazer isso com um ser humano, que é errado fazê-lo a um peixe. Mate o primeiro peixe, depois comê-lo.

Nacionalistas Brancos freqüentemente comentam que Nordeste asiáticos são um povo cruel e bárbaro, e acho que pode haver alguma verdade nisso, pelo menos no caso dos chineses. Os chineses precisam de sair do Reino do Meio fantasia e venha se juntar ao resto do mundo civilizado no século 21.

Comen Pez Cocinado Mientras Aún Está Vivo

This is the Spanish translation of the Eating a Cooked Fish While It Is Still Alive post. Translator: Fabián Aguilar, a crazy guy from Bogotá, Colombia, who likes Saturdays.

Korean translation (한국). Portuguese translation (em Português).

Este es un video muy intenso mostrando a unos barbáricos chinos comiéndose un pez carpa que ha sido cocinado de una forma especial para que continúe vivo luego de haber sido preparado. Su cabeza es mantenida en una toalla fría envuelta para que siga vivo mientras el resto de su cuerpo es carbonizado. Luego es servido a los comensales chinos quienes arrancan la carne con palillos en medio de risas.

Esto es simplemente enfermizo. Soy pescador y también como pescado, pero un pez debería estar muerto cuando lo comes. Me rompió el corazón ver que este pez aún se estaba moviendo, luego de haber sido quemado en una brasa y hervido en aceite para ser consumido vivo.

Los indios de la Costa del Golfo (EEUU) como los Karankawa y Tunica solían atar enemigos en cautiverio a una estaca en llamas luego corrían hacia ellos con cuchillos despellejándoles algunas partes del cuerpo, enseguida consumían su carne en frente de ellos para volverlos locos de manera cruel. Si está mal hacerlo con un ser humano, está mal hacerlo con un pez. Mata el pez primero y luego lo consumes.

Los blancos nacionalistas comentan con frecuencia que los asiáticos nororientales son gente cruel y barbárica y pienso que puede haber algo de cierto en esto, por lo menos en el caso de los chinos. China necesita bajar de esa nube del Imperio Medio y unirse al resto del mundo civilizado del siglo XXI.

몸통과 꼬리만 튀겨져 살아있는 생선

This is a Korean translation of the Eating a Cooked Fish While It Is Still Alive post. The translation was done by 미피캣.

Portuguese translation (em Português). Spanish translation (en Español).

야만적인 중국인들이 잉어를 살아있는 채로 요리해 먹는 불쾌한 영상입니다. 생선의 머리만 차가운 수건으로 감싼 채로 요리해서 살아있는 채로 구웠다는군요. 젓가락으로 생선을 들쑤시는 중국인이 낄낄대며 웃고 있습니다.

정말 욕 나오는 영상입니다. 저도 낚시를 하고 생선을 먹지만, 살아서 버둥대는 채로 먹진 않습니다. 저 잉어가 기름에 구워지고 뻐끔거리다가 산채로 먹히는 모습을 생각해보니 가슴이 찢어질 것 같습니다. 이건 고문입니다.

걸프 코스트의 카란카와 원주민과 튜니카 원주민들은, 적의 포로를 잡아 불에 태운 다음 칼로 살점을 찢어발기는 잔혹하고 광적인 의식을 행하곤 했습니다. 인간에게 해서 안 되는 일이라면 물고기에게도 해선 안 될 겁니다. 죽이고 나서, 그다음에 먹어야 합니다.

백인 국가주의자들은 아시아 사람들을 잔인하고 야만적이라고 비하하곤 하는데,중국의 이 영상을 보고 어쩌면 맞는 말일지도 모르겠다고 생각했습니다. 중국은 중세왕국의 판타지에서 벗어나 21세기 문명사회에 합당한 모습을 보여야 할 것입니다.

Eating a Cooked Fish While It Is Still Alive

This post has been translated into Korean (한국). Spanish translation (en Español). Portuguese translation (em Português).

This is a very disturbing video showing barbaric Chinese people eating a carp that has been cooked in a special way so that it is still alive after being cooked. It's head is kept wrapped in a cool towel to cool it off so it stays alive while the rest of it is charred well. Then it is served to Chinese diners who pick at the flesh with chopsticks while giggling and laughing.

This is just sickening. I am a fisherman and I eat fish too, but a fish should be dead when you eat it. It broke my heart to see that fish still moving, after being nearly burned at the stake and boiled in oil and then to be consumed while alive. This is one of the supreme forms of torture.

The Indians of the Gulf Coast of the Southern USA such as the Karankawa and Tunica used to tie captive enemy warriors to a burning stake, then rush up to them with knives and slice off a bit of their flesh and consume it in front of them to drive them mad with cruelty. If it's wrong to do it to a human, it's wrong to do it to a fish. Kill the fish first, then eat it.

White nationalists often comment that Northeast Asians are a cruel and barbaric people, and I think there might be some truth to this, at least in the case of the Chinese. The Chinese need to climb out of the Middle Kingdom fantasy and come join the rest of the civilized world in the 21st Century.

Evolution of the Proto-Asians

A commenter, lakanino, a Filipino, comments on the Are Southeast Asians Australoids? post:

Australoid seem to be pretty spread all over Asia (even the whole world) and this may be even true before the Mongoloid showed up. Do you think its possible that before there were any Mongoloid, that a group of these Australoid, say somewhere near the Tonkin Gulf or maybe a little north of it, may have evolved much faster than the other Australoid settlements and evolved to which are the, lets say, proto-Mongoloids?

Now, this evolution, whatever caused it (natural selection, artificial selection, or diet, etc) gave this improved Australoid a higher cognitive ability.

They made better tools and improved gathering of food, less famine, and with these advancement, the population exploded (relatively). And this population growth led to faster movement of people going to the North and mixing with less evolved Australoid settlements like the Ainus, & South mixing with settlements in Island Southeast Asia.

I’ve been reading a lot of papers lately and I can’t help but noticed this trend. Although this idea maybe far fetch, especially, with genetic studies showing coalescence of certain genetic mutations that may go against this idea.

What are your thoughts?

I believe that all Asians evolved from Australoids in the Tonkin Gulf region. That line goes back 53,000 years at least. The northern lines - one to NE Asians and another to Japanese - appear shortly afterward.

So the NE Asians - Japanese /Koreans - SE Asian split goes back a good 50,000 years or so. It is very deep.

I'm not sure about your theory. It looks instead the Ainu are remnants of this early Asian Australoid type that went to proto-Mongoloid. 9,000 years ago, in NE Asia, Ainu types transition to classic modern NE Asians. Of course, some older Ainu types remain on the scene and these are the present day Ainu.

About population replacement, I am not sure. However, from 9,000 YBP a more modern type radiates out of NE Asia and replaces most of the archaic Australoid types, with only the Ainu being unreplaced.

In the South, a modern SE Asian type evolves and rapidly spreads out across the region, replacing Negrito types in Southern China, Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam and the Philippines and possibly semi-replacing Melanesian Australoid types in Indonesia. It stands to reason that they were more advanced than the Negritos they replaced, as the replacement process is well-documented in SE Asia.

Therefore, lakanino's theory may be correct, but the replacement occurred much later, on the order of 5,000-9,000 years ago instead of 53,000 years ago.

There was some southward movement of NE Asian types down into Southern China and this trend has continued to this day. The modern high IQ NE Asian type (including Vietnamese and S. Chinese) has an intellectual profile that is not dated. We do not know when they became so smart. For all we know, it may have occurred only in the past 200 years or so.

Replacement was gradual. Ainu types went to modern NE Asians in the north 9000 years ago and Negrito types went to modern SE Asians in the South 5000 years ago or so. There are movements of highly intelligent S. Chinese types down into SE Asia, especially Vietnam, but also into Indonesia and Philippines.

We lack knowledge of the IQ's of ancient Asian types. IQ testing of the Senoi and Semang in Malaysia, the Negritos of the Philippines and Andaman Islands and the Ainu of Japan would be helpful to shed some light on this subject.

I would like to say one more thing about the SE Asian = Australoid thing. This theory is based on observation of the facial features of modern-day SE Asians. Such observation reveals a resemblance to Australoid types. Modern SE Asians, otherwise, do not resemble Australoids in skulls or in genes.

Negritos and the Senoi of Malaysia are exceptions to the rule, since their skulls look Australoid. No modern SE Asians cluster genetically with Australoids. Senoi genes look Malay and Negrito genes resemble whatever modern types they live near.

The Head Size/Race/IQ Trainwreck

The latest death toll figures from Hurricane Katrina can be seen on this website here. The famous Russian neo-Nazi video is on this blog here.

Updated September 3:

Average cranial capacities of indigenous populations, sex-combined means. Black: 1450 cc. and over; checkerboard: 1400-1449; crosshatching: 1350-1399; horizontal striping: 1300-1349; diagonal striping: 1250-1299; dots: 1200-1249. From Beals et al., 1984.

Click to enlarge.

White racists like to make a big deal about the supposed correlation between head size and intelligence and race. A nice little chart showing the basically dishonest portrayal they attempt based on cherry-picking data is below. I've already dealt with this before, but it's time to add some new evidence to the theory.

As you can see, in the Americas, there is no good evidence whatsoever for head size and IQ. I am not aware that Amerindian IQ varies in the Americas. The average is apparently 87 across the continent. If anyone can show me that it varies by latitude, please do.

The biggest heads of all are in Northern Chinese (Manchurians), Eskimos, Alaskan natives, Siberians and Mongolians. The Northern Chinese IQ is 105, the Mongolian IQ is 100, the Eskimo IQ is 91, the Alaska native IQ is 87 and the Siberian native IQ is not known.

Note that Amerindians in Canada, Alaska, Mexico (!) and Tierra Del Fuego have larger heads (1400-1449 cc.) than any Europeans, yet Europeans have higher IQ's than any of these Amerindians, who have IQ's of 87. In addition, Uralics and Northeast Asians also have very large heads. Northeast Asians have median IQ's of 105, Uralics have IQ's of 96 and Amerindians have IQ's of 87.

Amerindians in most of the US and in most of Latin America, Egyptians, Ugandans and Oceanians (Polynesians, Melanesians and Micronesians) have the same sized heads (1350-1399 cc.) as Northern and Central Europeans.

Northern and Central Europeans have median IQ's of 98, Amerindians are at 87, Oceanians have median IQ's of 84.5, and Ugandans have IQ's of 73.

Some Amerindians, North Africans and Sahelians, Central Indians and Arabs, SE Asian Islanders (Indonesians, Bruneians, Malays and Filipinos), South Africans, New Guineans, and Middle Easterners have the same head sizes (1300-1349 cc.) as Southern Europeans.

Southern Europeans have a median IQ of 93. Amerindians again have IQ's of 87. SE Asian Islanders have median IQ's of 89.5, Arabs, North Africans and Middle Easterners have median IQ's of 83.5. Central Indians and Central Asians have median IQ's of 82. South Africans have median IQ's of 70.5. Sahelians and West Africans have median IQ's of 67.5.

It is true that most Africans have small heads, at 1250-1299 cc. However, southern Indians and some Amerindians have the same sized heads. These Africans have median IQ's of 68.5, the Indians have IQ's of 81.5 and the Amerindians have IQ's of 87.

The smallest heads in the world (1200-1249 cc.) are actually not found in Africa. They are found in SE Asia and South India and Sri Lanka (we will also include the Seychelles and the Comoros). South Indians have a median IQ of 81 and SE Asians have median IQ's of 90.

Does any of this make much sense? Not really.

Race realists, for the most part Northern European racists, often use a subset of these figures to demonstrate a link between IQ and head size. The subset looks something like this.

Misleading Racist Head Size/IQ Chart

Head Size
Asians       Europeans     Africans
Largest      Intermediate  Smallest
1400-1449cc. 1350-1399 cc. 1250-1299 cc.

IQ
Asians   Europeans    Africans
106      100          67

This is misleading. Let's do it the right way.

Proper Head Size/IQ Chart

Largest heads 1450 cc.+
Variable        IQ

North Chinese*  105
Mongolians      99.5
Eskimos         91
Amerindians**   87
Siberians***    unknown

Median          95.5

*Manchuria
**Alaskans
***Aboriginals

Large heads 1400-1449 cc.
Variable       IQ

NE Asians*     105
Russians**     96
Amerindians**  87

Median         96

*incl. S. Chinese
**Uralics
**Canada, Alaska, Mexico, Fuegians

Medium-large heads 1350-1399 cc.
Variable             IQ

Nor./Cent. Europeans 98
Amerindians*         87
Oceanians**          84.5
Ugandans             73

Median               86

*Most Amerindians
**Polynesia, Micronesia, Melanesia

Medium-small heads 1300-1349 cc. 
Variable               IQ

S. Europeans           93
SE Asian Islanders*    89.5
Amerindians**          87
Middle Easterners***   83.5
Central Asians****     82
South Africans         70.5
Sahelians/W. Africans  67.5
Papuans                65

Median                 82.5 

*Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines
**Equatorial
***Arabs, North Africans and SW Asians
****Incl. Central Indians

Small heads 1250-1299 cc.                                             
Variable      IQ

Amerindians*  87
South Indians 81.5
Africans**    68.5

Median        81.5

*Caribbean
**Most

Smallest heads 1200-1249 cc.
Variable           IQ

SE Asians          90
Far South Indians* 81

Median             85.5

*Incl. Sri Lanka, Seychelles, Comoros

This looks like a complete wreck to me. There's just not much there, once you sit down and really do the map.

People with large heads have very high (Several European countries = 101) and very low IQ's (Ugandans = 73). Some people with the smallest heads have very high IQ's (Vietnamese = 99.5). There's sort of a general trend, but the data is all over the place, like a drunk throwing darts at a dartboard.

I wish people would quit talking about this race = head size = IQ thing already.

References

Beals, K.L., Smith, C.L. & Dodd, S.M. 1984. Brain Size, Cranial Morphology, Climate, and Time Machines. Current Anthropology, 25:301-330.

Lynn, R. and Vanhanen, T. 2006. IQ and Global Inequality. Augusta, GA: Washington Summit Publishers.

Meisenberg, Gerhard. Winter 2003. IQ Population Genetics: It’s Not as Simple as You Think. Washington, DC: Mankind Quarterly, Volume XLIV, Number 2, pp.185-210.

Note: Readers should carefully read the Commenting Rules before commenting to avoid having their comments edited or deleted and to avoid being banned from the site.